Sentences with phrase «joint physical custody do»

Parents with joint physical custody do not generally have significantly less conflict or more cooperative relationships than parents with sole physical custody.

Joint physical custody doesn't necessarily mean that the child spends exactly half the time with each parent.

Joint physical custody does not necessarily mean that both parents get equal time.

Joint physical custody does not mean that both parents have equal time with the child.

Not exact matches

Primarily, the two concepts are different because sole custody includes legal and physical custody, while joint custody does not.

For example, do you need a clear joint legal custody definition so you can understand how it differs from joint physical custody?

When the legal resolution to these battles is joint physical custody the battles often don't end in the courtroom.

If parents have joint physical custody of three children all at different stages of development, an iron clad schedule, of who has the children when, does not allow for the needs of the individual children.

Joint custody does not necessarily require joint physical Joint custody does not necessarily require joint physical joint physical care.

Joint physical custody is another option if you and your ex don't live too far apart.

Although move out of state by parent with joint legal custody and primary physical custody is not per se substantial change of circumstances such as to make that parent's continuing custody unreasonable, this does not mean that circumstances inherent in such move are always insufficient as a matter of law to warrant modifying child custody.

Parents may have joint legal custody even if they don't have joint physical custody.

Joint legal custody does not mean that the parents have joint physical custody; it only means that both parents share the right to make decisions affecting the child's education, health, and welJoint legal custody does not mean that the parents have joint physical custody; it only means that both parents share the right to make decisions affecting the child's education, health, and weljoint physical custody; it only means that both parents share the right to make decisions affecting the child's education, health, and welfare.

Unlike most states, Massachusetts does not presume that joint physical or legal custody is in the best interest of the child.

And joint legal custody, or shared custody, with one parent remaining as the primary physical custodian does little to alter the amount of time a child spends with the noncustodial parent, and does a lot to create control conflicts between parents who continue to harbor resentment stemming from the failure of the marriage.

Joint legal custody to both parents does not preclude sole physical custody to one parent.

[ANONYMOUS LISTSERVE COMMENT]: «The recommendation involved a joint physical custody arrangement with an odd contingency... if the mother didn't agree with the recommendation, then the father would automatically get primary residential custody... this was after the evaluator had outlined numerous reasons why the mother had serious concerns about the father having primary custody... it appeared that the evaluator had set up the mother to agree to a plan that she had clearly not agreed to during the entire evaluation...» (Florida doctorate - level MHP, January 14, 2007).

If the court order does not outline any type of shared physical or joint legal custody, the court may not intend to award any form of custody to the other parent.

Angeline Jolie's filing of sole physical custody with visitation rights versus joint custody suggests that the Hollywood mom doesn't want her children to be with their father for very long hours.

Even so, every New York custody order addresses the concepts of joint, sole, legal and physical custody, even if the order does not discuss the custody in exactly those terms.

Joint legal custody does not preclude sole physical custody to one parent.

However, New York courts will sometimes order a situation that amounts to «joint physical custody,» even if they don't use those terms to describe it.

The real question you both have to ask yourselves is does joint custody make sense in the physical sense?

Alabama child custody law, Section 30-3-150 requires that «minor children have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best interest of their children and encourage parents to share in the rights and responsibilities of rearing their children after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage [but] joint custody does not necessarily mean equal physical custody.»

When parents have joint physical custody — that is, when they share in the caregiving responsibilities for their child — this does not necessarily mean that time is split 50/50 between both parents.

If a Connecticut family court does not order joint custody, it may order alternative custody arrangements, such as awarding sole physical custody to one parent with appropriate visitation for the child with the non-custodial parent.

Joint physical custody has to do with the day - to - day care of the child and allocates at least 35 % of custodial time to both co-parents.

Legal custody has statutory liabilities to be aware of even if a parent with joint legal custody does not share physical custody.

(And they did not find that joint physical custody was better for children than sole custody.)

Code 3083, 3084, 3085 (West 1994)(stating that a grant of joint legal custody does not necessitate an award of joint physical custody); Colo..

Some teenagers who live with joint physical custody arrangements have been doing so since they were young.

Significantly, it does not take into account another side effect of joint custody: the hardship faced by the parent who shoulders the bulk of the financial responsibility by virtue of de facto sole physical custody, with little contribution from the parent who fails to meet the obligations ordered by the court.

Arkansas courts do not favor joint physical custody and judges will not order it unless parents specifically ask for it and can present a compelling case for how they'll make it work.

The findings for joint legal custody samples indicate that children do not actually need to be in joint physical custody to show better adjustment, but it is important to note that joint legal custody children typically spent a substantial amount of time with the father as well.

Recent research does not support the idea that conflict - including high legal conflict - should rule out joint physical custody as the arrangement that best serves children's interests.

Shared custody in New Jersey does not refer to a joint physical parenting plan in which the children divide their time between their parents» homes.

This is particularly true since the presumption in favor of joint custody may preclude sufficient analysis of the impact of psychological abuse, or may preclude sufficient analysis of physical abuse if the abused parent is hesitant to raise the history of abuse or is effectively silenced in the attempt to do so.

Arkansas law does not assume that joint parenting post-divorce is always in the best interests of a child, and courts lean toward one parent having physical custody and the other having visitation.