Not exact matches
Survey
items focusing
on test preparation activities were much more weakly related to student
achievement gains than
items focusing
on instructional quality.
Over the years, developers of standardized
achievement tests have learned that if they can link students» success
on a question to students» socioeconomic status (SES), then about half of the
test takers usually answer that
item correctly.
Yuan, Kun and Vi - Nhuan Le, Estimating the Percentage of Students Who Were
Tested on Cognitively Demanding
Items Through the State
Achievement Tests.
This suggests an alternative criterion by which to judge changes in student performance - namely, that
achievement gains
on test items that measure particular skills or understandings may be meaningful even if the student's overall
test score does not fully generalize to other exams.
Quantitative data included
items from the second teacher survey and student performance data
on state - level
achievement tests.
Important here is the need to remember that assessments capable of both predicting performance
on state
tests and tracking progress toward
achievement of state standards must include
items across the entire range of skills necessary for demonstrating proficiency in the standards.
We find that the estimated gaps are strongly associated with the proportions of the
test scores based
on multiple - choice and constructed - response questions
on state accountability
tests, even when controlling for gender
achievement gaps as measured by the NAEP or NWEA MAP assessments, which have the same
item format across states.
The technical explanation, in part, is that
test designers try to build questions that avoid Differential
Item Functioning (DIF)- items in which students from different groups (commonly gender or ethnicity) with the same underlying achievement levels have a different probability of giving a certain response on that particular i
Item Functioning (DIF)-
items in which students from different groups (commonly gender or ethnicity) with the same underlying
achievement levels have a different probability of giving a certain response
on that particular
itemitem.
I refer to adaptive
testing,
testing that begins with a small set of locator
items and based
on the student» s performance
on those
items assesses the student increasingly
on content at their level of
achievement.