Sentences with phrase «joint submissions on»

Joint Submissions on Sanction: The Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies the Amount of Deference that Should be Given

[2] Joint submissions on sentence — that is, when Crown and defence counsel agree to recommend a particular sentence to the judge, in exchange for the accused entering a plea of guilty — are a subset of resolution discussions.

Joint submissions on sentence are not sacrosanct and trial judges can depart from them.

[2] Joint submissions on sentence — that is, when Crown and defence counsel agree to recommend a particular sentence to the judge, in exchange... [more]

The entry, which was a joint submission on behalf of client Freeborn & Peters LLP, features a series of videos that highlight the firm's new branding and positioning statements through the personal stories of the firm's... Read More

The entry, which was a joint submission on behalf of client Freeborn & Peters LLP, features a series of videos that highlight the firm's new branding and positioning statements through the personal stories of the firm's management, staff and clients.

approach the joint submission on an «as - is» basis, i.e. the public interest test applies whether the judge is considering varying the proposed sentence or adding something the parties have not mentioned, for example, a probation order

The matter was further appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada (hereinafter SCC) to clarify the test to be used by a sentencing judge in departing from a joint submission on sentence.

Or if a prosecution was in the SFO's opinion necessary this could be confined to a limited part of the suspected criminality and there would be potential for a joint submission on sentence to the court.

In relation to the SFO and the defendant making a joint submission on sentence Thomas LJ also roundly rejected the assertion that it was lawful for a prosecutor to do this; «the imposition of sentence is a matter for the judiciary».

Not exact matches

The Joint Committee chaired by both Hon. Aminu Sani Jaji of Committee on National Security and Intelligence and Hon. Oluwole Oke of the Committee on Public Procurement had recently called for submission of written memoranda / position papers from top government officials and 241 firms.

Many journals even allow «joint submissions», meaning that they ask authors whether they want to make their papers available on an archive server at the same time.

I would point out that I am not just a casual sceptic, but take the time to attend anti carbon tax protests, have a submission on record with the joint select committee reviewing the carbon tax and read and comment on a number of sceptic blogs.

This document is a joint submission to the UNFCCC on Excom of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage.

This document is the joint submission to the UNFCCC on activities for the Nairobi Work Programme.

Both submissions are based on IETA's ongoing joint research with the Harvard Project on Climate Agreements and the development of our Straw Proposal for market provisions in the 2015 Agreement (released during the NYC Summit and available here).

This flyer provides a preview of the forthcoming analysis of submissions by Parties under the UNFCCC decision on the Koronivia joint work on agriculture.

I cited Dr Abdussamatov's Astrometria report and graphs in my submission to the Joint Select Committee on the Clean Energy Future bill back in 2011, and I am glad more skeptics and now western media are seeing this guy on their radar screens.

Joint Submission by the Center for Carbon Removal, Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, Forest Trends, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, The Nature Conservancy, Rainforest Alliance, Wildlife Conservation Society, and the Woods Hole Research Center, regarding views on APA Item 6: Matters relating to the global stocktake referred to in Article 14 of the Paris Agreement: (a) identification of the sources of input for the global stocktake; and (b) development of the modalities of the global stocktake, in particular the role of the land sector and its potential for enhanced action, including Intact Forest Landscapes

British Columbia will be presenting oral final arguments to the Joint Review Panel when hearings recommence in Terrace on 17 June, based on BC's final written submission.

«While we are concerned that the existing sexual harassment penalty jurisprudence is not coherent, we do not think it appropriate to attempt to bring better order to that jurisprudence in a case proceeding on joint submissions and without the benefit of adversarial submissions.

Meerai Cho pleaded guilty in Ontario provincial court Wednesday to one count of criminal breach of trust and was sentenced on a joint submission with the Crown, according to her lawyer, William Trudell.

She is further involved on behalf of the Ontario Bar Association in legislative submissions to the Ministry of the Attorney General on proposed changes to the law of joint and several liability in the province of Ontario.

For further information on why the excessive demand regime is problematic, please read the joint HALCO / Legal Network submission to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (November 15, 2017): www.halco.org/2018/news/medical-inadmissibility-of-immigrants-halco-and-legal-network-make-submissions-to-support-repeal.

We act on behalf of parties involved as joint experts, determinaters, or as advisors in assisting with submissions.

