Sentences with phrase «issues trial tried»

Lead trial counsel in the first medical products class action / common issues trial tried to verdict in Canada (146 trial days), successfully defending one of the world's leading manufacturers of life - saving cardiac devices in a national class action claiming more than a billion dollars in damages (awarded 2013 Canadian Product Liability Impact Case of the Year by LMG Life Sciences)

Not exact matches

Sunderland boss O'Neill is expected to meet with the player and his agent this week, in a bid to try and iron the off field issues, as Sessegnon's children make the trip to the North East for a trial living period.

I've got to say that I find the timing baffling, although the Times reports today negotiations have been ongoing to try settle this issue without a trial.

Attorney Steven Cohen suggested Cuomo had his eye on the West Seneca property and even tried to connect the issue to the recent corruption trial of former aide Joe Percoco and Syracuse developer Steve Aiello.

Despite trying to get Democrats and Republicans to work out a resolution themselves, the panel issued plans in October, which the trial court tweaked.

DeFrancisco also tried to tie the issue to the ongoing federal corruption trial of Cuomo's former closest aide, Joe Percoco.

And he tried to tie the issue to the ongoing federal corruption trial of Cuomo's former closets aide, Joe Percoco.

The SPARX trial tries to rigorously address this issue.

Another possible cause is food toxins; I assume you've eliminated grains and legumes, but dairy looks as if it might be problematic for some fraction of the population, so you might try an elimination trial to see if it's an issue for you.

It doesn't try to show some drastic change, but it does attempt to convince others that change can indeed happen, it also never puts blame on one person, because obviously with marriage it is a joint effort, there will be trials and on other occasions it simply won't work, but time and commitment can change that, rarely can a simple film like this address so much in such limited issues, but sharp, often improvisational dialogue and strong performances create a very real and insightful piece that underplays everything for maximum effect, which works.

lists the eight points from the Nuremberg trial fact sheet followed by statements that represent some of the main issues that the Allied powers confronted as they tried to figure out how to achieve justice after the war.

As my car is approaching inspection I'm trying hard to fix this issue myself (if possible) because since the P0171 (running lean) code has so many possible causes, it's literally a matter of trial and error for the repair which can cost well over $ 1k at least from what I was quoted by the dealer (and also from my research on parts and labor online).

Mollie goes to live with a foster family with a therapist who is trying to help her with her upcoming trial but his own family has its issues; a fragile wife who can't control her daughter who is determined to make Mollie's life hell.

E-mail me for free sample issues or try our low - cost two month trial for every service.

How to tell if an excess of treats is the issue: Trial and error is pretty much the only way — try reducing the number of treats, sticking to lower - calorie options, or offering treats only on a set schedule.

When no underlying cause can be identified an effort is still usually made to eliminate as many of the common causes as possible, by using a wide spectrum dewormer (usually fenbendazole) to try to rule out parasites, dietary food trials to try to identify food sensitivities and allergies, biopsy of the intestines to try to rule out cancers and to aid in identifying other underlying causes and by the use of antibiotics to try to rule out the bacterial overgrowth / toxin issues.

I am a fellow dog trainer, but I'm more involved with strictly performance training (agility, obedience competitions, trialing, testing & certifications) and can not spend the time trying to help dogs with behavioral issues.

If you try Next Issue for free with a 30 - day trial and continue by paying for a membership, you'll get 500 Elevate points upon your first monthly payment, an additional 500 Elevate points upon your... Continue Reading

By all means, consider artificial salt water pondages, subject to the issues raised upthread in relation to the Japanese trial, or marvel at the (non renewable) achievements of Eraring Energy, but please don't try to hide behind unsubstantiated and wishful schemes which, if implemented, will have selected large dams in the Snowy rising and falling by enormous amounts daily.

Torts — Negligence — Medical malpractice — Causation — Trial judge finding respondent obstetrician liable for applicant infant's injuries — Whether, under principles described in Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, it is open for a trier of fact to find causation by drawing an inference based on all the evidence led at trial, notwithstanding the fact that the defence has led some evidence to the contrary — Whether, in an informed consent case, the causation issue is decided in accordance with the majority or the minority opinions of the House of Lords in Chester v Afshar, [2005] 1 A.C.Trial judge finding respondent obstetrician liable for applicant infant's injuries — Whether, under principles described in Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, it is open for a trier of fact to find causation by drawing an inference based on all the evidence led at trial, notwithstanding the fact that the defence has led some evidence to the contrary — Whether, in an informed consent case, the causation issue is decided in accordance with the majority or the minority opinions of the House of Lords in Chester v Afshar, [2005] 1 A.C.trial, notwithstanding the fact that the defence has led some evidence to the contrary — Whether, in an informed consent case, the causation issue is decided in accordance with the majority or the minority opinions of the House of Lords in Chester v Afshar, [2005] 1 A.C. 134.

With respect to the latter, if the insurer is simply not prepared to make a settlement offer, the value of mediation will lie in trying to narrow and / or resolve some of the issues, better understand the parties» respective positions, and most importantly, allow the claims examiner to make their own assessment of the plaintiff regarding presentation and credibility in order to evaluate how the plaintiff will be perceived at trial.

2 - Will you bill me more if you have to do «extra» work; i.e., researching legal issues, writing legal memoranda, arguing motions, rejecting unacceptable offers from prosecutors and judges and making additional court appearances, or even trying the case in a jury trial.

