Sentences with phrase «journal editors know»

Most journal editors know how much effort it takes to persuade busy researchers to review a paper.

Funeral services took place in February for James Podgers, 67, a retired ABA Journal editor known for his deep knowledge of the American Bar Association and its inner workings.

Not exact matches

The speakers include most of the major players in ongoing debates about law and religion in public life, many of them well known to the readers of this journal: Sam Rabinove, Dean Keliey, John M. Swomley, Michael McConnell, Robert Michaelson, William Bentley Ball, Edward Gaffney, Jeffrey Hadden, Robert Destro, Mary Ann Glendon, Sandra Day O'Connor, and your editor.

550 pages, $ 35 The Editor - in - Chief of this journal tells me that he knows a Catholic editor who claims that all his friends are conservatives, his close friends are right - wingers, and his best friends aEditor - in - Chief of this journal tells me that he knows a Catholic editor who claims that all his friends are conservatives, his close friends are right - wingers, and his best friends aeditor who claims that all his friends are conservatives, his close friends are right - wingers, and his best friends are....

Recently, the editor of a leading journal of opinion quipped that his magazine would soon be known as the Newsletter of the Tocqueville Marching and Chowder Society, so often was the French sage's name now appearing in his pages.

As editor of the monthly journal Islamic Literature, and a contributor to other Islamic publications in Pakistan, he has become widely known as one of the leaders in Muslim thought in his country.

An editor of a Protestant journal of opinion recently stated that one of the current tasks facing a Protestant religious journalist is to tell American Protestants that America is no longer a Protestant country.

Does the editor's book inevitably pull the magazine into his corner and make of it a party journal no longer representative of the whole?

Canadian psychiatrist and child advocate Dr. Elliott Barker is the founder / director of the Canadian Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (CSPCC) and editor of the quarterly journal Empathic Parenting (no longer in publication).

Troy should know of what he speaks: he's been around the online political world since the halcyon days of PoliticsNow (ah, the mid-90s...) before jumping over to National Journal, where he served as Editor at NationalJournal.com and as Managing Director for Electronic Publishing at the parent Atlantic Media Company.

MAY YOU INHERIT ALL THEIR SANE READERS To the editor, The New York Journal News believes knowing where guns are is in the public's interest.

I have advocated before that one way to mitigate problems with null - hypothesis significance testing is for editors of scientific journals to employ «results blind» decision making in determining whether to publish and make it be known that they are doing so.

The decision about whether or not to accept the paper is made by one of the editors and I let the authors know if their paper will appear in our journal.

I now know that full - time journal editors do not need to have a degree in «editing.»

«This truly remarkable research is worth watching,» said Gerald Weissmann, M.D., Editor - in - Chief of The FASEB Journal, «because it may help usher in an era in which age - related macular degeneration is either eliminated or no longer considered a serious disease.»

I would like to know how to prepare specifically for a career as a scientific journal editor.

Bero had previously served on the editorial board for the British Medical Journal and was well known by the editor of Tobacco Control.

«We've known for a long time that DHA tames inflammation, now, we learn exactly how DHA works: via new substances called maresins,» said Gerald Weissmann, M.D., Editor - in - Chief of The FASEB Journal.

«These endogenous compounds have long been known in the metabolism field but here one is being used exogeneously,» said Thoru Pederson, Ph.D., Editor - in - Chief of The FASEB Journal.

Relevant to authorship are several issues: the initiation of the project («my idea»), innovative contributions («let's do it this way»), time in the lab («I did all of the work»), time spent writing («I wrote most of the article»), the tedium of the work, connections with the publisher («I know the journal editor»), seniority in the department, and specific needs, such as those in this case.

Only then does the peer review begin, and in this case the reviewers selected by the journal's editors will be publicly known.

Donald Kennedy, editor of the prestigious journal Science, knew he was in for a row if he published the paper.

Blessed be the editors of scientific journals who knew that no article is comprehensible, so they asked their writers to provide, à la Spaceballs, «the short, short version.»

But cases of commercial influence continue to surface, often making headlines, prompting some editors, like Drummond Rennie, an editor at The Journal of the American Medical Association, to sound defeated: «You know, if people lie to us, all we can do is reveal that lies were told afterwards — and usually they're lying on their way to the bank.»

Microbiologist Elies Bik is well - known for applying a close eye to studies, and has spent years anonymously submitting reports on plagiarism and image duplication to journal editors.

Editors and reviewers of top - tier journals know this, and they want more.