Increased NTRB funding has been recommended in the reports and reviews of Commonwealth agencies, 170 Commonwealth Parliamentary committees, 171 State Governments172 and industry.173 Most submissions to the current inquiry of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Account into NTRBs, also recommend increasing funding to NTRBs.174 The issue of NTRB under - funding was comprehensively covered in the Native Title Report 2001175 and Native Title Report 2003,176 as well as in the submission of my predecessor to the current Parliamentary NTRB inquiry.177

These comments were made in the course of Dr. Pritchard's submission to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund: Parliament of Australia, Inquiry into the Consistency of the Native title Amendment Act 1998 with Australia's International Obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination (CERD), Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra 2000 (Herein the Joint Parliamentary Committee CERD Inquiry) Dr. Pritchard's comments were discussed in the Non-government Members Report at p117.

(23) This is reflected also in the Attorney General's submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title Inquiry into the CERD decision in February 2000, which stated:

It did this through submissions to all the inquiries conducted by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund, through a number of important reviews of aspects of the native title process, including a review commissioned by ATSIC into Native Title Representative Bodies32 and a review of PBC funding.33 It also commissioned an important paper in relation to water rights, of which native title was an important part.34 It is not clear whether the policy development role that ATSIC exercised in relation to native title issues has been transferred into the new arrangements and if so, how it is to be developed by the government.

Submissions to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund, Inquiry into Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs) in 2001, highlighted a number of problems.

[25] The appellant's third submission is that a joint custody order was not appropriate because the parties were continually in conflict over how best to raise Jacob and could neither co-operate nor communicate with each other on his upbringing.

[1] Mineral Council of Australia, Submission to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Native Title Representative Bodies, July 2004.

[Dr. Richard A. Warshak's submission to the Joint Interim Committee on Family Law for State of Missouri.

Note: In its submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title the Attorney - General's Department stated that it is for «the Parliament to decide whether substantive equality was to be provided and, if it was, what that encompassed»: Quoted in Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title, CERD and the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, op.cit, p9.

In relation to native title, I have previously rejected the arguments put forward by the government to the Committee: see Native title report 1999, Chapter 2 and my submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title, which is an appendix to the Native title report 2000.

Third, in my submission to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Native Title inquiry into CERD and the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, I argue that the government's arguments about a margin of appreciation misunderstand the scope of the Committee's interpretation of the meaning of racial discrimination.

In its submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title inquiry into CERD and the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, the Attorney - General's Department elaborated the government's position as follows:

Attorney - General's Department, Submission to the Inquiry Into Indigenous Land Use Agreements by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund, Number 38, p33.

Appendix 2: Submission of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner to the Inquiry into Indigenous Land Use Agreements by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, Submission 10 (a) to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title inquiry into CERD and the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, p8.

Part of this chapter is based on my Submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund, Inquiry Into Indigenous Land Use Agreements (PJC Inquiry), August 2001.

Appendix 2: Submission of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner to the Inquiry into Indigenous Land Use Agreements by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander...

This point is discussed at length in chapter 2 of my Native title report 1999 and my submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title inquiry into CERD.

I expressed concern about the use of connection reports in my submission to the Inquiry into Indigenous Land Use Agreements by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund.

In its submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund [35] inquiry into CERD and the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, the federal Attorney - General's Department elaborated further on the meaning of non-discrimination under the Convention:

Kimberley Land Council, Submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund - Section 206d inquiry into the operation of the Native Title Act 1993, 8 March 1999, (Herein Kimberley Land Council Submission to section 206d inquiry) pp 5 - 6.

It is encouraging to note government support for this principle as evidenced by the Commonwealth Attorney - General's submission to the Inquiry into ILUAs conducted by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund:

Submission of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund, see Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, Native Title Report 2000, Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission, Sydney, 2001, p187 - 188 (footnotes omitted).

NTRBs are funded by the Commonwealth in the following way: base funding for each NTRB53; additional funding and assistance provided to some NTRBs through a reserve fund; a strategic priority claims resolution program; and a capacity - building program.54 The Commonwealth Parliamentary Joint Statutory Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund is currently conducting an inquiry into NTRB capacity, with particular reference to NTRB funding.55 I provided a written submission to the committee and made a number of recommendations including: 56

Attorney - General's Department, Submission No. 24, Part I, p17; quoted in Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Sixteenth report of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Native Title and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund - CERD and the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2000, p8.