Not exact matches
Then Obama's State of the Union
speech, which sounded off alarm bells
in Ottawa and Alberta by unexpectedly bringing up climate change, an
issue largely ignored during the president's electoral
campaign.
The promise of an
In / Out referendum under a Conservative Government late in the next Parliament will draw much of the poison that has plagued the party over the EU issue since Margaret Thatcher's Bruges speech - by making it clear to those MPs and party members opposed to EU membership that in such circumstances they will have an opportunity to campaign for a No vot
In / Out referendum under a Conservative Government late
in the next Parliament will draw much of the poison that has plagued the party over the EU issue since Margaret Thatcher's Bruges speech - by making it clear to those MPs and party members opposed to EU membership that in such circumstances they will have an opportunity to campaign for a No vot
in the next Parliament will draw much of the poison that has plagued the party over the EU
issue since Margaret Thatcher's Bruges
speech - by making it clear to those MPs and party members opposed to EU membership that
in such circumstances they will have an opportunity to campaign for a No vot
in such circumstances they will have an opportunity to
campaign for a No vote.
The citizen - interrogators generated the most diverse set of questions
in any of the presidential debates to date and challenged the candidates to break out of the rhetoric of their
campaign speeches and to address sometimes uncomfortable
issues, such as race, gender, religion and their own vulnerabilities.
In her first speech as the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee, Clinton will criticize Trump's positions on women's issues — a signal to the Democratic base that she intends to anchor the general election in the same slate of progressive issues she campaigned on in the primar
In her first
speech as the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee, Clinton will criticize Trump's positions on women's
issues — a signal to the Democratic base that she intends to anchor the general election
in the same slate of progressive issues she campaigned on in the primar
in the same slate of progressive
issues she
campaigned on
in the primar
in the primary.
Unfortunately freedom of
speech is contingent to how much money you have given that the media is itself a business that has to make profits as well, so a «lobbyist» like this comes to this program without any ethics, without any remorse but with a lot of money as well to openly acknowledge that: yes, we put money
in this governor's elections, we are expecting he pay us back and will stand on our side of the equation, and yes, we have collected (very fast) the private necessary money to run a public relations
campaign (of lies if necessary) to guarantee that our privileges are well kept; and he finds a free stand to speak out freely and without appropriate response As far as Liz, I'm not sure if it is only a being naïve
issue.
Soon after Obama's
speech, Democrats and Republicans who might be angling for his job
in 2016 weighed
in on an
issue that is almost certain to be at the center of their
campaigns.
Steve Schmidt, who was the senior strategist to Senator John McCain of Arizona during his presidential
campaign, said
in a
speech and an interview that Republicans were
in danger of losing these younger voters unless the party comes to appreciate how
issues like gay marriage resonate, or do not resonate, with them.
There has been a great deal of local media focus on homelessness
in the city, and the growing «tent city»
in the centre of Manchester
in particular, and so it was no surprise that Andy Burnham highlighted the
issue in his
campaign launch
speech this week.
Trump's new
campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, explained that the GOP nominee is delaying his immigration
speech in Colorado Thursday because policies surrounding the
issue «should not be rushed.»
Among them he says are the increasing dip
in the credibility of the Electoral Commission, the constituency creation and boundary settings, the determination of who qualifies to vote especially following allegations of some foreign nationals on the voters» register, the bigger
issue of financing the activities of the EC and national elections, ensuring sustainable peace and security before, during and after elections and the use of gate
speech, inflammatory language and dangerous
campaigning tactics.
Gov. Michael S. Dukakis of Massachusetts last week made a Presidential
campaign swing through California speaking on education
issues, but
in his major
speech generally avoided committing himself to any specific proposals for improving schools.
Interestingly, considering how much attention public education
issues received during the recent gubernatorial
campaign, this vital topic did not get much play
in Malloy's
speech, although the governor — who once said that he didn't mind schools teach to the test, «as long as test scores went up,» — did proudly proclaim that his first term accomplishments include that fact that his administration had «raised test scores»
in Connecticut.
Mr. Obama stressed the
issue throughout his
campaign and several times
in his inaugural
speech, mentioning stabilizing climate
in the same breath as preventing nuclear conflict at one point.
Robert Walker, former chairman of the House Science Committee, used a
speech at the 11th Annual Eilene M. Galloway Symposium on Critical
Issues in Space Law here to discuss the space policy he developed for the Trump campaign and to emphasize some issues, like the future of Earth science research, that have been sharply criticized by scientists and o
Issues in Space Law here to discuss the space policy he developed for the Trump
campaign and to emphasize some
issues, like the future of Earth science research, that have been sharply criticized by scientists and o
issues, like the future of Earth science research, that have been sharply criticized by scientists and others.
The
campaign in favour of crime comics was considered pressing enough that the
issue was the subject of the maiden parliamentary
speeches of a number of MPs elected
in the 1949 general election.
The plaintiffs challenged eight restrictions on judicial conduct: 1) the prohibition on judicial candidates
campaigning as a member of a political organization, 2) the prohibition on judicial candidates making
speeches for or against political organizations or candidates, 3) the ban on judicial candidates making contributions to political causes or candidates, 4) the prohibition on judicial candidates from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates for public office, 5) the prohibition on judges from acting as a leader or holding office
in a policitical organization, 6) the prohibition on judicial candidates knowingly or recklessly making false statements during
campaigns, 7) the ban on judicial candidates making misleading statements, and 8) the prohibition on candidates making pledges, promises, or committments
in connection with cases, controversies, or
issues that are likely to come before the court.