Sentences with phrase «joint and several liability where»

Clements affirms that it is joint and several liability where the negligence of each of the tortfeasors is a necessary cause of the injury.

Prior to 1995, Wisconsin had a pure form of joint and several liability where a defendant as little as 1 % at fault could have been responsible for all of the plaintiff's damages.

Not exact matches

Where a temporary help agency supplied the services of an assignment employee to a client of the agency, Bill 146 would amend the ESA to create joint and several liability for the regular wages and overtime pay earned by the assignment employee during each pay period that the employee supplied services to the client of the agency.

Wisconsin Joint and Several Liability Cases — Examples in Wisconsin where a defendant, despite being minimally at fault, was responsible for paying close to all of the damages.

One that irks me, as often as not, is the continued refusal of some judges in this province to understand that statute, common law, and principle, in cases where a defendant's liability is proportional (several, only) not solidary (i.e. joint), requires them, in order to get make the correct decision — the correct decision is important, right?

I'm thinking this is a case where joint and several liability applies; IncumbentCo can go after any particular one of the owners and developers for the entire amount if they feel like it, and then it would be up to that person to then sue anyone else he thinks is partially liable.

The questions raised by the present case essentially ask, first, whether the French tax on the market value of immovable property owned in France by a company established in a Member State is also applicable where the company is established in an overseas country or territory (OCT), being in the present case the British Virgin Islands, and, second, whether the joint and several liability for payment of that tax on the part of any legal person interposed between the party or parties liable to the tax and the immovable properties located in France constitutes a restriction of free movement of capital.

We still do not know whether the extent of liability, in cases where Resurfice material contribution does apply, is just proportional (several) or joint and several.

The lack of specification over the claim of alleged Charter violations did not specify which defendants where responsible, and claimed «joint and several liability.»