One of the biggest
issues for people going zero waste is that their loved ones are not interested in going zero waste.
Not exact matches
They make themselves into the «
go - to»
person for particular
issues or topics - even if they don't necessarily have a high position in the hierarchy.
It's very easy to roll one's eyes at the earnest «we're gonna fix it,
for real, this time» proclamations of politicians when history has proven this to be an
issue that sits, perennially, maddeningly, pretty low on the priority list of the
people most equipped to solve it.
Another
issue is that the bank usually advises that the company split its stock as many times as it needs to to get the price per share down to around $ 10 before it
goes public, logic being that
people like to buy in round lots (100 share purchases) and $ 1000 is a workable number
for most
people.
But in most of the offices, Canton said, he was always the
go - to
person for computer
issues.
They should try and find an imam with a respect
for everyone and a grip on secular society instead of some macho bigot who is
going to further polarize
people on the
issue of the Park51 project.
When a
person like this starts believing that god meant
for him to
go to Iraq, etc., is when you start having
issues.
he IS grasping at straws since the singel parent thing wasnt an
issue... secondly... you apparently need to
go to school and learn that there IS a difference between a woman and a man and that children benefit from BOTH... and hwo a man loves a woman as nature intended... its
people like you who are reason
for high divorce rates in USA, because they don tknow what love or marriage is..
But I have a huge
issue when religion is foisted upon me, it is used to make public policy, and used to inflict injury and death to
people who are deemed «unworthy» (like gays or blacks or
people who won't
go along
for the ride).
This struggle is even wider than the media report, and
goes beyond the
issues of the divorced and remarried and of pastoral care
for homosexual
people.
It can be easy to criticize the way some
people have
gone about fighting
for justice in various women's
issues, but Christians should respond to even misguided justice efforts graciously in Jesus» name.
I'm sorry if I
went on at quite a length at this, but I hope I impressed that this is a serious and deep
issue in the understanding of the nature of God, some might not be in any position to accept it as true, but it is not to be rejected out of hand as a silly or tricky little thing that
people are foolish
for falling into believing.
That used to not be such an
issue because American society was very modern (as opposed to post modern) and
people were used to
going to the doctor,
going to the movies, using a certain spoon
for soup, not wearing white before Labor Day.
Sister Mary Corita chose to answer these questions with the words of William Sloane Coffin: «Because we love the world, we pray now, O [God],
for grace to quarrel with it, O Thou whose lover's quarrel with the world is the history of the world... Lord, grant us grace to quarrel with the worship of success and power... to quarrel with all that profanes and trivializes [
people] and separates them... number us, we beseech Thee, in the ranks of those who
went forth from this place longing only
for those things
for which Thou dost make us long, [those]
for whom the complexity of the
issues only served to renew their zeal to deal with them, [those] who alleviated pain by sharing it; and [those] who were always willing to risk something big
for something good... O God, take our minds and think through them, take our lips and speak through them.
regardless of what is the
issue of the bible, the fact that it influences the lives of billions of
people for meliniums or thousands of years, that magnitude of effect is beyond doubt that it is the will of God.He guided the events in history
for a purpose, a process of evolution that will be the foundation of another cyclic event
for the future of humanity.this has been
going on
for 13.7 billion years, and this will
go on
for billons of years more.Will you be part of history.?
Similarly, I hope that if you've decided to vote
for Clinton, you've spoken out concerning the ongoing ethics problems that
go back decades and now continue to surface every day, and her stance on abortion and many more
issues that defile all
people who are made in the image of God.
There are some fires in your state but if god is
going to help
people that pray
for help I think there would be more important
issues that need his help.
When
people are left out, when they're neglected, when they're not supported, and when they're not given the love they need to grow, it becomes an incubator
for trafficking, and this refugee crisis, if we want to be serious about ending slavery, we can not ignore them, we can not ignore our support
for this
issue in that space, because otherwise, we're
going to have to deal with it
for years to come.
@ observer: 1) if saying «i disagree with your position» means a group of
people are
going to attempt to get you fired, it is disingenuous to claim one is «free to speak» — especially when the company
for which one works supposedly has NO stance on the
issue.
I think an employer has a moral obligation to be concerned about the welfare of one's employee's — maybe not legally required (to a degree)-- i wish it were simple that
people could just quit an employer that had no concern
for the
people so that enterprise would
go under or wise up — i think though employers are actually more upset about money instead of morals — women and doctors should be deciding such
issues — i do not know y i even bother posting since i know these posts will not actually affect anything --
For this very
issue, I try out update my personal blogs almost like I am speaking to a
person or discussing with that audience directly web site esteem it helps participate
people greater than publishing content formally especially when my blog situated surrounding the
goings ons, regular thoughts and analysis about this to some degree controversial
issue.
There we
go again, shut up this hypocritical rightwingers.Only at election time do rear their ugly heads up to be seen and heard.It's time to unleash the CRACKKIN, the monster that the IRS
people use on unruly religious groups, exemption is like a death sentence to these groups.Most of these religious leaders are wolves in sheeps clothing, selling their political poison to anyone in their flocks.They push the envelope on the seperation of church and state
issue, seeing how far they can
go.Pastors and ministers would never speak politics like this years ago, that was taaboo.Now
people like Robertson, Graham, and the rest, flaunt their ideaology both religious and political at every event.They don't care about the legal consequences, they have LAWYERS, perishioners pay
for that.
My last point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national
issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to
people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government...
go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to
people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting
for the next big lotto...
Let me know how that
goes for you (waiting on
people to fix their own self made
issues).
Rather than meet simply to pray, meet to
go serve the community, and before you
go, spend a few minutes in prayer
for eyes to see and ears to hear the needs and
issues that
people in the neighborhood are dealing with.
