The most important
issue this paper raises for me is the guideline for customers: don't pretend.
Not exact matches
For instance, Mishkin (2012:1 and 24) explains that «in our economy, nonbank finance also plays an important role in channeling funds from lender - savers to borrower - spenders... Finance companies
raise funds by
issuing commercial
paper and stocks and bonds and use the proceeds to make loans that are particularly suited to consumer and business needs.»
This
raises issues as to why the government created the CEIFB in the first place (subject of upcoming
paper).
This
paper raises the
issue, specifies the way, and sets the trend in that direction.
One
issue which could have been
raised is that regarding the place of the Bible in such a context, where one is not surprised to occasionally find copies of the Bible kept with old newspapers on the kerbside, to be picked up by the
paper recycling service!
(«There would have to be a
paper on the moral
issues raised by chocolate; the more she thought of it, the richer became the philosophical dimensions of chocolate.»)
In this case, though, the ad appears in a
paper aimed directly at congressmembers, congressional staff and the lobby community, who by many accounts pay attention to who's buying space in Roll Call, The Hill, Congress Daily, etc. — both for the direct messages and for the indirect message sent about who's willing to spend money to
raise the profile of their
issues.
Glyn Fullelove added: «Nevertheless, this is a thoughtful
paper that clearly reflects the responses to the earlier round of consultation from the CIOT and others and does justice to the practical
issues raised.
The government will publish a white
paper on higher education funding in the winter with further proposals on the longer - term
issues raised by the Browne review.
«One of the reasons we
raised the
issue last week was, and that has come up in the
papers today, the Prime Minister saying, «Well the most important thing here is to maintain our relationship with the Russian state».
Letter from AAAS CEO Rush Holt to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Regarding Fingerprint Reporting Guidelines [March 28, 2018] AAAS Statement on FY 2018 Omnibus Bill Funds for Scientific Research [March 23, 2018] AAAS Statement on FY 2018 Omnibus Funding Bill [March 22, 2018] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement on Death of Rep. Louise Slaughter [March 16, 2018] AAAS CEO Urges U.S. President and Congress to Lift Funding Restrictions on Gun Violence Research [March 13, 2018] AAAS Statements on Elections and
Paper Ballots [March 9, 2018] AAAS Statement on President's 2019 Budget Plan [February 12, 2018] AAAS Statement on FY 2018 Budget Deal and Continuing Resolution [February 9, 2018] AAAS Statement on President Trump's State of the Union Address [January 30, 2018] AAAS Statement on Continuing Resolution Urges FY 2018 Final Omnibus Bill [January 22, 2018] AAAS Statement on U.S. Government Shutdown [January 20, 2018] Community Statement to OMB on Science and Government [December 19, 2017] AAAS CEO Response to Media Report on Use of «Science - Based» at CDC [December 15, 2017] Letter from AAAS and the American Physical Society to Iranian President Hassan Rouhani Regarding Scientist Ahmadreza Djalali [December 15, 2017] Multisociety Letter Conference Graduate Student Tax Provisions [December 7, 2017] Multisociety Letter Presses Senate to Preserve Higher Education Tax Benefits [November 29, 2017] AAAS Multisociety Letter on Tax Reform [November 15, 2017] AAAS Letter to U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee on Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)[November 7, 2017] AAAS Statement on Release of National Climate Assessment Report [November 3, 2017] AAAS Statement on EPA Science Adviser Boards [October 31, 2017] AAAS Statement on EPA Restricting Scientist Communication of Research Results [October 25, 2017] Statement of the Board of Directors of the American Association for the Advancement of Science on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility [October 18, 2017] Scientific Societies» Letter on President Trump's Visa and Immigration Proclamation [October 17, 2017] AAAS Statement on U.S. Withdrawal from UNESCO [October 12, 2017] AAAS Statement on White House Proclamation on Immigration and Visas [September 25, 2017] AAAS Statement from CEO Rush Holt on ARPA - E Reauthorization Act [September 8, 2017] AAAS Speaks Out Against Trump Administration Halt of Young Immigrant Program [September 6, 2017] AAAS Statement on Trump Administration Disbanding National Climate Assessment Advisory Committee [August 22, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt
Issues Statement On Death of Former Rep. Vern Ehlers [August 17, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt and 15 Other Science Society Leaders Request Climate Science Meeting with EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt [July 31, 2017] AAAS Encourages Congressional Appropriators to Invest in Research and Innovation [July 25, 2017] AAAS CEO Urges Secretary of State to Fill Post of Science and Technology Adviser [July 13, 2017] AAAS and ESA Urge Trump Administration to Protect Monuments [July 7, 2017] AAAS Statement on House Appropriations Bill for the Department of Energy [June 28, 2017] Scientific Organizations Statement on Science and Government [June 27, 2017] AAAS Statement on White House Executive Order on Cuba Relations [June 16, 2017] AAAS Statement on Paris Agreement on Climate Change [June 1, 2017] AAAS Statement from CEO Rush Holt on Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Proposal [May 23, 2017] AAAS thanks the Congress for prioritizing research and development funding in the FY 2017 omnibus appropriations [May 9, 2017] AAAS Statement on Dismissal of Scientists on EPA Scientific Advisory Board [May 8, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement on FY 2017 Appropriations [May 1, 2017] AAAS CEO Statement on Executive Order on Climate Change [March 28, 2017] AAAS leads an intersociety letter on the HONEST Act [March 28, 2017] President's Budget Plan Would Cripple Science and Technology, AAAS Says [March 16, 2017] AAAS Responds to New Immigration Executive Order [March 6, 2017] AAAS CEO Responds to Trump Immigration and Visa Order [January 28, 2017] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement on Federal Scientists and Public Communication [January 24, 2017] AAAS thanks leaders of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act [December 21, 2016] AAAS CEO Rush Holt
raises concern over President - Elect Donald Trump's EPA Director Selection [December 15, 2016] AAAS CEO Rush Holt Statement Following the House Passage of 21st Century Cures Act [December 2, 2016] Letter from U.S. scientific, engineering, and higher education community leaders to President - elect Trump's transition team [November 23, 2016] Letter from AAAS CEO Rush Holt to Senate Leaders and Letter to House Leaders to pass a FY 2017 Omnibus Spending Bill [November 15, 2016] AAAS reaffirms the reality of human - caused climate change [June 28, 2016]
Even before that
paper was published, scientists and bioethicists had
issued calls for more discussion of the
issues raised by the new techniques.
The two
papers published in DAC
raise issues about military use of drones that will likely grow in years to come.
«We are well aware of the
issues raised in the new
paper,» says Bruce Gordon, the WHO's head of water and sanitation for health.
Before anyone worries too much, researchers suggested several methods to mitigate the attacks they identified in the
paper «Jump over ASLR: Attacking the Branch Predictor to Bypass ASLR,» and companies have already started to work on the
issues raised.
The authors of an 18 - year - old
paper in PNAS corrected it after realizing some bands in a figure were duplicated (an
issue raised on PubPeer one year ago).
I thank Patrick Brown for his detailed response (also here) to statistical
issues that I
raised in my critique «Brown and Caldeira: A closer look shows global warming will not be greater than we thought» of his and Ken Caldeira's recent
paper (BC17).
Trenberth has been a lead author in at least two reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and he's an acknowledged world expert on some of the
issues raised in the
paper by Hansen et al..
And although the actual retrieval of sperm is relatively simple, a 2015
paper in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology points out that it «
raises numerous ethical questions and medico - legal
issues, including the rights of the deceased, the question of informed consent, the best interest of the child, and the motivation of the applicant.»
The
paper, nevertheless, does
raise some important
issues (see recommendations).
Moss addressed the socio - political
issues raised by «The Handmaid's Tale» in her acceptance speech by quoting Margaret Atwood, author of the book and the supervising producer of the series: «We were the people who were not in the
papers.
Jack (Bale) is a newsie, a corner - bound
paper vendor in turn - of - last - century New York who dreams of his family out west while fighting the good fight against evil publisher Pulitzer (Duvall), who has
raised the wholesale price of «papes» by about a tenth of a penny per
issue.
If a student wants an
issue raised at a meeting, he or she places a slip of
paper inside a box provided in the classroom.
Abstract: This joint
paper was conducted by
Issues without Borders (IWB) and Citizens Rights Watch (CRW), non-governmental organisations with aim to
raise awareness on the ongoing European refugee crisis, inform the public about the «IWB Refugee Project», the value of volunteering and ask you to join us and contribute to our efforts towards bringing a positive change and improve the human quality of life.
In 2016, I wrote a
paper called «The Pension Pac - Man,» attempting to
raise awareness of these
issues.
According to Kathryn Albany - Ward, founder and director of Colour Blind Awareness, the
papers are simply «not suitable for colour blind people», and she
raised the
issue with the exams regulator Ofqual in April.
