Sentences with phrase «issues in your first paragraph»

Not exact matches

Rossing issues a salvo with her opening line: «The rapture is a racket,» Her first paragraph is a full - blown jeremiad: «In place of healing, the rapture proclaims escape.

SCOTTSDALE, Arizona, November 7, 2016 / PRNewswire / — In the news release, «RiceBran Technologies to Host 2016 Third Quarter Financial Results Conference Call on November 10th at 4:30 PM EST» issued on 7 Nov 2016 14:30 GMT, by RiceBran Technologies over PR Newswire, we are advised by a representative of the company that the date in the first paragraph has been changed from «Wednesday, November 10th» to «Thursday, November 10th&raquIn the news release, «RiceBran Technologies to Host 2016 Third Quarter Financial Results Conference Call on November 10th at 4:30 PM EST» issued on 7 Nov 2016 14:30 GMT, by RiceBran Technologies over PR Newswire, we are advised by a representative of the company that the date in the first paragraph has been changed from «Wednesday, November 10th» to «Thursday, November 10th&raquin the first paragraph has been changed from «Wednesday, November 10th» to «Thursday, November 10th»

«The art of running the mile,» said the first sentence of the first paragraph of the lead story of the first issue of SPORTS ILLUSTRATED, «consists in essence of reaching the threshold of unconsciousness at the instant of breasting the tape....

First paragraph: 1) reason for writing: 2) your position: 3) the issue and, if appropriate, the bill number and where the bill is in the legislative process.

Those terms as I stated in the first paragraph however are too simplistic for a modern world where libertarians are often very progressive (left) on social issues such as gay marriage but are fiscally very conservative (right).

Commissioner Martens comments are the first after a tersely worded two paragraph statement issued in late — September.

The translator receives the sentence on a Tuesday, as part of the first paragraph of a paper appearing in the following week's issue, which is published on Thursday.

--(i) Beginning 5 years after the first calendar year for which a covered entity must demonstrate compliance with section 722 (a), the Administrator shall issue no further international offset credits for project - level or program - level activities pursuant to this paragraph, except as provided in clause (ii).

The first three or four paragraphs in which he identifies all of the issues with the film is exactly where I'm at with it.

Basically, these are the chapters that precede the starting digital chapters in the first SJ Alpha issue and are accompanied by a short paragraph explaining that chapter.

A joint statement the group issued to Trump, in which the first letter of each paragraph spelled «Resist,» read, «Supremacy, discrimination, and vitriol are not American values.

--(i) Beginning 5 years after the first calendar year for which a covered entity must demonstrate compliance with section 722 (a), the Administrator shall issue no further international offset credits for project - level or program - level activities pursuant to this paragraph, except as provided in clause (ii).

(See above paragraph, combine with economic alarmism, a great sense of solidarity, an easy issue — complex and futuristic — to do it on, and a huge tea party and right wing conservative movement predicated on the idea that markets «solve» everything even though by definition they can't solve externalities — hence along with justice and national defense why we even need just limited government in the first place, and an implicit inherent belief in the right to pollute (here it's really better characterized as just radical alteration against our interests, not pollution), since common area is «fair game,» and there we go.)

Article 1, 1st Protocol Article 1 contains three rights, but the one most in issue in these cases is likely to be in the second sentence of the first paragraph: «No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.»

Adding to what I said in the first comment, in the first paragraph, a later ONCA case on the same issue shows the ONCA striving to correct itself, eventually.

«Choosing also in its Response to the instant Motion to focus on its justiciability arguments, the Bar dedicated only a few paragraphs (of its five and half page brief) to the substance of the First Amendment issues.

80 In the light of all of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is that EU law — in particular, as it results from Article 7 (1)(b), Article 8 (4) and Article 24 (1) and (2) of Directive 2004/38 — must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefiIn the light of all of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is that EU law — in particular, as it results from Article 7 (1)(b), Article 8 (4) and Article 24 (1) and (2) of Directive 2004/38 — must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefiin particular, as it results from Article 7 (1)(b), Article 8 (4) and Article 24 (1) and (2) of Directive 2004/38 — must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefiin the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefiin Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefit.

Each Contracting State shall designate by reference to their official function, the authorities who are competent to issue the certificate referred to in the first paragraph of Article 3.