Sole custody means only one parent has rights to make decisions or physically care for the child, whereas
joint custody gives those rights to both parents.
Placement determines where the child or children will live, but
joint custody gives each of the parents equal rights in decision - making.
Not exact matches
A court will
give one parent sole
custody of a child (sole managing conservator) or both parents
joint custody (
joint managing conservatorship).
Both parties characterize the
joint custody provision of the final decree of dissolution of their marriage as untenable; they both urge that it should be changed to
give one parent the permanent
custody of the girls, subject to the right of visitation of the other parent.
Actor Jason Patric's ex-girlfriend is refusing to honour the actor's request for
joint custody of their three - year - old son because he legally
gave up...
Instead, it is based on who is the active parent, the one providing the child with daily supervision control, taking the child to piano rehearsals and doctor appointments; some parents are not as active as they work more hours, yet they have this notion that this will
give them the entitlement to
joint custody, which is not true.
ABAJournal.com: «Judge was unaware he had
given joint custody to father accused of raping the 12 - year - old mother»
A Michigan judge on Tuesday rescinded an order
giving joint custody to a father accused of raping the boy's mother when she was 12.
Many parents will share the custodial rights in a
joint custody arrangement, or by an order
giving the access parent extra rights.
Sole
custody gives one parent rights and responsibilities, while
joint custody indicates that both parents equally share duties.
Joint and sole
custody can be applied in both situations, meaning that these responsibilities can either be split between co-parents or
given to only one co-parent.
Arkansas law prefers to
give parents
joint physical
custody.
An order for
joint custody would probably be
given only where the parents and grandparent all agree.
In that example, the court may grant both parents
joint legal
custody or
give sole legal
custody to the father if there is a compelling reason to do so.
Whether the court
gives you full
custody,
joint custody, or visitation depends on the courts.
Joint legal
custody is
given to both parents.
Generally the court favors
joint legal and physical
custody but there are many situations where a court will
give sole physical to one parent and
joint legal (decisionmaking)
custody to both parents.
Nevertheless, [the mother's] claim for sole
custody will be
given serious consideration because she is a biological parent of [the boy], and [the father's] claim for
joint custody will be
given serious consideration for the same reason.
Joint legal
custody gives both parents the legal right to make decisions.
In a surprising and quite shocking turn of events, a convicted sex offender was
given joint custody of a young boy who was conceived as a result of a rape crime involving a 12 year old girl and...
Although agreements as to child
custody, support and parenting time are not enforceable even if addressed in a settlement agreement, a court
gives great weight to
joint decisions on these issues and rarely rules against them.
Instead, it is based on who is the active parent, the one providing the child with daily su - pervision control, taking the child to piano rehearsals and doctor appointments; some parents are not as active as they work more hours, yet they have this notion that this will
give them the enti - tlement to
joint custody, which is not true.
I've seen orders that
give parents «
joint custody» but
give one parent no unsupervised visitation.
Joint and sole
custody can be applied in both situations, meaning that these responsibilities can either be split between co-parents or
given to only one co-parent.
One parent may obtain full
custody, making the other person a non-custodial parent, or they may be deemed
joint custodians,
giving them equal rights and responsibilities.
Again, parents may be awarded
joint legal
custody, or one parent may be
given sole legal
custody, depending on a number of factors.
«In this instance, the report put wind in the father's sails, thinking he could get
joint custody, when it was ridiculous to consider that the mother would accept the recommendations in the report,
given her version of events.»
Joint legal
custody is usually ordered by the court to
give parents equal say regarding important decisions made on behalf of the children.
If the
custody evaluator recommends
joint custody, for example, a judge is unlikely to accept an alternative plan that
gives your ex no time with the child unless you can demonstrate incompetence or bias on the part of the evaluator.
«If the parents aren't getting along, you may not be able to
give them
joint custody because they'll argue over everything and the kids will suffer for it,» she says.
The court does not
give any preference to one parent because of gender, and no preference for either
joint or sole
custody is presumed.
That motion judge's ruling was reversed by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey (our intermediate appellate court), ruling that
giving such a presumption in favor of the custodial parent is improper in cases where the children's surname was chosen by the parties at the birth of each child and especially in cases where the parents share
joint legal
custody.
Less commonly,
joint physical
custody give both parents shared possession of the child.
The agreement is sometimes
given to parents who want to maintain
joint custody but who need legal assistance to guarantee that the child is cared for properly.
Dad relied on the principles of Beck v. Beck, 86 N.J. 480 (1981), which defined
joint legal
custody as
giving both parents equal decision - making regarding their children's care, education and welfare.
If the judge declines to award
joint custody, he must
give a reason.
As the name suggests, physical
custody tells us which parent physically has the children at any
given moment and typically is the main issue people think of when asking what is
joint custody.
In what must have been a difficult decision, the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba held that it would be in the best interests of the children to
give the mother and father
joint custody, and for them to share physical
custody of the children on a 2 -2-3 schedule.
Joint legal
custody does
give the non-custodial parent significant legal input, and Dad can have a say in his child's life.
The potential for bartering away the child's financial resources because of a bad faith request for
custody is reinforced by («friendly parent») provisions that
give a preference to the parent requesting
joint custody when the alternative of sole
custody is considered by the court.
If the court determines that
joint custody would best serve the child's needs, the court will enter an order
giving shared
custody rights to the parent and petitioning relative.
The court might be reluctant to
give joint custody to parents who are unwilling to cooperate with one another or who can not reach resolutions on major parenting issues, however.
Joint legal
custody grants both parents decision - making authority over the child, while sole legal
custody gives only one parent such authority.
Joint physical
custody, however, will only be
given to parents who are living relatively close to each other.
Joint legal
custody will
give both parents the right to make important decisions about the child's life including education, healthcare and religion.
Giving Parents «
Joint Custody» does not mean their children are allowed equal time with both of them.
In 1986, the majority of orders
gave so - called «traditional»
custody to mothers, and only 1 % of orders resulted in
joint legal
custody.
If you want a more
joint physical
custody you can
give the parent with less parenting time more time with the child.
One state is pushing for more
joint custody decisions to
give kids equal time with both parents.
Some judges are predisposed to order
joint custody unless someone
gives them a good reason not to do so.