Sentences with phrase «issued by private entities»

The programme was supposed to apply «temporarily» but without an explicit limitation in time, and allowed both national central banks and the ECB to buy on the secondary market eligible marketable debt instruments issued by the central governments or public entities of the Member States whose currency is the Euro; as well as on the primary and secondary markets eligible marketable debt instruments issued by private entities incorporated in the Euro area.

Not exact matches

The fund under normal circumstances invests in at least 65 % of its total assets in a diversified portfolio of fixed income instruments of varying maturities, including bonds issued by both U.S. and non-U.S. public - or private - sector entities.

Private student loans are generally issued by banks and other private entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of exPrivate student loans are generally issued by banks and other private entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of exprivate entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of expenses.

«If the acquirer is a private entity there is unlikely to be any regulatory issues relating to their use — but by the same token it is generally accepted that private equity will not pay a reverse break fee,» said Mercer.

Global bond funds invest in a wide variety of bonds issued by various public and private entities around the world, including sovereign governments, international agencies, state and local authorities, and private corporations.

Whichever is right» whether marriage is or is not a purely private matter in which the state has no abiding interest» the deeper and more immediate danger of the marriage issue for Christians is its potential use by gay activists to undermine the autonomy of the Church and other religious entities.

While in this case the poll was conducted by a private entity, was not done at state expense and Malloy has yet to form a campaign committee, ConnCAN is a registered lobbyist and that brings a whole series of ethics issues into play.

(a), discrimination includes (I) the purchase or lease of an over-the-road bus which does not comply with the regulations issued under section 306 (a)(2) by a private entity which provides transportation of individuals and which is not primarily engaged in the business of transporting people, and (II) any other failure of such entity to comply with such regulations.

Private student loans are issued by banks and other private entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of exPrivate student loans are issued by banks and other private entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of exprivate entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of expenses.

Private student loans are generally issued by banks and other private entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of exPrivate student loans are generally issued by banks and other private entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of exprivate entities and are used to pay for tuition, room & board, and other types of expenses.

They may invest in U.S. and non-U.S. securities and in securities issued by both public and private entities.

The insurance and guarantees are issued by governmental entities, private insurers and the mortgage poolers.

MBS may also be issued by private issuers, generally originators and investors in mortgage loans, including savings associations, mortgage banks, commercial banks, and special purpose entities (collectively, private lenders).

Is STARE DECISIS (precedent) still part of the law in Ontario?The herein issue was dealt with in 2001, by the SCC, in a finding that the Charter does not apply to PRIVATE entities (TWU) and the Charter remains unchanged!The LSUC and lower Courts are bound by this precedent!Furthermore, the LSUC should not have proceeded herein, without specific authorization from a general Referendum and, at least for the sake of appearances, ON THIS ISSUE, the Bench, should have all been from out of Province, having absolutely no connection to the LSUC, as former Members, Benchers, issue was dealt with in 2001, by the SCC, in a finding that the Charter does not apply to PRIVATE entities (TWU) and the Charter remains unchanged!The LSUC and lower Courts are bound by this precedent!Furthermore, the LSUC should not have proceeded herein, without specific authorization from a general Referendum and, at least for the sake of appearances, ON THIS ISSUE, the Bench, should have all been from out of Province, having absolutely no connection to the LSUC, as former Members, Benchers, ISSUE, the Bench, should have all been from out of Province, having absolutely no connection to the LSUC, as former Members, Benchers, etc..

We believe it is appropriate to allow disclosure of protected health information without authorization to private entities only: For purposes that the FDA has, in effect, identified as national priorities by issuing regulations or express directions requiring such disclosure; or if such disclosure is necessary for a product recall.