But I will draw on decades of observa - tion and analysis of these systems — both in this country and abroad — to illuminate the
issues raised in this
paper.
This
paper considers the
issues raised in using standardized achievement test scores for purposes of examining the academic productivity of schools.
In addition, and since the start of ACP (the first of EGU's interactive journals) in 2001, the publication of interactive comments is supervised by the editors who have the option of censoring / deleting comments that are not of substantial nature or of direct relevance to the
issues raised in the discussion
paper or which contain personal insults.
Ferreira added, «As such, even if there is some ambiguity about whether or not you would belong to the «scientific community,» if your comment is «of substantial nature or of direct relevance to the
issues raised in the discussion
paper,» the editor in charge of the
paper would, in principle, consider it relevant to the public peer review process, keeping it in the discussion.»
Three of the authors of the new
paper, John Fasullo, Kevin Trenberth and Chris O'Dell, have posted a guest commentary on Realclimate.org elaborating on the
issues raised by their analysis.
While we know that treeline can be climatically «elastic» in the space of both latitude and altitude, i.e., moving north and south and up and down with topography, this
paper raises important
issues about rates of ecological adaption, rates that are being tested by contemporary rates of change forced by human activities.
But of all the fresh considerations of Carson's work, there's one that stands out for me at the moment — a recent
paper by two researchers of rhetoric and writing who dug in on «Silent Spring» drafts, notes and revisions and found that Carson had a remarkable and rare trait for someone so committed to
raising public concern about a pressing environmental
issue.
[Feb. 17, 12:49 p.m. Updated I've written a longer look at the
issues raised by the
paper's definitive summary and how that affected news coverage.]
As to the other
issue he
raises, it stikes me as a white
paper for funding a research project not an argument against current understanding.
This could be continually updated and edited when specific
issues are
raised, but would really focus on the dendro basics — i.e. basic theory, sampling strategies, data processing methods and commonly used statistical methods used for reconstruction etc etc — with reference to specific
papers for further reading.
One student
raised the
issue that statistical mistakes such as made by Emanuel (2005) should have been weeded out in the review process; suggested that a «statistical editor» was needed for climate journals to review the
papers for basic sound statistical practices.
Whatever the merits of the
papers at
issue (and even some climate skeptics were unimpressed), it appears that PRP did violate accepted peer review norms in producing the special
issue — as Anthony Watts details here — and concerns were
raised about the journal last year.
Role: When scientists
raise issue with the work of other scientists, they typically publish concerns in
papers in peer - reviewed journals.
They care about public opinion and keep close tabs on
issues constituents
raise in letters, meetings, phone calls and the editorial pages of local
papers.
Though some of the
issues raised in this
paper have been discussed elsewhere by the author and other writes, the
paper offers a coherent, well rounded, synthesis of epistemological assessment of forecasting, and as such is likely to be of interest to both producers and users thereof.
by Judith Curry Jim Hansen's new
paper, and his PR strategy, are
raising a whole host of
issues that are arguably a backfire for his objectives.
In the meantime, you asked someone to look at the
issues raised by this
paper, which I have done.
The WR itself Ack'd no Federal funding, although I did
raise the subtle
issue that the Said, et al (2008)
paper re-used a chunk of work from the WR & surrounding effort (i.e., reply to Stupak that had Sharabati's work.)
Ken, Gavin Schmidt has not addressed most of the
issues I
raised, and I expect he has no desire to do so as that would (on my analysis) involve admitting further serious deficiencies in the
paper, negating its main conclusions.
But let's elaborate a bit here on the two basic
issues which our Science
paper raises, one at a time, and then come back to the
issue of whether the models, or the predictions made by climate scientists overall, are any good or not.
The second
issue raised in our Science
paper (now available free, see bottom of this post) is that perhaps there shouldn't yet have been substantial long - term trends in hurricane intensity — whether we would be able detect them above the natural variability or not — because until the last couple of decades, aerosol cooling effects on hurricanes have been counteracting the effects of greenhouse gas warming.
Why don't you two get together and collaborate on a
paper that studies the
issues raised by Greg and if / where he is wrong, put the
issues to bed, and, conversely, if / where he is right, his criticism will have produced a valuable improvement to the data set.
That would leave many of the
issues that can be
raised concerning the role of IPCC, but that could at least provide a real central depository, where old
papers could be located as easily as new ones.
Of course
papers are important for the scientific record, but if the main temperature record providers update their work in response to the
issues we
raise it'll be recorded in their publications.