Sentences with phrase «joint parenting arrangement»

In most child custody cases, there is really no good reason that a joint parenting arrangement can't continue.

Not exact matches

Shared parenting refers to a joint custody arrangement where both parents share approximately equal parenting time.

Children who are the subject of a custody dispute or a joint custody arrangement may not obtain a United States passport without the consent of both parents.

A court in Delaware prefers a joint custody arrangement where both parents have equal access to the child.

Idaho courts begin custody proceedings with an evaluation as to whether a joint custody arrangement is workable based in part on an estimation of parents» abilities to work together.

A Nebraska court will place a child in a joint or shared custody arrangement if both parents agree to the arrangement.

A Joint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangeJoint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangejoint custody arrangement.

However, often parents do not have the best communication with each other after a separation and communication sometimes gets worse with a joint custody arrangement.

Joint child custody is often a «forced» arrangement, meaning that the courts believe that children benefit the most from spending a substantial and continuous amount of time with both parents.

If parents agree to joint custody and ask for it, the arrangement will almost certainly be granted, but if the judge finds that this isn't in the best interests of the child for some reason, he can decline the request and order a different custody arrangement.

In a joint custody arrangement, parents often have to bear the cost of managing two households and the accompanying expenses related to raising children.

Full custody differs from joint custody in that a full custody arrangement grants legal and physical custody to one parent as opposed to both parents.

In a joint custody arrangement, the children reside with both parents.

Parents interested in a joint legal custody arrangement should first consider the level of communication between themselves and the child's other parent.

Parents who are interested in winning joint physical custody should be clear about what kind of joint physical custody arrangement is requested.

Poor communication between parents can damage the joint custody arrangement and damage the child psychologically.

In a joint custody arrangement, parents share custody of their child, as opposed to sole custody, where one parent has full custody.

In Maine, when parents request joint custody, the court will agree to this arrangement unless the court decides joint custody is not in the best interests of the child.

A court in Oklahoma will either adopt the proposed joint custody arrangement detailed in the parenting plan or modify or reject the proposed joint custody arrangement.

Therefore, in a joint custody arrangement, it is important to present a unified front with children as it will not be good for a child to believe he / she can use one parent against the other.

In a joint custody arrangement, parents can generally manage to avoid spending much time together, if they prefer.

Although, it's a great idea to develop a parenting plan to determine where the child is expected to reside on certain days in a joint custody arrangement, it's equally important to be flexible.

While the courts in Iowa do lean toward joint custody or an arrangement that allows generous visitation, there are situations where the court will award sole custody to one parent.

One of the best ways to make a successful joint custody arrangement work is by documenting your schedule using a parenting plan.

violates the joint custody agreement, a court may utilize the parenting plan as evidence of the specific joint custody arrangements made between the parents.

The West Virginia courts prefer a joint custody arrangement which allows the child access to both parents.

A South Dakota court may order or ask the parents to agree on how the following issues will be handled in a joint custody arrangement: where the child will reside and when, where he will attend school, his medical and dental care, and other responsibilities serving his best interests.

In addition, when parents live a bit farther apart, it can be common to have a joint physical arrangement where the child will stay primarily with one parent, but split weekends and holidays between the two.

Overview of joint custody, a relatively common arrangement for divorced or unmarried parents in which the child splits his or her time between the two parents» living quarters.

If one parent in a joint legal custody arrangement takes decision - making powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral decisions about a child's education), the other parent can go back to court to get a judge to enforce the joint legal custody order.

Most custody arrangements are «joint custody,» which generally refers to a shared legal custody even if only one parent has physical custody.

In true «joint custody» arrangements, parents share equal «legal custody» and «physical custody» rights.

In the past, true «joint physical custody» arrangements were more common, in which the child lived with each parent roughly half the time.

Joint custody may be awarded when both parents agree to such an arrangement.

Prior to making a decision about joint custody, the court will consider whether both parents agree to a joint physical custody arrangement.

Parents should try to make an agreement regarding child support in joint custody arrangements.

As a result, many parents wonder about joint custody, child support and how the arrangement will impact the child support amount.

There are several reasons why a parent should continue to provide child support in joint custody arrangements.

For joint custody arrangements, the CRA conducts a detailed review to determine which parent is eligible for benefits.

Our custody and parenting arrangement lawyers led by Lorne N. MacLean, QC, have noticed how custody and parenting arrangements have progressed over time moving from the one primary parent theory in the 1970's to joint custody in the 1980's and 1990's but not necessarily equal time to the now more common 50/50 shared parenting time regimes.

Traditionally, when a joint custody arrangement is ordered, children are the ones who get shuffled back and forth between their parents» homes.

Many parents will share the custodial rights in a joint custody arrangement, or by an order giving the access parent extra rights.

Unlike most states, however, New Mexico requires divorcing parents to enter into a joint custody arrangement in most cases.

Such interim orders contained provisions stating that the plaintiff and the defendant shall have interim joint custody and guardianship, that the primary address of the children shall be the defendant's address, that for the purpose of access arrangements the plaintiff shall promptly inform the defendant of her monthly work schedule, and the defendant shall make efforts to ensure the children spend equal time with both the plaintiff and the defendant and, upon receipt of such work schedule, draw a calendar setting out parenting time for each parent for the coming month, and that the plaintiff shall be allowed to travel to Japan with the children from November 2, 2002 through November 18, 2002.

A «move - away «case arises when a parent that has joint or sole custody of the child decides to move to a location that is far enough away to disrupt the current custodial arrangement.

While parents who have a shared parenting arrangement will also generally have joint custody, the reverse is not always true: joint custody is often ordered in the absence of shared parenting.

Joint custody is an arrangement whereby both time with the child and decision - making regarding the child is shared by both parents.

In a joint custody arrangement, both parents have the authority and must agree on major decisions relating to their child whereas in a sole custody situation, only one parent has such decision making authority.

Instead of each parent sharing the decision - making for their child in every respect as in a traditional joint custody arrangement, in a parallel parenting regime, parents assume full decision - making responsibility for different domains.

Particularly in a joint custody or shared residency arrangement that has been found to be in the child's best interests, the reasons for one parent to want to move, effectively ending what has already been found to be in the child's best interests, would be very relevant to determining whether the child's needs can be met in this proposed new arrangement.