Even after explosive divorce litigation in Arizona, judge - ordered outcomes of
joint legal decision - making and equal parenting time are still most common.
As equal parenting time and
joint legal decision making are almost a given (aside from certain specific activities that rebut the presumption), parents can work from that place in order to personalize and custom tailor their specific agreements to fit their schedules, and their children's needs.
Arizona courts have interpreted
joint legal decision - making and equal 50 - 50 parenting time as their default orders based on recent law and precedent.
Sally and Bob agreed to
joint legal decision - making and equal parenting time at the time of their divorce.
However, it is extremely common for a judge to award
joint legal decision making and equal parenting time.
There is
joint legal decision making.
The trial judge also reviewed the prior six months when Mother and Father shared temporary
joint legal decision - making authority.
The temporary
joint legal decision - making order situation made it clear a permanent co-parenting arrangement was not in the children's best interests.
Parents sharing joint legal custody (now referred to as
joint legal decision making) must reach agreements regarding major life decisions affecting their children.
Therefore, the court will award either sole legal decision making or
joint legal decision making in a child custody case.
The 2018 laws on child custody changed the term from custody to
joint legal decision making.
The first issue regarding how major life decision is made for the children is referred to as the form of legal decision - making and may be either sole legal decision - making, meaning one parent gets to make all of those decisions, or
joint legal decision - making, meaning the parents must agree upon those issues.
Not exact matches
Conservative critics say the
decision, which split between three Democrats and two Republicans, was imbalanced and overturned decades of
legal precedent about
joint ownership.
When parents share
joint legal custody, they both have a say in major
decisions regarding the child's life, such as education, religious upbringing, and medical care.
Because
legal decisions will be made jointly, parents who win
joint legal custody need to discuss important issues affecting their child's well - being on a regular basis.
In other words, parents who share
joint custody may only share
joint legal custody, meaning that they equally share the responsibility for making major
legal decisions on behalf of the child.
If the parents have
joint legal custody, it usually requires both parents to communicate and agree about major
decisions.
Joint legal custody allows both parents to make
legal decisions for a child such as choosing schools and doctors.
Cordell & Cordell's lawyers say some states have changed the language of their statues from «sole custody» and «
joint custody» to terminology such as «parenting time» or «
legal decision - making.»
Decisions regarding the pregnancy are a joint effort between you and your intended parents; most decisions are discussed and agreed upon before the legal agreements ar
Decisions regarding the pregnancy are a
joint effort between you and your intended parents; most
decisions are discussed and agreed upon before the legal agreements ar
decisions are discussed and agreed upon before the
legal agreements are signed.
If one parent in a
joint legal custody arrangement takes
decision - making powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral
decisions about a child's education), the other parent can go back to court to get a judge to enforce the
joint legal custody order.
If both parents have
joint legal custody, then intentionally excluding the other parent in the
decision - making process may be considered contempt of court.
Second,
joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any
decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters.
Joint legal custody is when both parents share in the responsibility and right to make
decisions for their child.
There are two types of
legal custody: (i) «sole
legal custody» refers to when only one of the parents has these rights; and (ii) «
joint legal custody» is where both parents have the same rights and responsibilities for the major
decisions for the child.
Joint Physical Custody •
Joint Legal Custody (
Decision Making) • Parenting Time • Visitation Schedules --
This agreement is known as
joint legal custody and under Oregon law, it means that parents will be sharing
decision - making responsibilities for a child.
The courts prefer to see parents reach an agreement for
joint legal custody (
decision making), cooperating in making
decisions together regarding religion, medical care, and education.
The Allen
decision did not involve a contractual
joint venture, which is not a distinct
legal entity.
Joint custody is a broad term which in
legal terms means that both parents must agree on major
decisions which affect their child.
In most cases, parents share
joint legal custody and are encouraged to confer with one another regarding parenting
decisions even after divorce.
In 1993, Father filed for a modification of that
decision and was awarded
joint legal custody and parenting time with Mother retaining primary physical custody.
Highlights include a London arbitration relating to a US $ 2 billion African urban project, a landmark
decision on
legal professional privilege in Hong Kong's highest court after a document summons by the HK Secretary for Justice, a # 1 billion
joint venture dispute between two global oil companies, and action against various defaulting clients of a renowned English financial institution.
The court must presume that
joint legal custody is in the child's best interests — that is, both parents have
decision - making authority, unless there is evidence of interspousal battery or domestic abuse.
In regards to the marriage of Roger E. Thompson (Petitioner / Appellant) and Tanya F. Thompson (Respondent / Appellee), under Arizona Revised Statute 25 - 408, a parent granted
joint custody and
legal decision making or parenting time is granted the right to a minimum of 60 days of advanced notice prior to a relocation of the minor child by the other parent «more than 100 miles within the state.»
The idea of crowdfunding for access to justice also gathered momentum in October, with the Howard League for Penal Reform and Prisoners Advice Service crowdfunding for their challenge to the
legal aid cuts for prison law and the
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants also using CrowdJustice to raise funds to challenge the government's
decision to increase asylum and immigration tribunal fees by up to 500 %.
Sole
legal custody means that only one parent has the authority to make important
decisions for the child, while
joint legal custody means that both parents have to make all or most
decisions about the child together.
With
joint legal custody, both parents make
decisions about their child's medical care, religious affiliation or schooling.
When
joint legal custody is awarded, both parents have equal rights in the
decision making process.
Joint legal custody is a
legal term that means major
decisions concerning education, medical care, and religious upbringing are made jointly by the parents.
The parties made a conscious
decision to put the property in
joint names, but did not take any
legal advice.
Legal decision making power can be sole or joint, with one parent having sole responsibility for making legal decisions, or with parents sharing this responsibility equ
Legal decision making power can be sole or
joint, with one parent having sole responsibility for making
legal decisions, or with parents sharing this responsibility equ
legal decisions, or with parents sharing this responsibility equally.
Joint custody can mean either joint legal custody, where the parents share decision making power, or joint physical custody, where the child divides his or her time between each parent's home, or
Joint custody can mean either
joint legal custody, where the parents share decision making power, or joint physical custody, where the child divides his or her time between each parent's home, or
joint legal custody, where the parents share
decision making power, or
joint physical custody, where the child divides his or her time between each parent's home, or
joint physical custody, where the child divides his or her time between each parent's home, or both.
Joint legal custody gives both parents the
legal right to make
decisions.
Joint custody can either be physical (the children physically live with each parent for a portion of the time),
legal (children live with one parent but both parents are equally responsible for making major parenting
decisions), or a combination of both.
If the court orders
joint legal custody, both parents will also have the right to make
decisions about the child's school, religious upbringing, and extracurricular activities.
The court may order
joint custody — both parents share custody — or sole custody to one parent, and must decide
joint or sole custody as to both
legal custody (the right to make
decisions about a child's welfare) and physical custody (the right to have a child live with you).
Joint Legal Custody: In a situation of joint legal custody, both parents have a say in decisions that impact the c
Joint Legal Custody: In a situation of joint legal custody, both parents have a say in decisions that impact the c
Legal Custody: In a situation of
joint legal custody, both parents have a say in decisions that impact the c
joint legal custody, both parents have a say in decisions that impact the c
legal custody, both parents have a say in
decisions that impact the child.
In particular, the FCA reasoned that because the outcome of the environmental assessment and regulatory review (the report of the
Joint Review Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the new legislative scheme, «no
decisions about
legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no application for judicial review lay from the report.
Courts often order that the parents share
legal custody of their toddler, called
joint legal custody, meaning that both parents have the
legal ability to make these important
decisions.