Not exact matches
In an interesting paper that appeared in the
journal Global Environmental Change, a group
of scholars, including Naomi Oreskes, a historian
of science at Harvard, and Michael Oppenheimer, a geoscientist at Princeton, note that so - called climate skeptics frequently accuse climate scientists
of «
alarmism» and «overreacting to evidence
of human impacts on the climate system.»
Considering that a lot
of Climategate has to do with the muzzling
of scientists that hold views contrary to
alarmism, you might think the honorific - conscious senator would be concerned about the exclusion
of their research from professional
journals.
Professor Armstrong, who co-founded the peer - reviewed
Journal of Forecasting in 1982 and the International
Journal of Forecasting in 1985, made the claim in a presentation about what he considers to be «
alarmism» from forecasters over man - made climate change.
That is exactly why those associated with false
alarmism — world leaders, Al Gore, the UN's IPCC, the US NAS, UK Royal Society, federal science agencies, and formerly respected research
journals like Nature, Science, PNAS, and Proceedings
of the Royal Society — are now held in such contempt by so many.