Sentences with phrase «joint custody of their children following»

Fathers who are working on gaining sole or joint custody of their children following a divorce will find resources to help in their efforts.

Not exact matches

According to North Carolina child custody laws, if a military parent has sole or joint custody of a child and receives deployment papers that involve moving a substantial distance from the parent's home, a North Carolina family court will issue a temporary custody order of the child during the parent's absence, which shall end no later than 10 days following the parent's return.

What follows are some of the most frequently asked questions we get regarding child custody, joint custody, child visitation, and family law.

The judge will weigh the following factors when determining if joint custody is in the best interest of the child:

We'll provide a brief refresher on the meaning of the term (information you will also find in the Child Custody and Access section of our Help Centre), followed by some more detailed information on when a court may, or may not, order joint cCustody and Access section of our Help Centre), followed by some more detailed information on when a court may, or may not, order joint custodycustody.

In comparison to children in sole custody arrangements, children in joint custody arrangements who spend at least 35 percent of their time with each of their parents enjoy the following benefits:

The ideal set forth in Section 3040 (a) is that joint custody is the first choice of a judge, followed by a person in whose home a child has continually resided and lastly, to anyone else judged to be able to provide adequate care.

According to North Carolina child custody laws, if a military parent has sole or joint custody of a child and receives deployment papers that involve moving a substantial distance from the parent's home, a North Carolina family court will issue a temporary custody order of the child during the parent's absence, which shall end no later than 10 days following the parent's return.

Also of note, a 2005 study by Margaret Brinig on the effects of presumptive joint custody laws found as follows:»... [S] eparation after the custody statute took effect, holding other things constant, was statistically significantly related to a decrease in the absolute dollars of child support awards, with a difference of about $ 80 a month.

However, even this turns into a larger net loss in buying power for the custodial parent because of inflation during the same time period...» [Presumption of joint custody] legislation increased the number of motions to modify or enforce parenting time or child custody... the number did increase significantly (and almost doubled) following enactment of the statute.

A number of duplicative father's rights websites (e.g. Shared Parenting, CRC) and custody articles cite to the following items to make the claim that «the research» supports joint custody as being either innocuous or actually beneficial for children or women.

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals expressed its concern regarding joint custody of young children as follows:

The court found that joint custody would be unworkable because of the following communication related issues: 1) the father had the tendency to bully the mother, 2) the father continued to denigrate the mother in the child's presence, and 3) the parents had incompatible approaches to communication.

What follows is a legislative proposal that creates a simpler statute, and, while it includes joint custody, it emphasizes maintaining the status quo with regard to caretaking while encouraging an assessment of what best addresses the need of the child.