Sentences with phrase «issued by litigants»

Not exact matches

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Alaska injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

These were to address one or more of eight issues seen as important to courts: form - filling — making court documents more accessible to litigants in person; order drafting — creating orders that are more likely to be accepted by courts; continuous online hearing — challenging the question of whether a court is a place or a service; argument - building — to aid non-lawyers in creating well - structured arguments, distinguishing fact from law; outcome prediction — using technology to answer the natural question «what are my chances of winning?»

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Georgia injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

It impacts on the decision and strategy on whether to litigate even with a meritorious claim, and is becoming an issue of access to justice, especially for impecunious litigants who are disproportionally affected by the recovery gap.

A trial judge may assist litigants by directing them away from irrelevancies and indicating what issues are determinative of the matter, or by asking the litigant to focus their questioning of witnesses on legally relevant factual issues.»

About 18 % of judges and lawyers said that there is no difference in the results achieved by self - represented litigants on support issues, about 20 % said that there is no difference in the results on support issues and about 13 % said that there is no difference in the results for property division.

Those savings include (1) greater workplace productivity on the part of litigants whose stress levels would be significantly reduced by a reduction in the cost and the truncation in the time they spend in the litigation maelstrom, (2) less domestic upset for the same reasons, and (3) fewer visits to health care professionals for stress related issues again for the same reasons.

N O T I C E It is notified for the information of all concerned Advocates / Advocates - on - Record / litigant public that the Court Programme issued by Dr. Faqir Hussain, Former Registrar on Orders of Former Chief Justice on 03.11.2007 conveying sitting of the Hon» ble Judges stands cancelled and withdrawn.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Tennessee injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Missouri injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Experts are hired by litigants to testify about issues that require technical or scientific knowledge.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a California injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

As amicus, Mark appears on motions involving self represented litigants, in order to assist the court by raising potential issues that the self - represented litigant may not be aware of, or may have overlooked.

I agree that the case — a startling claim by a group of litigants that need to be taken seriously (even if their method for getting the issue before the courts, i.e., before themselves in the first instance, is unorthodox)-- deserves to be noticed and that other provinces, including Alberta, will be affected if their claim is successful.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a North Carolina injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

National Jurist also cites Chicago - Kent's Justice and Technology Practicum, which focuses on document assembly and automation tools; its cloud - based A2J Author software, developed by students to break down complex legal information for self - represented litigants; and the Chicago - Kent Law Lab, where students use innovative technology and business processes to solve legal issues.

This program brings volunteer lawyers into Chambers, where they act as «amicus curiae» and help the court understand the issues related and the positions taken by unrepresented litigants.

This policy promotes the interests of litigants generally by saving them the expense of trial of disputed issues, and it reduces the strain upon an already overburdened provincial Court system».11

The aim is to provide an online platform for the range of people, organisations and institutions involved in seeking to address the issues raised by what... Continue reading Self Represented Litigants in England and Wales: the Litigants in Person Network →

As Parliament did not clear empower the executive to levy fees that would prevent litigants from accessing tribunals, and as the fees at issue had precisely that effect, they must be held not to have been authorized by the statute under whose purported authority they were imposed.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a foreign injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

«Although the issues at stake in this action involve the private rights of the litigants, the motion relief sought by the plaintiff involves much broader considerations that may impact the rights of other parties involved in motor vehicle accident cases as well as possibly the rights of citizens of Ontario to sit as jurors in those cases,» the judge wrote.

If the request for disclosure of protected health information were not accompanied by a court order, covered entities could not have disclosed the information requested unless a request authorized by law had been made by the agency requesting the information or by legal counsel representing a party to litigation, with a written statement certifying that the protected health information requested concerned a litigant to the proceeding and that the health condition of the litigant was at issue at the proceeding.

Licensed Paraprofessionals to assist Oregonians facing Family Law (where 80 % of Oregon litigants are not represented by counsel) and Landlord - Tenant (where 85 % of Oregon Residential Landlord - Tenant litigants are unrepresented) issues;

Beyond the dramatic, recent example provided by the Volkswagen case, legal holds remain a common source of issues for litigants, particularly with regard to the spoliation that can follow an ineffective or nonexistent legal hold and the question of whether reasonable efforts to preserve were taken.

The issue of OPCA litigants was addressed by Associate Chief Justice Rooke in his decision in Meads v. Meads.

To preclude a civil litigant from relitigating an issue previously found against him in a criminal prosecution is less severe than to preclude him from relitigating such an issue in successive civil trials, for there are rigorous safeguards against unjust conviction, including the requirements of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and of a unanimous verdict, the right to counsel, and a record paid for by the state on appeal.

I fervently hope that the report of the Bonkalo Review will recommend access by family litigants to trained and regulated paralegals who could ``... conduct an intake interview with a family client, noting where a (specified) complex issue may need to be referred to a family lawyer... (and) could complete the application for divorce, the response to an application, and prepare and finalize an affidavit.»

First, Committee members became more aware of the relevant issues and difficulties encountered by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander litigants when accessing and using the Court and were able to share this knowledge with the rest of the judiciary.

When considered in light of the relatively lower uptake of dispute resolution services by way of Family Relationship Centres (as reported earlier by Indigenous litigants - see Table 7) the results suggest that the accessibility of dispute resolution services may be an issue for Indigenous families.

Educating the Judiciary on Self - Represented Litigant Issues By Hon. Fern A. Fisher Appendix: Self - represented Litigation Network Introduction to Judicial Education Curricula: Guide to Materials