Sentences with phrase «joint custody of children when»

When parents divorce, many prefer to arrange for joint custody of the children when possible.

Missouri law favors joint custody of children when parents separate, so that children have «frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with both parents.»

Missouri law favors joint custody of children when parents separate, so that children have «frequent, continuing...

Not exact matches

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

An Alabama court may order joint custody with or without the consent of both parents when it serves the child's best interests.

A family court's award of joint custody will determine where the child will physically live and when, and the court will also make a determination regarding how major decisions regarding his health, education, and religious needs will be made.

In Maine, when parents request joint custody, the court will agree to this arrangement unless the court decides joint custody is not in the best interests of the child.

Joint custody, he asserts, involves each parent's having joint control over the care, upbringing and education of the children, even though the children reside most of the year with one parent, while divided custody involves each * 272 parent's having the children for a part of the year with control over the children only when in his or her cusJoint custody, he asserts, involves each parent's having joint control over the care, upbringing and education of the children, even though the children reside most of the year with one parent, while divided custody involves each * 272 parent's having the children for a part of the year with control over the children only when in his or her cusjoint control over the care, upbringing and education of the children, even though the children reside most of the year with one parent, while divided custody involves each * 272 parent's having the children for a part of the year with control over the children only when in his or her custody.

Another potentially problematic situation is when a couple marries after the birth of a child, as in one New York case when the court denied a nonbiological, married but not adoptive mother's petition for joint custody.

If parents have joint physical custody of three children all at different stages of development, an iron clad schedule, of who has the children when, does not allow for the needs of the individual children.

The court primarily considers the best interests of the child when making custody decisions, and the state has gone on record that it believes joint custody is in a child's best interests.

In some states, an award of joint physical custody is possible when a child will be staying with both the mother and the father for significant periods of time.

Even when it is determined that the child needs to spend time with both parents in order to thrive, courts are increasingly reluctant to award joint physical custody because of the disruptions it causes children.

In most situations, joint physical custody will only be awarded when the parents of the child plan on living relatively close to each other.

When joint custody is awarded, support obligations are based on how much each party earns and the percentage of time the child spends with each party.

(A) when a court orders sole custody to one parent, the custodial parent, except in cases of abuse, neglect, or abandonment, should facilitate opportunities for reasonable telephonic and electronic communication between the minor child and the noncustodial parent, as appropriate, as provided for by court order if the court determines that this type of communication is in the best interest of the child; and (B) when a court orders joint custody to both parents, each parent should facilitate opportunities for reasonable telephonic and electronic communication between the minor child and the other parent, as appropriate, as provided for by court order if the court determines that this type of communication is in the best interest of the child.

The judge will weigh the following factors when determining if joint custody is in the best interest of the child:

When parents separate after the child is born, the default rule is «joint custody» of the child unless there are circumstances that demonstrate one parent or the other should have sole custody.

There are two types of legal custody: (i) «sole legal custody» refers to when only one of the parents has these rights; and (ii) «joint legal custody» is where both parents have the same rights and responsibilities for the major decisions for the child.

Thus the family court did not err when awarding sole custody of the children to the mother and specifically declining to award joint custody.

A «move - away «case arises when a parent that has joint or sole custody of the child decides to move to a location that is far enough away to disrupt the current custodial arrangement.

We'll provide a brief refresher on the meaning of the term (information you will also find in the Child Custody and Access section of our Help Centre), followed by some more detailed information on when a court may, or may not, order joint cCustody and Access section of our Help Centre), followed by some more detailed information on when a court may, or may not, order joint custodycustody.

California courts tend to prefer when parents share joint legal and physical custody of their children after a divorce.

When parents have joint custody, they have equal decision making rights, although one parent may have physical custody of the child significantly more than the other parent.