A court procedure during which the issues to be tried are narrowed and certain facts and admissions are agreed upon in order to speed up the trial.

Rob served for several years as principal outside counsel and lead trial lawyer for the Illinois Gaming Board, advising the Board on a range of regulatory issues, and as a Special Assistant Attorney General, trying major administrative matters.

In the same way that plaintiffs are permitted to try their cases at the common issue trial stage with reference to expert opinion establishing a common causal link where there is some basis in fact to do so, it appears that defendants who seek contribution and indemnity from third parties will be entitled to the same procedural courtesy without recourse to individual proof.

And don't get me started on the kindred issue of trying to get a judge to issue a ruling at all following a bench trial.

Good trial lawyers try to resolve all these issues with the trial judge in advance of trial.

«The docket will loosen up and trial lawyers will be able to try the cases that need trying on the most important issues.

We are frequently brought in shortly before trial to serve as lead trial counsel, co-trial counsel or appellate counsel to make sure that the case is properly tried and that all appellate issues are properly preserved.

She has tried dozens of cases in the Probate & Family Courts and resolved hundreds more short of trial, ranging from substantial asset divisions to contested parental rights and novel issues involving the property rights of non-married cohabitants and the rights of non-biological parents.

We have proven trial experience — having tried cases involving class actions, mass plaintiff cases, personal injury, wrongful death, products liability, medical malpractice, employment issues and consumer issues.

Looked at in aggregate terms, non-family civil proceedings are subject to an institutional squeeze — there is a constitutional imperative to try criminal cases within a reasonable time (the Askov issue) and a social imperative to move family law cases (particularly those involving children) through the system to trial with dispatch.

It remains of considerable importance to examine whether or not the case is one in which the admission of the plea of guilty of a now absent co-defendant would have an unfair effect upon the trial by closing off many, or even all, of the issues which the jury is trying.

joint trial: When two or more cases that have the same facts or issues of law are tried together.

The plaintiffs did offer five days before trial to dismiss the claim against the other defendants if the defendants agreed to concede a failure to meet the standard of care and try the causation issue alone.

National Trial Lawyers Article, January 17, 2013: American Cancer Society Issues Controversial Guideline to Try to Reduce Lung Cancer Deaths.

The Court of Appeal was careful not to conclusively weigh in on any substantive outcome — «A proper understanding of Precision's conduct is not possible until the trier of fact has made findings of fact on the relevant issues» (see para. 46) and that, with respect to the effect of the exclusion clause, a «trial judge would be in the best position to assess whether the evidence with respect to the allegations of fraud would warrant the intervention of public policy in this matter».

[12] With respect to the taped conversations, the trial judge relied on solid principles that took into account not only the sound public policy of trying to discourage the use of secretly recorded conversations in family proceedings but also his assessment of the probative value of the tapes in relation to the issues before him.

I have tried over 30 matters to decision, including over 20 jury trials, and have been counsel of record on approximately 50 published and unpublished opinions issued by the California Court of Appeal and the California Supreme Court.

So, in the circle of life that is the Toronto motions culture, an Issues List developed at the suggestion of an experienced case management judge to avoid summary judgment motions and to secure an expedited trial of a dispute on its merits, now finds itself confined to the dustbin of «judicial nice tries», with the parties turning their backs on the proffered expedited trial date and hunkering down for summary judgment motions.

The purpose of a case conference is to spot out any issues that need to be resolved in your family matter, identify what information you and your partner still need to share with each other, and try to find ways that you can solve your issues without going to trial.

Some Tennessee judges will not schedule your contested divorce for trial unless you and your spouse attend mediation first to try to settle the contested issues on your own.

Under Michigan law, the judge does not have to try custody issues all over again when and if you proceed to trial to resolve other issues of your divorce.

In Palm Beach County, your divorce case (really, any civil case) isn't going to trial unless the parties... and their lawyers if they've got them... go to mediation with a neutral third party specially trained to try to get the parties to reach agreement on all of the issues (the mediator).

That depends mostly on how much fighting takes place as the spouses try to resolve by agreement the legal issues (custody; a parenting plan; support; and division of property and debt) that the judge must decide following a trial if the parties can not agree between themselves directly or through mediation or with the assistance of and negotiations through their lawyers.

«Dr. Wilson's report, which had been ordered by the trial court, stated, in pertinent part: «This does raise the issue of parental alienation, and all of the information that I have seen in this case strongly suggests that this is what [the mother] has been trying to do - she wants her [current husband] to be the father of her children, and she therefore wants to push their father on, and she has done a good job of this with one child, and she appears to be working on the other....

My background working in the past as a therapist and clinical supervisor in children and family counseling programs, and litigating children's issues in family and dependency (abuse and neglect) cases, is helpful in trying to resolve children's issues based on what is best for the child - which is the legal standard under Florida law, and in litigating these issues when we need to go to trial.

A tiny minority of couples actually begin a trial of their cases, and a smaller minority try their cases to conclusion — at which time the Judge decides the unresolved issues in the case.

Even if parties are unable to agree or completely negotiate their high conflict divorce, courts will try to get the parties to agree on as many issues as possible to narrow the contested issues that would have to be heard in a trial or hearing.