Not exact matches
In peer - reviewed
journals, reviewers usually
decide what gets published — but
editors may
decide whether to even send a paper out for review.
As an
editor at the
journal Physical Review Letters, my job is to consult experts in the field and ultimately
decide which manuscripts to publish.
Next month,
journal editors will
decide whether to retract the paper.
There are two common reasons for editorial rejection:
Editors have
decided the work does not fit the
journal's purview, or the experimental approach was judged inappropriate or unconvincing.
And when it came time to apply for a job she
decided to pursue a career as a
journal editor.
As for peer review, it means only that reasonably qualified scientists examined the manuscript and recommended changes to improve the paper, or recommended that the paper be rejected; the
journal editor has to make a determination about the merits of the paper based largely, but not entirely on the reviewers» comments (the
editor has some discretion in
deciding to accept or reject — his / her reputation as an
editor, and the reputation of the
journal, depend on sound editorial judgments).
Unless we
decide to submit the piece to a regular
journal, with all the complications of delay, possibly quixotic
editors and reviewers that is the best we can do, and I think it would be fine to call it a peer review,» Happer wrote in an email to undercover reporters.
After all the shenanigans at GRL with the replacement of the
editor and the resubmission of letters, the
journal decided once again to reject Wahl and Amman's attempt to rebut McIntyre's work.
After seeing the critique, Climate Research
editor - in - chief Hans von Storch
decided he had to make changes in the
journal's editorial process.
«After reviewing our last week of comments, we have
decided to become more assertive with our comment moderating,» ABA
Journal Assistant Managing
Editor Molly McDonough wrote in a post to the magazine's Web site Monday.