Sentences with phrase «issued court order»

Earlier this year, the IRS issued a court order requesting access to the records of more than 500,000 users who traded cryptocurrencies on California - based digital exchange Coinbase.

A defensive driving course / driver retraining course is often required of drivers who commit certain types of traffic offenses, drivers who have an excess of driving record points and those who are issued a court order.

Therefore, in accordance with the terms of our privacy statement we will not disclose to any third party for any reason either the contents of or any facts relating to the contents of a user's email or any other communication a user sends to us; provided, however, such disclosure will be made when required to do so by law or by properly issued court order or when good - faith belief exists that such action is legally necessary to: (1) comply with the law or comply with legal process served on California Legal Research, Inc.; (2) protect and defend the legitimate business interests, rights or property of California Legal Research, Inc., its users, customers, or affiliates; or (3) act in an emergency to protect the personal safety of CALRI.com users or the public.

The FBI recently issued a court order to break into the iPhone owned by the San Bernardino shooter, who killed 14 people back in December — but Apple's CEO believes what it's being asked to do is «the software equivalent of cancer,» since a back door would severely undermine the privacy and security of everyone who uses an iPhone or iPad.

«This prohibition may place city agencies in a position to disregard a lawfully issued court order.

The company had agreed to secretly help the U.S. government surveil the emails of many of its users after it was issued a court order to do so, according to The New York Times.

In other words, your Agreement is not enforceable until the judge issues a Court Order.

This 8 - hour judge - ordered Intermediate Driver Improvement course is 100 % online and is also approved by Florida's Courts for instances when a Traffic Court Judge or Hearing Officer issues a Court Order requiring you to take a traffic class.

He called on the private sector to find ways that would allow them to «respond to lawfully issued court orders, in a way that is consistent with both the rule of law and strong cybersecurity.»

State of Montana — Great Falls, MT Judicial Assistant [2015 — 2017] • Filed and copied correspondence • Answered questions about court proceedings • Issued court orders • Transcribed court correspondence • Managed schedule trials, motions, and court hearings

A Wisconsin circuit court must review and approve the signed, written agreement before issuing a court order to officially end the spouses» marriage by stipulated divorce.

Before issuing a court order for child custody, the judge considers the best interests of the child and the reasonableness of any agreement.

Family law judges issue court orders over child custody of minor children during legal proceedings, including legal separation and divorce.

Married parents share equal parental rights over a child during the marriage and throughout separation unless a judge issues a court order to the contrary.

When they go through a trial and a judge issues a court order giving sole legal custody to the other parent and limiting physical access to a child, these parents are not likely to roll over and passively obey.

Not exact matches

According to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), a firm has to procure a court order before repossessing a vehicle belonging to a member of the military, a law that was established to protect soldiers and other military personnel from having to deal with legal issues while they're actively serving.

Courts are often willing to issue a cease - and - desist order and sometimes even assess damages.

Last May the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sided with the plaintiffs and issued an injunction against the order.

The Trump administration has said it will appeal the federal appeals court ruling and possibly issue a new order.

President Trump's original travel order, issued seven days after the inauguration, was blocked by court rulings.

The case was brought to court in order to put a line under the issue and gain clarification one way or the other.

After the most recent order was issued, the same challengers who sued to stop the earlier bans went back to court.

The court order, issued on Thursday, came in response to a flood of individuals seeking a piece of an estate some have valued at more than $ 500 million, left by Prince when he died unexpectedly in April at the age of 57, apparently without a will.

A July 2015 Supreme Court decision in favor of anti-abortion groups issued a temporary restraining order halting the distribution of birth control implants after 400,000 of the devices had already been distributed.

When lenders who issues deeds of trust want to foreclose on a home, they are not required to get a court order to do so.

Law enforcement officials who believe that notification would jeopardize an investigation should obtain an appropriate court order or other valid legal process that specifically precludes Member notification, such as an order issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2705 (b).

Check out this free search tool and find information about individuals that have been named in SEC court actions or administrative proceedings and had judgments or orders issued against them.

A lender who issues a deed of trust is not required to get a court order to foreclose on a home.

The judge said in a 91 - page decision that, while the Army Corps substantially complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, federal permits issued for the pipeline violated the law in some respects, saying in a court order the Corps did not «adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental justice.»

As you recall, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an order vacating Rule 151A under the Securities Act of 1933.

The lawsuit was filed a week after Mr. Cohen initiated arbitration proceedings, but the court papers did not say what was at issue or refer to the restraining order.

The court considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors of YAC and ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held on 22 February in the Supreme Ccourt considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors of YAC and ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held on 22 February in the Supreme CourtCourt.

The High Court of Delhi has issued a notice to India's central bank over its order barring banks from engaging with cryptocurrency services.

One might have thought that that would be the end of the matter, but instead Burnaby commenced this action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking a declaration (at para 13) «that the National Energy Board does not have the constitutional jurisdiction to issue an order to the City of Burnaby that directs or limits the City of Burnaby in the enforcement of its bylaws.»

On April 13, 2016, the Court issued an order (the «Meeting Order»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and Arrangeorder (the «Meeting Order»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and ArrangeOrder»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and Arrangement.

On March 14, 2016 the Court issued an order, amending and extending the Notice of Objection Bar Date (as set out in the Claims Procedure Order dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may Oorder, amending and extending the Notice of Objection Bar Date (as set out in the Claims Procedure Order dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may OOrder dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may OrderOrder.

On the same date, the Court also issued an order (the «Employee Representative Order») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceedorder (the «Employee Representative Order») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceedOrder») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceedOrder) in the insolvency proceedings.

On December 8, 2015, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including February 12, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including February 12, Order) until and including February 12, 2016.

On September 26, 2016, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including January 20, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including January 20, Order) until and including January 20, 2017.

On March 14, 2016, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including April 15, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including April 15, Order) until and including April 15, 2016.

On February 12, 2016, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including March 15, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including March 15, Order) until and including March 15, 2016.

April 26, 2017 On April 26, 2017, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including September 29, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including September 29, Order) until and including September 29, 2017.

On June 2, 2016, the Court issued an order (the «Sanction and Vesting Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19, order (the «Sanction and Vesting Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19, Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19, 2016.

On June 11, 2015, the Court issued an order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 2015.

On August 14, 2015, the Court issued an order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including November 16, order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including November 16, Order) until and including November 16, 2015.

January 25, 2018 On January 25, 2018, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including May 15, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including May 15, Order) until and including May 15, 2018.

On October 30, 2015, the Court issued an order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including December 11, order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including December 11, Order) until and including December 11, 2015.

Two months in the past the Supreme Court of Israel issued an injunction order forbidding one of many greatest banks within the nation from halting the account exercise of an area bitcoin alternate.

According to Reuters, Judge Kimba Wood issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Alibabacoin Foundation, and ordered the defendants (including ABBC Foundation's CEO Jason Daniel Paul Phillip and CTO Hassan Abbas) to explain to the court «why an order should not be issued granting a preliminary injunction,» which would prohibit the defendants» usage of the Alibaba trademarks anywhere in the United States.

Ct.), in an issue of first impression in Delaware, the Chancery Court ordered the production of the chairman's 10b5 - 1 stock trading plan.