Not exact matches
Shareholders
need disclosure on
issues like political spending and
climate change because there is material risk that can affect the bottom line.»
Councilmember Lander said the district
needed someone
like Sikora who would «fight for progressive values in government, try to win a more equal city, address the challenges of
climate change, make sure the rights of workers are respected, address the
issues of health care on the policy level, and fight in the neighborhoods to improve our schools and make them better.»
It's just amazing that, you know, you could capture that much information and it's interesting in the scientific perspective because what we are finding right now with
issues like climate change and conservation is that we really
need fine - grained samples from very large geographic areas to really understand the dynamics of species range movements and how fragmentation is occurring and many biogeographic questions, and literally, the only way we can do this is through voluntary networks
like this because it would cost billions and billions to send professionals out at that finer scale to understand it.
«At the end of the day, people buy their product based on value and utility for what they
need, and while they may be interested and passionate about certain
issues like energy security or
climate change, very few customers will actually let that altruistic sense drive their purchasing decision,» Stricker said.
With life - dependent
issues like climate change, biotechnology, and the availability of clean water facing us, we
need to empower our youth with problem solving skills that will help them address these problems.
In other words, it feels to me
like there's some sort of distorted feedback loop, wherein candidates don't raise environmental
issues because they think they may be controversial and divisive (though, as McCain or my dad's generation of Republicans show, the planet obviously crosses party lines), and the public doesn't raise
climate issues enough because it apparently isn't on the political menu,
like religion at dinner parties, but that doesn't mean we don't believe (in
climate change or the
need for our
change).
As it happens there's a body called the International Panel on
Climate Change that's ideally suited to the
needs of people
like yourself who are (apparently) to the
issue.
To be convincing, the arguments for
climate change need to
change from the burden of proof model to a model whereby a thesis is supported explicitly by addressing the
issue of what the case would have to look
like for the thesis to be false, in the mode of argument justification (e.g. Betz 2010).
The answer to this problem, which is a real one, since many reporters are newbies or don't know the science they are reporting on and are just looking for a few good quotes to bolster their reportagel, is this: scientists who understand the
issue of global warming and
climate change need to write more oped commentaries for major newspapers
like the NY Times and the LA Times and the Guardian, with their names attached as author, and get the truth out that way.