Sentences with phrase «joint custody arrangements made»

violates the joint custody agreement, a court may utilize the parenting plan as evidence of the specific joint custody arrangements made between the parents.

Not exact matches

One of the best ways to make a successful joint custody arrangement work is by documenting your schedule using a parenting plan.

If one parent in a joint legal custody arrangement takes decision - making powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral decisions about a child's education), the other parent can go back to court to get a judge to enforce the joint legal custody order.

Prior to making a decision about joint custody, the court will consider whether both parents agree to a joint physical custody arrangement.

Parents should try to make an agreement regarding child support in joint custody arrangements.

Such interim orders contained provisions stating that the plaintiff and the defendant shall have interim joint custody and guardianship, that the primary address of the children shall be the defendant's address, that for the purpose of access arrangements the plaintiff shall promptly inform the defendant of her monthly work schedule, and the defendant shall make efforts to ensure the children spend equal time with both the plaintiff and the defendant and, upon receipt of such work schedule, draw a calendar setting out parenting time for each parent for the coming month, and that the plaintiff shall be allowed to travel to Japan with the children from November 2, 2002 through November 18, 2002.

Joint custody is an arrangement whereby both time with the child and decision - making regarding the child is shared by both parents.

In a joint custody arrangement, both parents have the authority and must agree on major decisions relating to their child whereas in a sole custody situation, only one parent has such decision making authority.

Instead of each parent sharing the decision - making for their child in every respect as in a traditional joint custody arrangement, in a parallel parenting regime, parents assume full decision - making responsibility for different domains.

Your argument should focus on what has changed in either your or the other parent's life since the time of the original order that makes having a joint custody arrangement in the best interest of the child.

Custody laws in Iowa define joint legal custody as an arrangement where both parties share equal rights and responsibilities in the decisions to be made for theCustody laws in Iowa define joint legal custody as an arrangement where both parties share equal rights and responsibilities in the decisions to be made for thecustody as an arrangement where both parties share equal rights and responsibilities in the decisions to be made for the child.

For example, under a joint custody arrangement both parents will be able to make decisions in terms of education, religion and health care.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

In Colorado, the term «shared custody» refers to shared physical living arrangements, and the term «joint custody» refers to shared decision making.

In such a scenario, joint custody pertains only to a sharing of the decision - making responsibilities whereas physical care is determinative of the living arrangements.

Sole legal custody is an arrangement in which one parent has sole authority to make decisions about the child, even though the parents may still share joint physical custody.

While the law favored joint custody, unless the parents agreed on a different arrangement, judges could consider a number of factors that might make a joint custody arrangement unfeasible.

If parents request joint custody, Michigan judges are obligated to order it, unless some circumstance exists that would make such an arrangement harmful to the child.

In joint legal custody arrangements, a move will not affect decision - making authority; thus, both parents must still participate in making decisions about the child.

With a joint custody arrangement, parents share legal custody, which means that both parents have the right to make decisions regarding the child's upbringing.

Not all states automatically grant joint custody requests from parents, particularly if they can not get along well enough to make such an arrangement work, but courts often will do so if you can prove that the custody terms are in the best interests of your child.

Some states, such as Arizona, require periodic reviews after you're divorced to make sure your joint custody arrangement is still working out.

Ohio courts generally prefer joint legal custody arrangements, in which parents share decision - making authority but one parent provides the child's primary place of residence.

While the courts» primary guideline in making their custody arrangement is the best interests of the child, the courts» priority is determining which parent is capable of providing what is best for the child and the practicality of joint custody.

The court may order sole legal custody with shared physical custody, joint legal custody with sole physical custody or make other custody arrangements.

Joint Legal Custody - In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's welJoint Legal Custody - In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's wCustody - In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's weljoint legal custody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's wcustody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's welfare.

The exemption of such a directive is recognized in joint custody agreements and other arrangements made by the divorced parents.

There are a variety of joint custody arrangements available, but — at minimum — joint custody means parents share in decision - making regarding the child.

In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share equally in decision - making responsibility for a child but may not necessarily spend equal amounts of time with them.

Dr. Holstein estimates that shared / joint physical custody arrangements make up less than 20 % of all custody orders.

The parenting plan must identify both parents, identify the child or children subject to the plan, state whether both parents agree to the plan, identify a preference for sole custody or joint custody with respect to decision - making authority concerning various aspects of the child's life, and describe preferred visitation arrangements.

When making a decision on whether to grant joint custody, most courts look at whether such an arrangement is in the best interest of the child.

Once a court issues an order for joint legal and physical custody, both parents must make legal custody decisions together and adhere to the physical custody arrangements.

Prior to making a decision about joint custody, the court will consider whether both parents agree to a joint physical custody arrangement.

Much more common than true joint custody arrangements (where both physical and legal custody are shared) is «joint legal custody,» in which both parents share the right to make long - term decisions about the raising of a child and key aspects of the child's welfare, with physical custody awarded to one parent.

One of the best ways to make a successful joint custody arrangement work is by documenting your schedule using a parenting plan.

In a joint legal custody arrangement, parents share the responsibilities of making decisions focused on raising the child and other important decisions like education and health care.

This raises the question whether the costs associated with joint custody make such arrangements feasible for low - income families.

[FN181] Nevertheless, the alternative of no access to this type of public benefit in one of their dwellings under a joint physical custody arrangement makes the lives of children living in poverty even more tenuous.

When making changes to a joint custody arrangement, the court will consider many factors, including the child's relationship to his or her parents, siblings and stepparents.

In contemplating a proposed joint custody order, the best interests of the child standard obliges the court to ensure that the parents have assessed all components of their joint agreement, * 803 that they are committed to making it work, that their proposal fully addresses the many contingencies, and that there is no reason to believe that the child's interests will not be served by the arrangement.

In the inane insistence that «both» parents «participate» in making decisions regarding the child, in order to avoid stalemate, parenting coordination is the tool for unworkable custody and timeshare arrangements, notably joint custody, which removes from BOTH parents the right to function with authority and automony.

A court will generally agree to joint child custody arrangements when parents are able to work together to make legal custody decisions and physical custody arrangements that benefit the child.

The fact that they're in court litigating the parenting arrangement because they don't agree on joint custody makes this unlikely.