Although the Court did not rule on the factual
issues in dispute involving «reasonable excuse» and «prejudice» and could not do so in the absence of a full evidentiary record, there was commentary with respect to the concepts of «reasonable excuse» and «prejudice.»
Not exact matches
Trump's trade
issues took a backseat
in 2017 while the White House focused on tax reform, but it's now coming back into the fore: The solar
dispute is among several potential trade decisions that also
involve washing machines, consumer electronics and steel.
Under the precedential system followed
in American jurisprudence, those rulings will be more or less binding on future
disputes involving the same or similar
issues.
On many points, decisions of Islamic religious courts have the force of national law (a touchy
issue when a
dispute involves a Muslim and a non-Muslim, or when one spouse
in an existing marriage converts to Islam and makes the other members of the family subject to Shari'a determinations on matters such as child custody).
Currently, whether the case
involves parenting
issues, financial
issues or both, «each prospective party to a case
in the Family Court of Australia is required to make a genuine effort to resolve the
dispute before starting a case.»
Earlier, Nick Clegg angrily denied suggestions his wife was responsible for his tough stance on the
issue, saying it was «just not on» for the media to
involve his family
in the
dispute.
Briggs removal came after she was
involved in a verbal
dispute with fellow republican legislator Charles Sudbrink over parking
issues at the County Office Building.
«It is our belief that,
in cases
involving scientific evidence, the pre-trial phase should be used to sort out and define as many scientific
issues as possible and to consider... the best means of resolving (for example, by further scientific tests) any matters that may be
disputed.»
Mediation
involves a neutral third party who assists parties
in resolving a
dispute, or at least narrowing the
issues,
in a manner that is acceptable to both sides.
There had been the case of Barnes & Noble being
involved in a
dispute with Spring Design on a trade secret
issue.
Examples of this intersection include: animal custody
disputes in divorces and separations, veterinary malpractice cases, housing
disputes: «no pets» policies and discrimination laws, damages cases
involving the wrongful death or injury to a companion animal, enforceable trusts for companion animals, and criminal law
issues, encompassing domestic violence and anti-cruelty laws.
The Goozex staff members were actively
involved in all aspects of the website, any
disputes or trading
issues were handled quickly.
In other words, the consensus issue is one that was raised by those claiming there was none — you will find that biologists involved in evolution - creationism disputes also frequently point out that scientists have reached consensus on evolution (although perhaps not in those words), and in both cases this protestation is raised only because it is a (true
In other words, the consensus
issue is one that was raised by those claiming there was none — you will find that biologists
involved in evolution - creationism disputes also frequently point out that scientists have reached consensus on evolution (although perhaps not in those words), and in both cases this protestation is raised only because it is a (true
in evolution - creationism
disputes also frequently point out that scientists have reached consensus on evolution (although perhaps not
in those words), and in both cases this protestation is raised only because it is a (true
in those words), and
in both cases this protestation is raised only because it is a (true
in both cases this protestation is raised only because it is a (true!)
Less than a third of those who responded said that the lawyers
in a case were effective
in helping them understand the
dispute and the legal
issues involved.
The Napa attorney, who has both worked
in and concentrated his practice on the wine industry, said the law surrounding it is rife with
issues involving the 21st Amendment, intellectual property, land use planning and international tradeSee his interview on The Wine Trade
Dispute Between the United States and the European Union.
It is interesting to note that the parties were already aware that Mr. Goldman was acting as counsel on other cases that
involved similar
issues as those
in dispute in the arbitration.
Elizabeth Collura is a commercial and corporate litigation associate with Clark Hill Thorp Reed
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where she counsels clients through business
disputes and breakups, as well as litigates civil rights cases and counsels clients on legal
issues involving social media.
Our West Palm Beach business attorneys are experienced at navigating the complex
issues involved in disputes between small business owners, partners, and shareholders.
If you are an owner currently facing a contractual
dispute, business litigation, employment law complaint or would simply like to gain a better understanding of the legal
issues involved in running a small business, give us a call at (858) 707-5858 to schedule your free consultation.
Numerous cases on inconsistencies / differences
in policy language between layers of insurance coverage; coverage
issues in IP cases; coverage
dispute involving broker malpractice allegations; insurance and reinsurance coverage
disputes
Our lawyers have a wealth of experience
in pursuing or defending
disputes in litigation and international arbitration proceedings, such
disputes frequently
involving multiple jurisdictions, or complex technological or engineering
issues.
He acts on a broad spectrum of
disputes work, with expertise
in cases
involving antitrust, intellectual property, regulatory matters and wider corporate
issues.
Dana Chaaban focuses her practice on commercial and construction litigation, where she represents developers, contractors, material suppliers, and design professionals
in disputes involving construction defect claims, delay claims, construction lien
issues, and contract
disputes.
Rachel is also experienced
in handling ERISA matters
involving disputes over long - term disability benefits, individual disability claims, group and individual life insurance
disputes, housing matters, coverage
issues, attorney and accountant malpractice matters.
Represented international contractor
in high profile, multi-party hotel
dispute involving design and construction
issues
Represented cleanroom contractor
in dispute involving Critical Path Method scheduling
issues and assisted
in settlement negotiations following successful depositions of key personnel
Our experienced team, which includes qualified mediators and solicitors with rights of audience
in the higher courts, advises both corporate clients and high - net - worth individuals on tax
disputes, often
involving international
issues.
Further, the confidential arbitration proceedings
in which David has been
involved have frequently given rise to foreign law
issues and
disputes in relation to the interaction between the law of the contract and the law of a foreign state (e.g.
in the context of capacity, authority, illegality or force majeure).
