Sentences with phrase «joint custody requires»

Joint custody requires a great deal of contact between the parents, coupled with shared decision - making.

Since joint custody requires cooperation between parents, the court may employ the services of a parenting coordinator when parents are in disagreement.

Joint custody requires a signed joint parenting agreement.

Joint custody requires the parents discuss and cooperate on all significant issues regarding how their child is raised.

Not exact matches

As with most joint physical custody schedules, this one requires that your children have fully functional bedrooms and living space in each of your homes: Maintain separate wardrobes, toys, and favorite electronics at each place to the extent possible.

Here is the reality of my divorce: Despite the fact that the court appointed custody evaluator ruled parenting during the marriage was joint, a vocational evaluation that concluded my ex-wife could make just as much money as me, joint custody of the children post marriage (although in reality they were with me much more often), pretty good evidence my ex-wife committed fraud and perjury and absolute evidence her lawyer maliciously lied in court, I am required by the court to pay her a massive amount of alimony until he day I die.

If the parents have joint legal custody, it usually requires both parents to communicate and agree about major decisions.

Because this case plainly fails the second and third tests, it also likely fails the sixth, which requires that the children not suffer emotionally or psychologically from joint custody.

A joint child custody agreement requires, first and foremost, that both parents do their level best to create a healthy parenting atmosphere, even despite the fact that you are getting separated or divorced and you may not be able to be the live - in full - time dad you once were.

Joint custody does not necessarily require joint physical Joint custody does not necessarily require joint physical joint physical care.

In joint custody situations, the judge could order the sale of the house and require both spouses and children to relocate.

The minority of cases that allowed a decision to home - school to stand when parties had joint custody usually involved an agreement to home - school prior to the breakdown of the marriage, or access schedules that required the flexibility of a non-institutional learning environment.

Judges are required to consider possible joint custody in every case, but there's no presumption in favor of this unless both parents agree.

Unlike most states, however, New Mexico requires divorcing parents to enter into a joint custody arrangement in most cases.

Joint physical custody requires that each parent is allowed «significant periods of physical custody.»

Additionally, when joint custody is awarded in any combination, parents may still be required to pay child support.

Whether move out of state by parent with joint legal custody and primary physical custody would be sufficient to satisfy standard of proof required for modification of child custody orders depends upon facts.

Just 14 months after a 15 - day trial that granted the parties joint custody of their daughter (and required them to agree to a parenting coordinator, or in the absence of agreement, permitted Dr. Irwin Butkowsky to choose one), the father initiated a motion to change seeking sole custody.

Because both parents can created a situation of absolute deadlock where joint custody has been awarded, each situation that results in an impasse requires the intervention of the Family Courts.

We have exempted from the business associate requirement certain situations in which the law has created joint uses or custody over health information, such as when law requires another government agency to determine the eligibility for enrollment in a covered health plan.

After considering the jurisprudence with respect to the double - bind question, the Court found that the risk of it resulting in a presumptive disposition may be greater where a joint custody or shared residency arrangement requiring both parents to reside in the same locale is in the best interests of the child.

essay addresses the issue of Court Orders for joint custody that essentially become orders for de facto sole custody to the alienation - pathological parent unless the underlying psychopathology being induced in the child by the alienating parent is effectively resolved (requiring separation of the child during treatment from the source origin of the psychopathology).

Absent a joint custody agreement by the parents that includes an unequal physical custody arrangement, a judge is now required to order joint custody with an equal amount of parenting time, regardless of where the parent lives, unless one parent is ruled to be unfit.

The court may also award joint physical custody, meaning that the child lives with both parents, or joint legal custody, requiring the parents to agree on decisions for the child.

Some states, such as Arizona, require periodic reviews after you're divorced to make sure your joint custody arrangement is still working out.

A different analysis may be required when parents share joint physical custody of the minor children under an existing order and in fact, and one parent seeks to relocate with the minor children.

While some fathers may take little interest in their children, the main causes include failure of the courts to award joint physical custody, failure to award significant parenting time («visitation»), failure to enforce the parenting time that has been ordered, readiness to curtail contact between fathers and children when estranged wives make any allegation, child support orders that require fathers to work two or three jobs, thus leaving no time for parenting, moveaways, and other factors.

Most parents have joint legal custody of their children, however, that does require that the parents are able to have some communication and the ability to consult and confer with each other regarding the children.

A history of perpetrating abuse or violence often disqualifies a parent from receiving sole physical or joint custody, and might even require that visitation be supervised by a third party.

Here are factors used to decide whether joint custody is plausible or a third - party custodian is required:

For example, joint legal custody requires that parents make decisions together.

In cases where both parents have been actively involved with the child, many states require judges to consider joint custody.

Joint Custody does not effect the amount of support obligation that the non-custodial parent is required to pay or otherwise affect visitation.

Alabama child custody law, Section 30-3-150 requires that «minor children have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best interest of their children and encourage parents to share in the rights and responsibilities of rearing their children after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage [but] joint custody does not necessarily mean equal physical custody.»

Joint custody arrangements do not necessarily require parents to split time with the child equally, and there are many joint custody options available to famiJoint custody arrangements do not necessarily require parents to split time with the child equally, and there are many joint custody options available to famijoint custody options available to families.

Regardless of whether the law in your state authorizes joint custody of a pet or not, fighting to become the sole owner of your pet will require you to persuade the judge that s / he should award the pet to you.

Some provisions in joint legal custody laws require a minimum visitation period for the noncustodial parent that can be limited only when there is a threat of physical harm to the child.

When parents have joint physical custody, the court will generally require them to formulate a parenting plan.

Additionally, even when the court does not require mediation for all divorcing couples with children, the court may require parents to work with a mediator if only one party is seeking joint custody.

If you do not agree on joint child custody or all the terms of the agreement, the judge can require you to participate in court - ordered mediation.

Definition: Joint custody of a child requires both parents to cooperate in deciding major issues affecting their children, including, but not limited to, major medical decisions, religious training, and education.

If there is a joint custody arrangement, the school should require the consent of both parents for all major decisions that affect the child.

At the same time, a requirement of joint custody may be one tool the court can implement to require a custodial parent to involve, and share information with, the non-custodial (usually Dad) parent.

But in the real world of divorce, the rational, level - headed thinking that joint custody often requires doesn't always seem possible.

In joint legal custody cases, Arizona family law requires a written parenting plan that must be reviewed periodically and provides a way to resolve conflicts about custody and parenting time.

If the parents have joint legal custody, it usually requires both parents to communicate and agree about major decisions.

Some states require that both parents have a minimum amount of time with the child in order for the arrangement to be labeled joint custody.

Any parent who is seeking joint legal custody should consider specifying the areas which require mutual agreement including the following:

Further, joint custody is a more expensive proposition than sole custody, with each custodian required to maintain suitable housing for children.

Fathers in joint custody arrangements pay approximately 14 percent of their net income in contrast to sole custody fathers who are required to pay 26 percent.