The parties had no material legal issues other than that the wife wanted a restraining order
issued against the husband, and the husband resisted the issuance of the order.
The petition was
issued against a husband who then challenged the divorce being processed in England and Wales on the basis that he abandoned his domicile of origin in Wales and instead acquired a domicile of choice in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and therefore the Courts of England and Wales had no jurisdiction to entertain the divorce petition.
Not exact matches
I think we can have a Mosque or Islamic center at ground zero when we can build a Christian church in Mecca or when Mullahs
issue a fatwa
against the Taliban for murdering a pregnant women for «adultery» or killing doctors trying to help the Afgan people or for cutting the ears and nose off a young 13 year old girl for trying to run away from an abusive «
husband».
Pushing back
against her critics, Melania Trump said Tuesday she's committed to fighting cyberbullying despite the knocks she's gotten for taking on the
issue when her
husband regularly uses Twitter to berate his foes and call them names.
(from NY Times) the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court -
issued protective order
against a violent
husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
ALBANY — Sean Eldridge is a self - funder, a good Democrat on the
issues, has the blessing of party bosses for his run for Congress
against Chris Gibson, can talk about creating jobs with an investment fund and, again, as the
husband of Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, has more than enough money to self - fund an aggressive campaign.
I disagree with the
issues of the doctor scene being obvious or clunky... it too goes
against type... Dean is «playing» the angry
husband when Cindy says he needs to be a «man»... he keeps asking «is this being a man?»
Naturally, the
husband was
against this outcome: He claimed that in light of his bankruptcy the order should not be given effect — especially since there were significant and serious custody / parenting
issues outstanding, not to mention efforts on the wife's part to exclude him from the child's life.
This time, however, the question for the Bankruptcy Court (which does not hear Family Law
issues per se) was whether a
husband who declared bankruptcy a mere week after having a hefty spousal and child support order levied
against him should be allowed to have that bankruptcy discharged.
Collaborative law gave her and her
husband the opportunity to discuss
issues in a way that prevented them from going to war
against one another.