I looked on the internet
for more info about the
issue and found most
people will
go along with your views on this website.
Hi Katherine, Congrats
for you website, is excellent, and the way you explain everything step by step, I already started a detox process that also helped me to lose 12 pound, have about 20 to
go, Only one thing that i consider important to highlight, I am gluten intolerant so
people that also suffer from this
issue knows how picky we become with food, Please be aware that Oat has gluten on it... so is not that beneficial
for us, is better to reduce as much as possible, thank you in advance
for all your amazing comments and suggestions,
I checked on the web
for additional information about the
issue and found most
people will
go along with your views on this site.
Time
for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of
for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how
people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous
for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order
for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as
for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal
for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money
for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul...
for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this
issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid
for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up
for half the price he eventually
went to Juve
for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not
going to press their current teams to let them
go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness
for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Former Blues winger Pienaar, the Club's first International Ambassador,
went along to The
People's Hub to meet participants who attend the charity's weekly coaching session for refugees, asylum seekers and people currently experiencing, or have experienced, homelessness or addiction i
People's Hub to meet participants who attend the charity's weekly coaching session
for refugees, asylum seekers and
people currently experiencing, or have experienced, homelessness or addiction i
people currently experiencing, or have experienced, homelessness or addiction
issues.
This is the
person who's
going to be your biggest cheerleader and so if you're having challenges with breastfeeding this will be the
person who says «Well let's figure out how to solve these
issues so that way we can make this process so much comfortable
for you».
For some reason, even though this is something that has gone on for centuries, people still have issues with women «exposing» themselves, rather than looking at it as a child eati
For some reason, even though this is something that has
gone on
for centuries, people still have issues with women «exposing» themselves, rather than looking at it as a child eati
for centuries,
people still have
issues with women «exposing» themselves, rather than looking at it as a child eating.
She is frequently the
go - to
person on
issues of parenting
for both print media and radio.
I think some of the
issue with the Cheaper Imported diapers being made
for some
people, is not just that they may / may not be affecting someones patent — I think the bigger
issue for me personally is the fact that we don't know the conditions in which these diapers are made (of course that
goes with anything we own that is made in China), so we are saving money but at what cost — so someone else gets paid peanuts barely supporting their family?
I -LCB- looked checked -RCB--LCB- on the internet on the web on the net -RCB--LCB-
for more info
for more information to find out more to learn more
for additional information -RCB- about the
issue and found -LCB- most individuals most
people -RCB- will
go along with your views on -LCB- this website this site this web site -RCB-.
For instance, your teen could stop dwelling on what other
people are saying or
go directly to the source and confront the
issue.
It ultimately didn't
go through, but the debate that ensued illustrates what an emotional and powerful
issue this is
for many
people.
I think a lot of the
issue with this bill and this entire
issue is that there's just a lack of education about the need
for it and I think this why not enough has been done yet, but when
people do find out about all the struggles and the
issues and the real health concerns that
go along with women having to pump in places like bathrooms that are unsanitary that
people do want to help, that they do want conditions to get better.
I say all that to say, that when I did work and I pumped at work, pumping at work I only
went into a room because I knew other
people had
issues but I could pump at my desk, what up
for?
It could be tricky admitting you're wrong about certain things, but in some
people's cases, they're just too far
gone and have been behaving the same way
for so long, it'll be near on impossible to address and ultimately rectify the
issues.
In practice the line between
person and project blurs a little since
issues important enough to bother with and having few enough plans to make a reasonable vote normally have individual champions or leading thinkers who make the explanation to the voters what voting
for that plan means, and nobody wins votes without some hints about what direction they are planning to
go in.
People might like what he is saying but not how he is saying it... once he starts talking nicely the problem
goes away and it's too late
for the Democrats to attack him on
issues....
For activist nonprofits or unions, it's much the same —
people who
go to the trouble of googling your organization or
going to your website are probably already likeminded (or hate - surfing), unless you're running ad campaigns or have seo optimized on some
issues.
If the governor is
going to weigh in, he is
going to have to be prepared to talk about things like how do you get royalties
for a book signing, how do you have outside income, how do you pass that income, how do you deal with
issues that most
people won't understand but may not pay attention to the way they do right now?
«Again, that's
going to be an
issue for the voters to decide, decide how they feel about it, and to select the
person that they think is the best
for the job of comptroller,» Gillibrand said.»
For his part, Schreibman argues that his upbringing — he was the first person in his family to go to college — and his legal work on security issues make him best suited for an election he predicts will be about the economy and national securi
For his part, Schreibman argues that his upbringing — he was the first
person in his family to
go to college — and his legal work on security
issues make him best suited
for an election he predicts will be about the economy and national securi
for an election he predicts will be about the economy and national security.
However, you seem to imply that just by announcing the proposed cut (sometime last year I think) it would somehow
go directly into the consciousness of voters who aren't political obsessives and so make a difference to the LD ratings The truth is that
for the LD's it will take a general election campaign and Clegg / Cable / Hune hammering the
issue home in debate after debate after debate
for it to register with
people who don't pay much attention to the ups and downs of everyday politics, let alone the tax proposals of the 3rd party.
You're not
going to be able to fight every
issue because frankly you'd reduce your impact and the influence you have
for local
people.
Those numbers don't include the ripple effect as
people forward it on to colleagues and others, and they're also destined to
go up as the promotional campaign chugs along (press release hits the wires tomorrow,
for instance, and the ebook should have a mention in the next
issue of Campaigns & Elections magazine).
«If a mayor, any mayor, is not doing his job,
for one reason or another, or can't do their job,
for one reason or another, or is playing politics with an
issue,
for one reason or another, I'm not
going to let the
people suffer and pay the price,» he said.