As the editor - in - chief of the American Journal of Cardiology noted 25 years ago, no matter how much fat and cholesterol carnivores eat, they do not develop atherosclerosis.

As editors of this journal were involved as authors, readers should know that in all such cases the affected editors recuse themselves from the peer - review process.

Danielle Bylund has previously worked in marketing and graphic design and has been an editor for multiple nationally known literary journals (and some lesser known).

First, the terminology — line editing, copy editing, proofreading — seems to mean something slightly different to every author, editor, publisher, magazine, agent, and online journal, and this makes it tough for the author seeking an editor to know exactly what it is they're asking for.

It was first known as «Editor's Picks» and served the purpose of highlighting select work from print journals on WebdelSol.Com.

Dr. Christina Chambreau is an internationally known holistic veterinarian, author, speaker and editor of the Integrative Veterinary Care Journal.

/ / WRITING / / 2018 The Artist's Book as Third Mind, The Journal of Artist's Books, JAB43, Spring 2018, Essay by Marianne Dages, originally presented at the 2018 College Book Art Association Conference 2015 - 2017, Editor for the Napoleon Gallery Essay Series 2017 Reflect / Collect: An essay on the one's we know (w / Napoleon Gallery) 2016 Three Poems, Bowietry, The Found Poetry Review, Spring On Language and Scale, an essay for the exhibition catalog of Sarah Hulsey's Iterations, Walter Feldman Gallery, Boston, Ma 2015 Marianne Dages: The Form Review, The St. Claire, w / Daniel Oliva

If the action editors can not identify suitable reviewers for themselves, then either they are (currently) too inexperienced to be editors (as they evidently don't know the broader research field well enough) or the paper is outside the scope of the journal.

This really represents a serious abuse of the scientific process, and the journal's editors should know better.

It is well - known within publishing that editors at journals often hold off publishing papers until they know they can get a nice media hit.

No, Journal Editors are not supposed to read blogs.

I'm sure you know very well that peer review is by definition gatekeeping; in this case it's closing the gate against pieces of junk * scholarship * like that from McKitrick or the example that the hacked emails were talking about, the execrable Soon & Baliunas paper whose publication resulted in half a dozen editors resigning from the journal in protest.

- Go off into fervent belief in pseudoscience - Are sure they know more than top - notch scientists who spend their lives doing this, although they themselves do not - Pontificate in OpEds, letters to editors, white papers, websites, E&E... but not peer - reviewed science journals - but have reasonable technical backgrounds - and so should be able to study and learn the science - and ought to know better - and isn't one of those scientists at end of career going off the rails into a field outside their own - and in this case, a reference to Stanford EE degree

Now I don't know how often a paper would be published without the awareness of an editor - in - chief, particularly in a relatively new and not terribly well - established journal, but I suppose it is possible.

And Wakefield's paper, which has since been retracted by the Lancet and called a deliberate fraud by the editors of the British Medical Journal — you know, he — instead of saying oh, I'm sorry, you know, I was wrong, he ended up portraying himself as a martyr to this conspiracy between big pharma, the media and corrupt public health officials.

I don't really see any meta issues on this one (O'Donnell got a tough review, AMS journals are known for that, the editor was somewhat lax in making the authors jump through hoops based on comments by a reviewer with a conflict of interest, but the paper got published).

Then they find a little - known, not particularly influential journal where an editor sympathetic to their viewpoint hangs his hat.

And in a non-climate journal, the editor has to depend on suggested reviewers by the author (eg, his friends) and doesn't know where to find a real expert reviewer.

It is well known that there have been some glitches in the peer review: a paper by Soon and Baliunas (2003) caused the resignation of several editors from the journal Climate Research (Kinne 2003), and Wagner (Wagner et al. 2011) resigned from the editorship of Remote Sensing over the publication of a paper by Spencer and Braswell (2010).

Editors for these journals may not know of suitable reviewers and may assign reviewers who are not peers within the same scientific field and who do not have the background knowledge needed to carry out a proper review.

If no one is willing to review certain papers, and then editors will refuse to publish them, they then have to go to other journals, who then get criticized for being «gray literature»... Just think of all the layers of stigmatism being paid to thought before it even becomes known!

When submitting a paper to PNAS have you prefaced your cover letter to the editor with remarks to the effect that you know the journal is a «scam» but you're hoping to avoid being besmirched?

You know this is Trenberth's stomping ground so I can't believe he has not seen them, but maybe he's too busy calling other scientists names and intimidating journal editors.

A journal like Science sees the editor rejecting papers that he doesn't like or sending them to reviewers that he knows will trash them.