Not exact matches
But a consideration of medical
issues brings up the point that the somewhat - rich MREs could easily overwhelm the digestive system of a
person suffering from severe malnutrition, and a consideration of the population's unique characteristics leads to the concern that the MREs may be incompatible
with ethnic and
religious dietary restrictions.
Some athiests are just as bad as the fundimentalists... because they «know» I being and agnostic, however, take
issue with anyone who says that
people who are not
religious do not think... in fact, it has been found that statistically, athiests and agnostics know the bible better than christians.
A few
people in the town took
issue with the practice, and the case has been boiling ever since,
with both sides saying their
religious rights are on the line.
Senior CDU member Wolfgang Bosbach told newspaper Bild that
people can celebrate whatever
religious holiday they want, but «whether the state should also protect non-Christian holidays
with legal regulation in future is a different
issue entirely.»
And, unlike
religious issues, we can assume a
person with normal vision has the ability to know whether there are colors or not.
I know
people who for personal reasons are for or against certain
religious / social / political
issues who migrated to
religious groups which identify as Christian (and agree
with these
peoples» personal opinions) so they presumably might have an ultimate authority to support their opinions.
That's one of the things that make this whole
issue so absurd —
religious people demand the right to government - led prayer (a prayer that meets
with their approval, of course), but the things they'll typically ask for in their prayers can't be by accomplished by their god anyway, so it's a lot of unnecessary trouble over nothing.
In more than 30 years of pastoring and dealing
with pastors, I have observed that often when a public figure, secular or
religious, shouts out in anger about or against a particular subject, it's usually a sign of the inner turmoil of the
person crying out around that very
issue.
DO listen to your own voice or the Church on social, political and economic
issues, and allow
people to justify their views on explicitly
religious grounds if they want, as long as it's your religion
with a monotheistic male deity.
The main
issue here is difficult to pin down precisely, but it has to do
with the impression one gains from reading Berger that
people act like amateur philosophers in constructing their
religious views.
It seems to my perceptions that you might be having a personal identity conundrum... Speaking from experience; many folks seem unable to cope
with individualized rationalizing complexities... Giving up attempting, toward understanding social austerities which encompass individualism, gives
people their identification of oneness... Individualisms are set upon the relativities of quaint somberness
issues in daily moderations...
Religious identities are as emotionalized labels giving people an ability to pause and reflect upon judgmental reasoning... Whether or not, religious agendas are servicing and served with ever those willing to
Religious identities are as emotionalized labels giving
people an ability to pause and reflect upon judgmental reasoning... Whether or not,
religious agendas are servicing and served with ever those willing to
religious agendas are servicing and served
with ever those willing to serve...
And yet today, many
people are silencing and shaming others for addressing systemic
issues or individual behavioral concerns
with religious leadership, calling for grace — as if grace and accountability are mutually exclusive.
Almost every single encounter Jesus had
with the
religious people was because they had theologically «correct» answers to pressing cultural and
religious issues, but which Jesus soundly rejected in favor of loving and helping
people.
Religious values and views play a significant role in the lives of
people as they deal
with issues affecting their communities.
The problem for the young ministers, first of all, was to establish some kind of communication
with East Harlem, to overcome the cultural barriers and get to know
people at the level of our common humanity where the genuine
religious issues arise.
I too am tired of selective appeals to «biblical marriage» that tend to glorify the modern nuclear family as the only ideal and render real
people with real lives into a mere political /
religious «
issue,» and I too am reluctant to support an establishment that sends part of its profits to the Family Research Council, an organization that has fed blatant misinformation about homosexuality to Christians for years.
Be done
with Feds in personal life of consenting adults and stop making this a
religious issue people have rights to their own
religious beliefs as well as personal beliefs.
People of other
religious traditions have wrestled
with issues similar to those concerning their Christian counterparts when confronting economics and theology.
Tell these
people not to goto
religious organizations for learning / working if they have an
issue with it.
I'm not the most
religious person, but it is evident to me that the minority in this country have an
issue with the majority having such beliefs.
For years
people have complained,
with considerable justice, about the laundry list of
issues on which the USCC lobbies Congress, a list that has too often lent credibility to the complaint that it is, as the monsignor says, the
religious lobby of the Democratic Party.
On the basis of experience from a variety of sources a
religious person and the theologian formulate a theory which, like any theory dealing
with complex
issues in science, is a matter of weighing one experience against another, together
with much subjective judgment.
Such consultation may occur at many levels: consultation to pastors concerning problem clients
with whom they are working; consultation to a pastor and the church administration regarding human relation problems in the congregation; consultation to groups or programs in a congregation that are designed to assist
people in the church; consultation to a local, regional, or denominational administration in regard to evaluation of
religious candidates, human relations problems in the administration, or denominational programming related to mental health
issues; consultation to a group of churches who sponsor a joint community program.
And his efforts to explore these
issues always began
with and never strayed far from the way
religious people actually talk (cf. my forthcoming book Ian Ramsey: To Speak Responsibly of God).
Posting links of
religious people who you agree
with on this
issue does nothing to refute points I made.
Today,
with millions of averagely happy and well - adjusted gay and lesbian
people in Britain, the Core
Issues Trust must be one of the last hold - outs for this
religious - inspired gobbledygook.
But
people also have a responsibility to discuss
religious issues with sensitivity.
People with diabetes should have an assessment of their individual needs, including cultural and
religious issues, during their hospital stay including whether they are able to and wish to self manage during their stay.
«The
issue is that basically unclaimed bodies are being released without any sort of consideration of the
person's possible
religious or personal beliefs on whether or not they want to be used for such practices,» said Queens Assemblyman Michael Simanowitz, who sponsored the legislation
with state Sen. Simcha Felder (D - Brooklyn).
Now, I'm not naive and realize this
issue is controversial for a number of
people, particularly those who feel the ruling is in conflict
with their
religious beliefs.
So what role is there for religiously trained
people — chaplains — to be endorsed by the federal government as the only personnel that they will fund to provide advice and care to children from diverse cultural,
religious and ethnic backgrounds in need — to young
people struggling
with issues of sexual orientation and identity,
with bullying or family violence, death and trauma?
«Hopefully millions of
people taking a stance on this
issue through their involvement
with religious communities will resonate
with politicians.»
The central
issue in that case was whether a provision in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which required employers to provide employees
with health coverage for contraception, infringed on Hobby Lobby's rights under the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which prohibits Congress from enacting a law that burdens a
person's exercise of their religion.
«Although the sincerity of a
person's belief that a
religious practice must be observed is relevant to whether the
person's right to freedom of religion is at
issue, an infringement of this right can not be established without objective proof of an interference
with the observance of that practice.
Some
people choose Christian counseling over other types of counseling and mental health treatment because they are more comfortable
with managing mental health
issues or personal problems in a
religious context.
A
person with «sole custody» has sole legal custody, and does not need to include the other parent in the decision making process things like health, education, or
religious upbringing
issues of the children.