Sentences with phrase «journal review editors»
We send review copies to journal review editors and members of the media.
http://www.ohioswallow.com/ Not exact matches
Pushing back against «political correctness,» in 1987, Thiel co-founded the Stanford Review, a journal of conservative and libertarian viewpoints, and was its first editor - in - chief.
The teacher: Steven Heller writes the Visuals column for the New York Times Book Review and is the editor of the AIGA Journal of Graphic Design.
With year's end drawing near the editors of the Wall Street Journal «s weekend review section asked fifty «friends» to tell us their favorite books of 2012.
Allen G. Weakland, the former editor of The New American Review: A Journal of Civility and the Arts, is co-author of The Private Albert Einstein.
I also wish to thank the editors of Judaism, The Journal of Bible and Religion, The Review of Religion, The Journal of Religion, and The Review of Metaphysics for permission to use materials from articles published in those journals.
The decisions of journal editors, committees reviewing applications for grants, and administrators making appointments, all serve as informal ways of planning.
As editor of the American Ecclesiastical Review during its mid-century heyday, he guided one of the more influential theological journal in English.
Professor Baxt published widely and was the founder and general editor of the Australian Business Law Review and the Company and Securities Law Journal.
She has been a review editor for the Maternal and Child Health Journal, a peer reviewed journal, sincJournal, a peer reviewed journal, sincjournal, since 2002.
The process for review itself is so intense that if it was biased, it would be rejected before it even reached the journal editors.
She has authored or co-authored over 70 peer reviewed articles, and chapters in both national and international books on assessment and treatment of young children, and is currently an Associate editor of the Infant Mental Health Journal.
She served as editor - in - chief of «Nexus Journal of Literature and Art» and as an assistant fiction editor at the prestigious «Antioch Review.»
Program Ph.D. (Clinical Psychology), University of Pittsburgh, 1986 Editor in Chief, Journal of Anxiety Disorders Member, Board of Directors, Council of University Directors of Clinical Psychology (CUDCP) Member, NIMH Institutional Review Group, Children and Families Intervention Group
She serves on the Board of Directors of the Selective Mutism Association and is Associate Editor of the peer - reviewed journal Evidence - Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
Mohammad I. Aslam is a Ph.D candidate in Political Science at the Department of Middle - East & Mediterranean Studies, King's College London, and a former Editor at the Montreal Review Journal.
She is the Managing Editor of the St. Antony's International Review (STAIR), Oxford University's journal of international affairs.
He is the Editor - in - Chief of the peer - reviewed journal Contemporary Security Policy.
10.30 am Science and Technology Subject: Clinical trials Witness (es): Professor Sir Michael Rawlins, Chair of Medical Sciences Regulation and Governance Review, Dr Keith Bragman, President, The Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Dr Fiona Godlee, Editor in chief, British Medical Journal Location: The Thatcher Room, Portcullis House
His subsequent publishing career has included positions as founding editor of the international monthly review journal, Trends in Ecology & Evolution from 1986 until 1999.
Shortly after I reached this new state of self - awareness, I took a position as acting managing editor with an online, peer - reviewed scientific journal called Conservation Ecology.
The editors in some journals rank the reviews themselves by the quality of their scholarship.
Wager's team compared editor - chosen and author - suggested reviews submitted to 40 of BioMed Central's journals.
Mann says his complaint was that the peer - review process had been distorted to allow «extremely poor papers» to be published and points out that the journal's editor - in - chief and half the editorial board had resigned in protest.
Most journal editors know how much effort it takes to persuade busy researchers to review a paper.
That is why the editor of The Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry was puzzled by the reviews for manuscripts by one author — Hyung - In Moon, a medicinal - plant researcher then at Dongguk University in Gyeongju, South Korea.
In at least one case, the authors of a retracted article claim they didn't use an agency and did not propose fake reviewers — which suggests the journal's editors invited the fake review instead.
Moreover, if editors and reviewers for peer - reviewed journals notice similarities between a submitted manuscript and work already posted on arXiv, they can point the authors to the preprint and ask them to discuss and cite it.
In peer - reviewed journals, reviewers usually decide what gets published — but editors may decide whether to even send a paper out for review.
The effort did not go to waste: the publication describing the achievement was distinguished by the editors of the journal Physical Review Letters.
The event initiated a dialogue on the topic in the community of peer - reviewed journal editors and led to guidelines on dealing with ghostwritten articles that are now embraced by many — though not all — scientific journals.
The work appeared in the journal Physical Review Letters and has been chosen to be an Editors» suggestion for its particular importance, innovation and broad appeal.
1 In this article, current and former editors of bioscience journals comment on the editorial review process, describe how editors and reviewers are chosen, and offer concrete suggestions on how to get involved in editorial review.
DeWitt was the acting editor for a section of the July 1957 issue of Reviews of Modern Physics containing proceedings from a physics conference that he and I had organized in January of that year (he was not the regular editor of the journal).
For the stances he has taken, Duesberg has faced such ferocious personal and professional attacks that in 1996 Richard Horton, editor of the British medical journal The Lancet and himself a critic of Duesberg, broke ranks and wrote in The New York Review of Books: «Duesberg deserves to be heard, and the ideological assassination that he has undergone will remain an embarrassing testament to the reactionary tendencies of modern science.
Carol Barnes, professor of psychology and neurology at the University of Arizona in Tucson, is a reviewing editor at the Journal of Neuroscience, a 3 - year appointment for which she receives no compensation.
As ScienceInsider reported on Thursday, the journal's editor, Graham Parker, retracted the paper on 21 July after it was discovered that several paragraphs in the introduction had been copied, without attribution, from a 2007 review article.
As an editor at the journal Physical Review Letters, my job is to consult experts in the field and ultimately decide which manuscripts to publish.
Allison Lang is managing editor for Immunology, one of the monthly peer - reviewed journals of the British Society for Immunology.
Editors at the second journal may use the information gathered during evaluation at Science Robotics to expedite review, including reuse of the reviews, provided reviewers agree.
Dr. Bot is the editor - in - chief of International Reviews of Immunology and the section editor for immunology and immunotherapy for the Journal of Translational Medicine.
«Academic journal editors have a very important role in the peer review process.
* Editor's note: The author worked at BioMed Central from September 2012 until June 2014, but had no involvement with patient peer review or the new journal.
At Conservation Biology, which switched to double - blind reviews in 2014, reviewers who make a guess get it right about half of the time, says the journal's editor, Mark Burgman of Imperial College London.
In many cases, editors at these journals did not even send out the articles for peer review.
Only then does the peer review begin, and in this case the reviewers selected by the journal's editors will be publicly known.
«This review presents one of the most detailed treatises to date of organic versus conventional milk composition,» commented Matt Lucy, PhD, Professor of Animal Science, University of Missouri, and Editor - in - Chief of the Journal of Dairy Science ®.
The journal will also feature editor - commissioned Reviews.
The editor - in - chief of the European Journal of Chemistry, Hakan Arslan, a professor of chemistry at Mersin University in Turkey, does not see this as a failure of peer review but rather a breakdown in trust.
A breakthrough into the full characterisation of quantum states has been published today as a Editors» Suggestion in the journal Physical Review Letters.