Over the past 35 years, Ben has developed substantial litigation and subject matter expertise defending licensed professionals, entrepreneurs, and senior executives
in essentially every type of business
dispute involving securities, malpractice, trusts, and employment
issues.
«Jeff and his colleagues have an impressive record of success
in high - stakes
disputes and are exceptionally well positioned to represent clients
in a broad array of matters, including claims
involving the Private Attorneys General Act, Prop 65, food and beverage litigation, the California Environmental Quality Act, and many other
issues.»
What is clear is that parental alienation is a big
issue: CAFCASS estimates that around 80 % of the difficult
disputes about children
in court
involve a child or children who are being subjected to parental alienation.
Suppose that business gets into a serious business
dispute with another business, e.g. a joint venture gone bad with related accounting and trademark
issues involving hundreds of thousands to million of pounds
in controversy economically.
We represent clients
in a wide variety of situations where custody is at
issue, including grandparents seeking custody of a grandchild, other relatives seeking custody of a child
in their family, same sex couples seeking to establish custody of a child born during their relationship, and even cases
involving custody
disputes between a surrogate and the gestational parents.
• Counsel to Ottawa property owners
in successfully defending complex «cottage property title
dispute»
involving complex
issues of title
in both Registry and Land Titles.
We represent workers
in disputes involving discrimination, unpaid wages, Family and Medical Leave Act, and other employment law
issues, and assist them with unemployment insurance appeals.
He is an ardent litigator, serving as lead counsel
in numerous civil jury trials
involving medical - malpractice, contract
disputes, defamation and related business torts, shareholder
disputes (e.g., tortious interference with business relationship, trade secret, and non-compete violations), shareholder and LLC
disputes and their fiduciary obligations, real - estate litigation, construction litigation, and creditors rights»
issues and related bankruptcy and receivership
issues.
Our transfer pricing team has represented US and foreign - based multinational enterprises
in some of the largest, most complex, and important transfer pricing
disputes in recent history, including serving as lead counsel to Amazon.com
in its significant win
in the US Tax Court
involving a cost - sharing buy -
in and related
issues — one of the largest transfer pricing cases ever litigated and the first
involving e-commerce.
He is also regularly
involved in multi-jurisdictional
disputes,
involving complex jurisdictional
issues or concurrent foreign proceedings or where the substantive law of the English proceedings is not English law.
A recurring
issue I get
involved with is the environmental damage of equipment, and
in these cases
disputes have often arisen as a result of a lack of understanding of, or inappropriate reliance on, ingress protection ratings (IP ratings).
«The matters to which the court must have regard include --(a) the financial value of the claim and the amount
in dispute, if different; (b) whether it would be more convenient or fair for hearings (including the trial) to be held
in some other court; (c) the availability of a judge specialising
in the type of claim
in question; (d) whether the facts, legal
issues, remedies or procedures
involved are simple or complex; (e) the importance of the outcome of the claim to the public
in general».
Likewise, if the parties are required under the contract to discuss the
issues in dispute (by, for example, a series of escalating meetings concluding with a meeting of Managing Directors) before proceedings can be
issued, then there is perhaps a greater chance that the matter will be resolved without the need for the Court to be
involved.
Jack has over twenty years of experience
in numerous types of commercial litigation matters, with substantial representations of clients
in many matters
involving environmental litigation, including five trials pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, significant architectural, engineering and construction
disputes, business acquisition and transactional
disputes, including takeover / merger and acquisition litigation, claims under purchase and sales and indemnity contracts, securities law litigation, insurance coverage on behalf of the insured, and legal
issues relating to medical records release and copying.
For general contractors and subcontractors, getting sucked into a large construction
dispute simply because you were
involved in a project or assisted
in some
issue that went wrong, that doesn't mean you have liability.
Judge Ahalt has successfully mediated tens of thousands
disputes in areas including complex business transactions, construction, personal injury, medical malpractice, real estate, landlord and tenant, and contracts.He is frequently called upon by the parties and judges to mediate the most challenging judicial controversies
involving post trial and appellate
issues.
David is generally instructed
in high profile and heavyweight cases
in the High Court, frequently
involving conspiracy and economic torts, unlawful competition, team moves, the protection of confidential information, post-termination restraints, wrongful termination / expulsion, carried interest and bonus
disputes (where he has acted
in most of the landmark decisions such as Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald, Keen v Commerzbank and Anar v Dresdner Kleinwort), as well as claims arising
in a regulatory context which raise important reputational
issues, and whistleblowing and discrimination claims
in the Employment Tribunal.
Dana represents developers, contractors, material suppliers, and design professionals
in disputes involving construction defect claims, delay claims, construction lien
issues, and contract
disputes.
This can range from historical information about judges and lawyers, notably including the cases
in which they have been
involved and the decisions reached, to the different parties
in dispute, and even specialist IP
issues, such as patents.
the
issues involved are often intangible and insusceptible to quantification — rather than dealing with the cost of a collapsed deal or the speed and state of repair of a car
involved in an accident, family law
disputes often concern parenting capacity, employability, personality disorders and wellbeing;
Antigone has acted as lead trial counsel and appellate counsel
in federal civil lawsuits across the United States and she has represented numerous Fortune 500 companies
involved in high stakes intellectual property
disputes and a variety of other business and legal
issues.
DEG - Deutsche Investitions («DEG») v Koshy and Gwembe Valley Development Co v Koshy and related actions Acted for a state - owned German bank
in a long running
dispute arising out of an investment
in Zambia,
involving originally insolvency
issues and claims
in fraud and for breach of director's fiduciary duties.