Sentences with phrase «joules going»

Not exact matches

(1) Merona Anorak Jacket, Target, $ 40 (2) Wellesbourne Umbrella, Jack Wills, $ 39.50 (3) Rain Rain Go Away Umbrella, Felix Rey, $ 75 (4) Romilly Rain Ballet Flats, Hunter, $ 75 (5) Monogrammed Rain Jacket, Marley Lilly + Eddie Bauer, $ 60 (6) Duckie Rain Flats, Anthropologie, $ 68 (7) Evedon Premium Wellies, Joules, $ 120 (8) Stow & Go Rain Coat, Vineyard Vines, $ 155 (9) Romilly Rain Ballet Flats, Hunter, $ 75 (10) Medium Le Pliage Tote, Longchamp, $ 210

This may account for why temperature anomalies have also gone up from those around 0.30 to 0.60 due to joule heating.

Certainly it's possible to get more benefit per joule through smarter use of energy, but using energy efficiency to «decouple» economic growth from energy consumption can only go so far.

paper that seems to have had such an effect on Joules Verne, some numbers might be useful: h = kb * T / (m * g) = 9.08 km for N2 at 300K λ = 68nm at 101325 Pa To get λ ~ 0.01 h where the deviation from the Fourier Law is ~ 10 % requires a reduction of pressure of 11 orders of magnitude to ~ 1E - 6Pa or an increase of g of a similar magnitude or some combination of both that increases λ and reduces h. I'm not going to touch the temperature gradient as that's even worse.

Well then, by all means go patent your perpetual motion machine of the second kind or explain heat flow in the second diagram, Joules.

Now go and look at the amount of energy coming from the sun to earth per second the answer is 120000000000000000 joules per second or 120,000 TW.

What I will be able to do (at least with high Reynolds, e.g a fully developped turbulence) is to develop a statistical description (so many eddies of that size and that much Joules dissipated per kg) of where the energy is and where it goes.

The energy going into the oceans (~ 5x1022 Joules per decade over the last 50 years) is a measure of that imbalance and energy accumulation.

If they are correct the water should evaporate quickly, even boil, for that 70 ºF wall is giving off 5.67e - 8 * (273K +20 K) ^ 4 or 418 Watts per square meter that is going to focus down to 400 W x 5,000 multiplication factor or 2,000,000 Watts per square centimeter and we only need 2250 Joules to vaporize that gram of water.

9000000 km ^ 2 Arctic sea ice melt spring — summer 1.8 e +13 m ^ 3 at a 2m average thickness — this is generous — see http://psc.apl.washington.edu/ArcticSeaiceVolume/IceVolume.php 917 kg / m ^ 3 for ice 1.6506 e +16 kg / year 5.513004 e +21 joules 0.143 percent going into ice melt spring — summer; BUT, a roughly equal amount comes back out during the refreeze in the fall — winter; and since it's floating, it doesn't effect sea level.