A custody evaluation may be full or it may be focused i.e. dealing only with the issue or
issues in dispute rather than all parenting issues.
Not exact matches
The federal government and British Columbia Premier John Horgan, whose province produces about half of Canada's softwood, have been pushing to resolve the
dispute before the start of NAFTA renegotiations
rather than risk having the
issue sidelined or bogged down for months
in the broader trade talks.
As we demonstrated
in our 2015 analysis of the Common Core debate on Twitter, the
dispute about the standards was largely a proxy war over other politically - charged
issues, including opposition to a federal role
in education, which many believe should be the domain of state and local education policy; a fear that the Common Core could become a gateway for access to data on children that might be used for exploitive purposes
rather than to inform educational improvement; a source for the proliferation of testing which has come to oppressively dominate education; a way for business interests to exploit public education for private gain; or a belief that an emphasis on standards reform distracts from the deeper underlying causes of low educational performance, which include poverty and social inequity.
If that's not true — if
in fact, individuals would
rather be guided reliably to conclusions that fit the position of «their team» than be right when they are evaluating
disputed evidence on
issues like climate change and the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine — then what I'm up to is either pointless or (worse) a self - deluded contribution to public manipulation.
It also exhorts WTO members to immediately begin negotiating agreements to resolve the
issues likely to arise from the enactment of national measures on climate change,
rather than leave those
issues to eventual resolution
in dispute settlement, and reminds everyone that WTO rules should not be viewed solely as constraints on efforts to address climate change.
Family law is a unique species of civil law for many reasons, but primarily because of: the frequency with which
disputes brought to court concern social, psychological and emotional
issues rather than legal; the almost complete absence of circumstances
in which a specific legal conclusion invariably and inevitably results from a particular set of facts; and, the range of other areas of the law that may be concurrently applicable, such as contracts, tax, conflicts, real property, negligence, torts and trusts.
Mandatory mediation
in the civil context is perceived as more of a procedural goal to reduce the
issues in dispute or find a reasonable settlement,
rather than a substantive objective of conciliation.
the
issues involved are often intangible and insusceptible to quantification —
rather than dealing with the cost of a collapsed deal or the speed and state of repair of a car involved
in an accident, family law
disputes often concern parenting capacity, employability, personality disorders and wellbeing;
...
Rather than providing the necessary cues and guidance to keep the parties focused on the real
issues in dispute, arbitrators themselves at times fall prey to this deleterious behaviour.
Presumptive Consensual
Dispute Resolution (CDR) assumes that families experiencing separation or divorce are mostly better served if the system encourages them to negotiate rather than fight about issues in dispute betwee
Dispute Resolution (CDR) assumes that families experiencing separation or divorce are mostly better served if the system encourages them to negotiate
rather than fight about
issues in dispute betwee
dispute between them.
This approach provides the individual with protections and places the burden on the parties to resolve their differences about the appropriateness and scope of disclosure as part of the judicial or administrative procedure itself before the order is
issued,
rather than requiring the covered entity to get involved
in evaluating the merits of the
dispute in order to determine whether or not the particular request is appropriate or too broad.
At
issue in this case then was not whether the court had jurisdiction over the
dispute, but
rather whether the plaintiff had properly plead his claim.
The Collaborative Divorce Process is a way to resolve a
disputed divorce by engaging attorneys that agree to assist the parties
in resolving conflict or legal
issues using cooperative strategies
rather than immediately running to the courthouse to file a contested lawsuit.
Sort out
issues with the other parent
rather than involving the children
in your
disputes.
Divorce mediation is a type of alternative
dispute resolution where a neutral third - party divorce mediator helps guide the parties towards a legally binding and enforceable divorce agreement that is fair and workable for both parties,
rather than placing such important
issues in the hands of an anonymous judge whose order may not best represent the interest of both parties.