Sentences with phrase «joint and several liability for»

If both spouses co-signed for a debt, both spouses will probably be held to joint and several liability for the debt.

Requiring as a standard of care that all persons searching a property have joint and several liability for ensuring the correctness of the address would not materially impede any legitimate police work, but would reduce the number of mistakes.

The questions raised by the present case essentially ask, first, whether the French tax on the market value of immovable property owned in France by a company established in a Member State is also applicable where the company is established in an overseas country or territory (OCT), being in the present case the British Virgin Islands, and, second, whether the joint and several liability for payment of that tax on the part of any legal person interposed between the party or parties liable to the tax and the immovable properties located in France constitutes a restriction of free movement of capital.

Leadell Pilv has successfully represented AbeStock AS, Viimsi Kaubanduskeskus OU, and ABC Vara AS before the Estonian Supreme Court in a dispute over their alleged joint and several liability for a EUR 4.6 million debt (plus interest).

The new rules will introduce mandatory data breach notification for all, joint and several liability for suppliers (data processors); tougher restrictions on the use of profiling and the collection and use of children's data; enhanced rights for individuals; and a requirement for most organisations to appoint a data protection officer.

In other words, there is joint and several liability for claims, regardless of whether the claim flows from negligence or from an excluded act (see below regarding lawyer conduct).

Where a temporary help agency supplied the services of an assignment employee to a client of the agency, Bill 146 would amend the ESA to create joint and several liability for the regular wages and overtime pay earned by the assignment employee during each pay period that the employee supplied services to the client of the agency.

A co-signing agreement creates joint and several liability for the loan.

Not exact matches

- eliminates joint and several liability provisions for «responsible persons»

It finally turned to the joint and several liability rule under the Income Tax Act, which says that upon the death of the annuitant of a RRIF, the annuitant (or the annuitant's estate) and any recipient of RRIF proceeds are «jointly and severally liable to pay a part of the annuitant's tax» on the RRIF for the year of the annuitant's death.

That puts you in the awkward position of also being responsible for their portion of the liability loss over and above what your policy is able to pay, because of that joint and several liability.

For example, some of the best business credit cards offer «commercial liability,» while other business credit cards offers offer «joint and several liability.»

Business credit card offers with joint and several liability means that both you and your business are liable for debts, so you would have personal liability.

For example, if you sign a lease with a Joint and Several Liability Clause and rent an apartment with several others, all of you are responsible for each other's share of the reFor example, if you sign a lease with a Joint and Several Liability Clause and rent an apartment with several others, all of you are responsible for each other's share of thSeveral Liability Clause and rent an apartment with several others, all of you are responsible for each other's share of thseveral others, all of you are responsible for each other's share of the refor each other's share of the rent.

More seriously, it enforces compliance with statutory «moral hazard» requirements that can operate to impose joint and several group - wide liability for pension scheme underfunding — without any question of fault or bad faith arising.

Joint and several liability makes all tortfeasors responsible for the full amount of the judgment.

If one of the new tenants doesn't pay or damages the house, is it legal for the landlord to then use joint and several liability to sue one of the original roommates?

Wisconsin Joint and Several Liability Cases — Examples in Wisconsin where a defendant, despite being minimally at fault, was responsible for paying close to all of the damages.

Joint and several liability is a rule that allows the personal injury victim to sue for and recover the full amount of damages from any one defendant.

«By making joint - and - several liability for wages or shifting costs of WSIB it certainly alters the factors under which they originally negotiated their arrangements and I suspect most temp agencies and their clients will have to sit down and say, «OK what does this now mean in terms of who has responsibility for what liability,»» says Broad.

I'm thinking this is a case where joint and several liability applies; IncumbentCo can go after any particular one of the owners and developers for the entire amount if they feel like it, and then it would be up to that person to then sue anyone else he thinks is partially liable.

Practice leader Klusmann is highly respected for advice in connection with the complicated and still relatively new topic of joint and several liability among cartel members.

Prior to 1995, Wisconsin had a pure form of joint and several liability where a defendant as little as 1 % at fault could have been responsible for all of the plaintiff's damages.

AB 75 (Budget Bill — Joint and Several Liability): Alters Wisconsin's joint and several liability law by forcing defendants as little as one percent at fault to pay for 100 percent of the damJoint and Several Liability): Alters Wisconsin's joint and several liability law by forcing defendants as little as one percent at fault to pay for 100 percent of the dSeveral Liability): Alters Wisconsin's joint and several liability law by forcing defendants as little as one percent at fault to pay for 100 percent of theLiability): Alters Wisconsin's joint and several liability law by forcing defendants as little as one percent at fault to pay for 100 percent of the damjoint and several liability law by forcing defendants as little as one percent at fault to pay for 100 percent of the dseveral liability law by forcing defendants as little as one percent at fault to pay for 100 percent of theliability law by forcing defendants as little as one percent at fault to pay for 100 percent of the damages.

If there are multiple defendants responsible for an accident, they may each be held liable for the full sum of the plaintiff's damages under a theory of «joint and several liability.»

Raises the threshold for the imposition of joint and several liability from 15 percent to greater than 50 percent.

It was not necessary for the trial judge to find that Bergman was an active participant in the internet defamation campaign from the outset in order to attract joint and several liability.

In relation to the other respondents, the tribunal proceeded on the basis that it had a discretion whether to apportion liability between the local authority and the race relations body respondents, or to make a joint and several award — in which each respondent was liable for the whole amount.

Therefore, she is not responsible for any portion of David Ireland's wages or for the portion of Thomas Hanwell and Dwight Siman's wages covering April 25 to April 30, 2012... In the end, liability is joint and several but Debra Faul's liability is reduced by 1 weeks» pay for Thomas Hanwell and Dwight Siman.»

The tribunal had held that liability on the centre and the two individuals for the discrimination element was to be joint and several (a point potentially of some relevance to the individual because the centre had become insolvent).

Prohibits application of the rule of joint and several liability in actions for punitive damages, except for wrongful death actions, actions for intentional infliction of physical injury, and class actions.

That puts you in the awkward position of also being responsible for their portion of the liability loss over and above what your policy is able to pay, because of that joint and several liability.

In legal terms, however, a married couple is jointly responsible for marital debt because of joint and several liability, which means that the spouses are liable in respect of the same liability.

Each spouse is responsible for the entire debt because married couples have joint and several liability, which means «both spouses are each entirely responsible for the return and the tax liability and its tax obligations.»