Contribute to a socially networked weather Almanac for communities to collectively
journal climate observations, questions and decisions against near - real time climate information
Not exact matches
In some cases, reviewers and / or editors supportive of mainstream views totally block important papers from being published; McKitrick, McIntyre and Herman had to completely rewrite their recent paper — showing that high tropical tropospheric temperature trends for the last three decades produced by
climate models are inconsistent with
observations — as a study of applying statistical methods developed in econometrics, and submit it to a
journal with a more open - minded editor, in order to get it published at all.
A lower and more constrained estimate of
climate sensitivity using updated observations and detailed radiative forcing time series, In review in Journal of C
climate sensitivity using updated
observations and detailed radiative forcing time series, In review in
Journal of
ClimateClimate.
See Stowasser & Hamilton, Relationship between Shortwave Cloud Radiative Forcing and Local Meteorological Variables Compared in
Observations and Several Global
Climate Models,
Journal of
Climate 2006; Lauer et al., The Impact of Global Warming on Marine Boundary Layer Clouds over the Eastern Pacific — A Regional Model Study,
Journal of
Climate 2010.
They then made the
observation that sceptical
climate scientists got fewer papers into the
journals, and were cited less.
But the NASA researchers said their approach, described in the
journal Nature
Climate Change, is the first to test the idea using satellite
observations, as well as direct temperature measurements of the upper ocean.
While walking in the snow today it struck me that it is exactly forty years since the British chemist and inventor James Lovelock published a paper in the
journal Nature that built on this
observation laid a foundation of our current understanding of
climate change.
In fact, there has been no clear large - scale surface warming for more than 16 years now, and a new paper published earlier this month in the prestigious
journal Nature
Climate Change affirms the climate models inability to correctly simulate these observ
Climate Change affirms the
climate models inability to correctly simulate these observ
climate models inability to correctly simulate these
observations.
Researchers from the Alfred Wegener Institute's Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, the University of Bremen, Germany, and the University of Cardiff in the UK, report in Nature
journal that they have made
climate simulations that agree with
observations of historical
climate change that date back 800,000 years.
Karl, T.R., C.N. Williams, Jr., P.J. Young, and W.M. Wendland, 1986: A model to estimate the time of
observation bias associated with monthly mean maximum, minimum, and mean temperature for the United States,
Journal of
Climate and Applied Meteorology, 25, 145 - 160.
The multidisciplinary aspect of the paper made it difficult to chose the
journal for this work, that covers paleo -
climate, modern
observations and
climate modelling.
Variability of Tropical Cyclone Track Density in the North Atlantic:
Observations and High - Resolution Simulations (
Journal of
Climate)