Sentences with phrase «joint custody advocates»

THE JOINT CUSTODY ADVOCATES CLAIM: Lerman, Isabel A. «Adjustment of latency age children in joint and single custody arrangements» California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego, 1989 This study evaluated 90 children, aged 7 to 12, divided equally among maternal, joint legal, and joint physical custody groups.

Don't you think it's a little odd that the same advocates of the legal defense theory of parental alienation syndrome also are joint custody advocates?

Not exact matches

Advocates of joint custody also believe that the involvement of both parents in the child's life promotes the best interests of the child.

Whether you are working harmoniously with your spouse for joint custody, or are seeking sole custody to protect your child, we will assertively advocate for a beneficial outcome for your family.

Ha - Redeye notes that «litigants» (presumably fathers» rights advocates) made this claim before the Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access, which reported in December 1998.

If Gardner's above observations are credible even in part: why haven't we heard the same folks advocating to just get rid of the misguided and harmful notion of joint custody, and the denigration of mothers» primary parenting?

So they pretend that they really care about their kids and join fathers rights groups and advocate for joint custody and lower child support payments so they can feel better about themselves.

Glenn Sacks has complained about recent responses to his and other fathers» rights advocates» comments about joint custody.

I have consistently advocated for joint legal and physical custody.

And... Why is this Advocate of Calling it «Adult - Child Sex» So Interested in Touting Joint Custody?

THE FATHERS» RIGHTS ADVOCATES SAY, under the title: Research on Shared Parenting and Joint Custody that Joint custody and shared parenting have been studied for more than a quarter - century, with the majority of studies indicating significant benefits for chCustody that Joint custody and shared parenting have been studied for more than a quarter - century, with the majority of studies indicating significant benefits for chcustody and shared parenting have been studied for more than a quarter - century, with the majority of studies indicating significant benefits for children.

From another study frequently touted by the fathers» rights advocates as supporting joint custody: «The author cautions courts... against making joint custody mandatory, naming several situations in which such a blanket decision would be deleterious.

Braver is a staunch advocate of continued father involvement in children's lives after divorce, and of joint legal custody as a tool to promote father involvement.

THE FATHERS» RIGHTS ADVOCATES POINT TO: Rockwell - Evans, Kim Evonne, «Parental and Children's Experiences and Adjustment in Maternal Versus Joint Custody Families» Doctoral dissertation, 1991.

THE FATHERS» RIGHTS ADVOCATES and the forensic parenting evaluators and who indulge them (expediently forming their opinions from secondary sources and «literature») CLAIM:... Joint legal custody has been consistently linked with more parental involvement, higher child support compliance, and less conflict between parents.

THE FATHERS» RIGHTS ADVOCATES POINT TO: Wilkinson, Ronald Richard, «A Comparison of Children's Post-divorce Adjustment in Sole and Joint Physical Custody Arrangements Matched for Types of Parental Conflict» Doctoral dissertation, 1992; Texas Woman's University.

Contrary to the posturing in the last sentence of the pro-joint custody advocates, above, children in the more optimal joint custody situations (the ones that endured) did no better than those in sole custody (a group which commenced containing the most problematic cases and also which accrued those thoroughly impossible joint custody situations that failed), and so, if all ended up «no different,» then those who remained in their joint custody situations were unnecessarily worse off than they had to have been.

Section IV discusses the incongruities between the concept of joint custody as advocated and the realities of a predominantly black community in which poverty defines the lives of a significant segment of the population.

A parent who was advocating a shared parenting or joint custody arrangement would not want to choose an assessor who had never recommended joint custody.