After DNA testing established paternity, on Sept. 22, 2017, Judge Gregory S. Ross, 24th Circuit Court Family Division of Sanilac County, MI awarded parenting time and joint legal custody to a convicted sex offender, Christopher Mirasolo, who forcibly raped and threatened to kill the minor child's mother 9 years ago when she was 12 years of age and Mirasolo was 19 years of age.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

«Two other studies similarly found joint physical custody to be more beneficial to children and adolescents than sole maternal custody along multiple dimensions when conflict was low, but these benefits were suppressed by high levels of conflict (Lee, 2002; Maccoby & Mnookin, 1992).»

«Joint custody mitigates the traumatic sense of loss and rejection children often feel when a parent moves out.»

Joint legal custody is when both parents share the legal rights and responsibilities that affect their child's health, education and welfare in a number of areas, including in which religious faith to raise the child.

Physical custody can either be sole or joint - sole is when one parent has the child in his or her care most of the time, and the other parent has weekend visitations and perhaps a mid-week visit.

After frequent visitation while your child is an infant, you can transition to more of a joint custody arrangement when she is old enough to divide her time more easily between your homes.

A different analysis may be required when parents share joint physical custody of the minor children under an existing order and in fact, and one parent seeks to relocate with the minor children.

The above blather about attachment theory is to pave the way in advance for an excuse when infants and children placed into joint custody arrangements as a result of the «advice» in this article start doing badly.

When joint physical custody is granted, there is no «visitation» schedule because the children live between the two homes and all responsibilities of childcare are shared.

While some fathers may take little interest in their children, the main causes include failure of the courts to award joint physical custody, failure to award significant parenting time («visitation»), failure to enforce the parenting time that has been ordered, readiness to curtail contact between fathers and children when estranged wives make any allegation, child support orders that require fathers to work two or three jobs, thus leaving no time for parenting, moveaways, and other factors.

At the court's discretion, the judge may award sole custody when it's in the best interest of the child, or joint custody when both parents request joint custody and have agreed to it and it is in the best interest of the child.

A joint custody plan agreed upon when a child is three probably won't be practical five years later, when she's in school; remarriage or relocation of an ex-spouse may also affect terms of their agreement.

Parents also reported higher satisfaction with joint custody arrangements, and parents who were ordered to pay child support were more likely to do so when they shared custody of their children.

Joint physical custody may lessen or eliminate the traumatic sense of loss and rejection children often feel when a parent moves out.

Joint physical custody is when a child lives with each parent for a significant period of time.

Like many states, Tennessee presumes joint custody, also known as shared custody or shared parenting, is in the best interests of the child when both parents agree.

Title 25, Chapter 4, Article 1, A.R.S. Section 25 - 403.02 defines the essentials of the parenting plan, which includes each parent's rights and responsibilities in terms of personal care and decision making in the areas of education, healthcare and religion; a detailed schedule of the physical residence of the child throughout the year; prescribed courses of action when changes need to be made to the agreement or if the agreement is broken by one party; and a statement from both parties acknowledging that joint custody is not defined by equal parenting time.

I am in favor of joint physical custody arrangements, but only when both parents are able to work together and have their children's best interest at heart.

Joint custody, when possible, is seen a practical and desirable since this is crucial in a continuing parent - child relationship even after divorce; however, it may be practical when the welfare of the child is jeopardized by one parent.

Although joint custody is ideal, it is only feasible when parents can share in the «care, custody and control» of their children amicably.

«A policy of automatically denying joint physical custody when a couple is labeled as «high conflict» brings additional drawbacks in addition to denying children the protective buffer of a nurturing relationship,» the lengthy statement of 110 world experts about conflict, as Brennan quoted on the article.

As the name suggests, physical custody tells us which parent physically has the children at any given moment and typically is the main issue people think of when asking what is joint custody.

When making a decision on whether to grant joint custody, most courts look at whether such an arrangement is in the best interest of the child.

Joint custody theory however, even when very young children commenced in sole mother custody, arguably resulted in far more children ending up in the sole custody of their fathers than would reasonably be expected — or reasonably would approximate that parent's share of the childcare and homemaking in «intact» two - parent homes.

When a child lives a relatively equal amount of time in each parent's home, this is referred to as shared custody, also often called joint custody.