We call
it a foolish step back to...
Not exact matches
The Six Sigma standard needs to take a
step or two back because; while it's a great goal and a significant standard to shoot for in some businesses and contexts, it's a
foolish fantasy and a false formula in the majority of cases.
I know, some people want to just «
step out on faith» and quit their job, trusting God to provide, but I believe this is more
foolish than faithful.
If we make
foolish decisions based on some improper understanding of the Sovereignty of God, He is very likely to
step back and let us experience the consequences of our
foolish decisions rather than
step in and help us out of the predicament we got ourselves into.
When I first heard about omitting the salt until AFTER the autolyse stage (the next
step) I was puzzled... it seemed a
foolish and unnecessary
step, but trust me, it's important!
He looks so
foolish and all of a sudden it seems our players have been
stepping up all along not because of any direct input from the bench.
It would be
foolish for him to take that
step to sacking him.
The very first
step you failed at, was reading the introduction, which would have prevented you from making such a ridiculously
foolish comment.
On the other hand, doing something
foolish would take you a couple of
steps back.
Noting this possible / cautious first
step towards shareholder value, it would be
foolish to discount Record's cash now — and as owner - operators, we can be confident they won't spend it foolishly & will ensure it's fully recognised in a possible takeover situation.
While failure to follow mandated data - protection guidelines is
foolish, the good news in all this is that pet retailers can take positive
steps to minimize risk.
It's
foolish to
step out of your home without insurance.