Sentences with phrase «joint physical custody as»

Generally, they describe joint physical custody as meaning that each parent shall have significant periods of physical custody and that physical custody shall be shared in such a manner to ensure that a child has frequent and continuing contact with both parents.

Recent research does not support the idea that conflict - including high legal conflict - should rule out joint physical custody as the arrangement that best serves children's interests.

Unfortunately, sometimes parents battle for control of their child and use joint physical custody as a way to «get their fair share» of the kids or (and I quote) «to make sure they live a normal life at least half the time!»

However, most states define joint physical custody as any parenting time arrangement where both parents have significant overnights with the child.

Not exact matches

As with most joint physical custody schedules, this one requires that your children have fully functional bedrooms and living space in each of your homes: Maintain separate wardrobes, toys, and favorite electronics at each place to the extent possible.

However, for parents who share joint physical custody, it's generally more common for them to also share joint legal custody, as well.

«Joint physical custody», often referred to as shared parenting means parents share equal legal custody but not necessarily equal physical custody of the child (ren).

Full custody differs from joint custody in that a full custody arrangement grants legal and physical custody to one parent as opposed to both parents.

«Joint physical custody», often referred to as shared parenting means both parents share equal legal custody but not necessarily equal physical custody of the child (ren).

This is still considered joint physical custody because the parent who has the children on the weekend is spending pretty much equal time with them as the parent who has them from after school on Monday until beginning of school on Friday since the weekend parent is with them all day Saturday and Sunday, as well as rest of the day Friday.

This meant that, while not necessarily splitting their children's time equally — that arrangement, known as «joint physical custody,» is both more cumbersome and less common — they continued to fully share parental rights and responsibilities.

Marcia and Gordon Clark, who had been married for 13 years, have joint custody of their children, with Marcia as «primary physical caregiver.»

For couples that share joint physical custody, it is pretty common for them to share joint legal custody as well.

Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters.

The court will make an order for joint custody to both parents or sole custody to one parent after reviewing factors such as the wishes of the parents and child, the parents» ability to cooperate and parent together, the child's physical, developmental, and emotional needs, and the child's relationship with each parent.

Nelson contended that the court should apply the Thompson court's language that a parent granted joint custody or parenting time has the right to move up to 100 miles from the parent's physical location with the child as of the date of the court order entitling both parents custody or parenting time.

Custody of the six children Jolie and husband Brad Pitt share is expected to be the largest part of the divorce proceedings, as Jolie has filed for sole physical custody, with visitation rights for Pitt, while asking the two maintain joint legal cCustody of the six children Jolie and husband Brad Pitt share is expected to be the largest part of the divorce proceedings, as Jolie has filed for sole physical custody, with visitation rights for Pitt, while asking the two maintain joint legal ccustody, with visitation rights for Pitt, while asking the two maintain joint legal custodycustody.

Although move out of state by parent with joint legal custody and primary physical custody is not per se substantial change of circumstances such as to make that parent's continuing custody unreasonable, this does not mean that circumstances inherent in such move are always insufficient as a matter of law to warrant modifying child custody.

If the parent proposing the move or removal has sole legal or joint legal custody of the child and the child resides with that parent for the greater period of time or the parents have substantially equal periods of physical placement with the child, as an alternative to the petition, motion or order to show cause under par.

In some cases, parents share joint legal custody, but one parent is designated as having primary physical custody of the child, with the other parent having a set parenting time to spend with the child.

The court may order joint custody — both parents share custody — or sole custody to one parent, and must decide joint or sole custody as to both legal custody (the right to make decisions about a child's welfare) and physical custody (the right to have a child live with you).

Joint physical custody means the child will spend an equal amount of time (or as close to 50/50 as possible) living with each parent.

With shared or joint physical custody, both parents provide a home for and meet the basic necessities of the child, such as clothing, food, transportation, child care and extracurricular activities.

Joint physical custody is a shared physical custody arrangement of the children, where the intention is that the children spend significant periods of time with each parent, such as alternating weeks between mother and father.

If, however, the child splits his or her time living with both parents, this will be referred to as joint physical custody.

In the past, this was referred to as «joint physical custody.»

Like other states, South Carolina recognizes both legal and physical custody, and South Carolina courts can award either type as sole custody or joint custody.

In some states, such as Missouri, if your spouse has any visitation or parenting time, you have joint physical custody.

This article will examine recent decisions concerning the relocation of the custodial parent in sole or primary physical custody arrangements as well as the proposed relocation of a parent in cases involving a joint custodial arrangement, including both joint legal custody and joint physical custody.

New York courts often award legal custody to both parents, known as joint custody, and physical custody to one parent with the other granted visitation rights.

A parent with sole physical and legal custody is known as a «sole conservator,» and when parents have joint custody, they are called «joint conservators.»

And joint legal custody, or shared custody, with one parent remaining as the primary physical custodian does little to alter the amount of time a child spends with the noncustodial parent, and does a lot to create control conflicts between parents who continue to harbor resentment stemming from the failure of the marriage.

[FN29] In type 2 cases (female - initiated violence), fathers should be encouraged to pursue primary custody of their children; [FN30] in type 3 cases (male - controlled interactive violence), both parents are poor role models, but «the parent who can better provide a violence - free environment should be considered as the potential primary caretaker for the child,» [FN31] while in type 4 cases (separation and postdivorce violence), «a range of custody plans, including joint physical custody, are appropriate.»

In some states, such as Virginia, the term, «joint custody» refers to both physical and legal custody.

Shared custody (which is also known as «joint custody» in other states) grants one or both parents shared legal or physical custody in a way that allows the child frequent and continued contact with both parents.

These cases hinge on whether the parties actually share physical custody of the child; a joint legal custody arrangement with one party acting as the primary physical custodian is not generally sufficient to invoke this higher standard of review.

For the purposes of clarifying some of this confusion, let's take a moment to go over the differences between joint legal and joint physical custody, as well as some of the many ways choosing a joint physical custody arrangement can help both you and your children.

Many jurisdictions refer to the concept as joint physical custody.

This is known as joint physical, 50/50 or shared custody.

The most common form of joint legal custody designates one parent as having primary residential (i.e., physical) custody.

So as you can see the question of what is joint custody centers itself on two things: the physical custody and the legal custody of the minor children.

If you and your spouse are able to negotiate an agreement that calls for joint physical custody, then you and your spouse may create your own plan for a joint parenting schedule as long as it serves the best interest of your child or children.

The court considers all types of custody such as joint legal, joint physical, sole custody, and third - party custody.

In joint physical custody situations, the child usually spends marginally more time with one parent, referred to as the «primary custodial parent.»

«A policy of automatically denying joint physical custody when a couple is labeled as «high conflict» brings additional drawbacks in addition to denying children the protective buffer of a nurturing relationship,» the lengthy statement of 110 world experts about conflict, as Brennan quoted on the article.

As the name suggests, physical custody tells us which parent physically has the children at any given moment and typically is the main issue people think of when asking what is joint custody.

«Joint physical custody», often referred to as shared parenting means parents share equal legal custody but not necessarily equal physical custody of the child (ren).

In Montana, the court classifies custody into different types, such as legal custody, physical custody, sole, or joint custody.

«Joint custody», often referred to as shared parenting means parents share equal legal custody but not necessarily equal physical custody of the child (ren).

If a Connecticut family court does not order joint custody, it may order alternative custody arrangements, such as awarding sole physical custody to one parent with appropriate visitation for the child with the non-custodial parent.