Developed by Thomson Reuters,
journal impact factor measures a journal's purported importance by gauging how frequently other journals cite the papers that it publishes.
Not exact matches
Earlier this year, a group of concerned scientists and
journal publishers signed an open letter known as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) to encourage review boards and tenure committees to «eliminate the use of journal - based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contrib
journal publishers signed an open letter known as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) to encourage review boards and tenure committees to «eliminate the use of
journal - based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contrib
journal - based metrics, such as
Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contrib
Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to
measure a scientist's research contributions.
«Our
impact factor, a common
measure of a
journal's success, has increased,» he says.
► In this week's Science editorial, Editor - in - Chief Marcia McNutt calls for moving beyond publications, citations,
journal impact factors, «and derivatives of these such as the h - index» in efforts to
measure the merit of research.
It's apples and oranges, but to the extent that a comparison can be made, the influence of
journal impact factor seems stronger than that of either the number of citations your most cited article has received or of h - index, which is meant to
measure a scientist's productivity and
impact.
Citations also play a role in determining a
journal's place in the scholarly pecking order, with
journals that publish more highly cited papers earning a higher «
impact factor» (although many critics challenge that
measure).
The
journal impact factor has long been the main standard for
measuring scientific
impact, although it is deeply -LSB-...]
Among multidisciplinary science
journals, it has the third - highest
impact factor, a
measure of its influence, after the
journals Nature and Science, according to the 2013
Journal Citation Reports.
The
impact factor is a
measure of the average number of citations per article, so the higher the number, the more «important» the
journal is to the scientific community in that field.
At the same time, the
journal in many fields grew into the primary
measure of reputation, as
journal ranking could be carefully calculated by
Impact Factor (average number of times an article is cited within a two - year period), in way not possible with books (for which there was no citation index).