Though the accused may have a surety for bail, a domestic assault charge can result in unique
issues at bail hearings.
Not exact matches
At a June 17th
hearing exploring our current
bail system, the New York Civil Liberties Union
issued these, among other findings, to the NYC Council Committee on Courts and Legal Services:
It includes analysis on emerging
issues in federal criminal law and practical advice on navigating challenging
issues at all stages of federal criminal proceedings, from the
bail hearing through trial and appeal.
Specific topics which have been covered in recent conferences include judicial ethics; interpreters; delivering reasons for judgment; assessing credibility; social media; technology and search warrants; managing a provincial offence trial; effectively communicating an oral judgment; risk assessment and indicators of lethality
at bail hearings; the Youth Criminal Justice Act; eye - witness identification; conducting pre-trials; specific
issues at trials of regulatory offences; fly - in - courts, residential schools; application of Gladue principles; mistrials and bias; accident reconstruction; search warrant
issues; domestic violence
issues; orders for examination under the Mental Health Act; child apprehension warrants under the Child and Family Services Act; evidentiary
issues; discrimination and harassment in the workplace; stress management; and pre-retirement planning.
R. v. Ashini (J.B.) 2015 NLPC 1711 Civil Rights — Criminal Law Summary:
At issue on this
bail hearing was whether the accused should be released, as well as the proper interpretation of s. 516 (1) of the Criminal Code in the context of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Pearson (1992), R. v. Morales (1992), and R. v. Hall (2002) and the judicial reality that existed for years in Labrador.