Sentences with phrase «judge accepted part»

The trial judge accepted part of Pistorius» story, and he was given a fiveyear jail sentence based on the judge's ruling that he acted recklessly, but didn't mean to kill.

Not exact matches

Please accept the fact thath no matter what your religion, fearing, judging or hating other religions makes you part of the problem.

Another wrote, «The cold, hard fact remains that if you don't accept all of the Bible, then you are the ultimate judge of which parts you do accept.

Listen there are some facts people wont accept but its true.Listen i have said it here and i stand by my comments Ospina is not part of arsenal's futute he wont last long term because he is not good enough at the most important thing shot stopping.He is ok but will never be world class at that.What people do nt know is that Szcz and Ospina have already developed.Szcz shot stopping is up there with the best keepers but mistakes and some stupid exposing has not allowed him to grab the first choice.I do nt judge a player by one match i make sure i watch and analyze them.I cant see Ospina being arsenal number one for 5 years.He does not have what it takes.As Roma should have made Szcz deal permanent after all he is useless ai nt he?

The Access Bank (GH) East Cant cheque number 890081 and the Attorney General's receipt which were exhibited to the Attorney General's affidavit sworn by the Attorney General herself on 9th November 2016 as Exhibits «AG 7» and «AG7A» are attached herewith in PDF for the public to judge how any Attorney General, worth the name, can accept a cheque drawn on the Economic and Organized Crime Office which was not party to the action as part payment of the refund ordered by the Court on 29th July 2014 for the Republic.

Certain steps that were taken in the action led the trial judge to conclude that defence counsel had a proper basis for alleging negligence on the part of the third party and the trial judge accepted that the third party, or her counsel, had employed tactics amounting to an attempt to make an end run around the defendant.

Cecil's study provides four categories of summary judgment outcomes: grant in full, grant in part, deny, and «other,» meaning that no action was taken or the district judge accepted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation without indicating whether the motion was granted or denied.

However, at trial, the appellant provided an «insufficient factual underpinning» to ground compensation for loss of earning capacity; the Court of Appeal found this part of the claim failed because the judge found the appellant did not meet the burden described in the Perren decision — the trial judge simply did not accept the appellant's evidence of his limitations and anecdotal evidence from other witnesses did not shore up his testimony.

On appeal, King J did not accept that the judge had treated the case as a «sharing» case, as opposed to a «needs» case and confirmed that the district judge had regarded the husband's bonus as part of the maintenance award: «What the district judge was saying... was that historically the standard of living of this family... was dependant on H's bonus... Had the proportions been different, (more income less bonus), he would have made the basic maintenance award higher.

Related: Texting, talking while driving killed 16,000: Study But the judge accepted Kazemi's evidence that she did not intend to use the phone, based in part on her cell phone records which revealed no calls at the relevant time.

Viewing jury instructions this way I think would mean that it is part of the role of the jury to determine which parts of the jury instructions should be considered fact, and I think it would also mean that jury nullification wouldn't necessarily mean that a jury returns «a verdict of «Not Guilty» despite its belief that the defendant is guilty of the violation charged»; it could just mean that the jury doesn't accept all of the statements in the jury instructions, such as the judge's interpretation of the law, as fact.

If you can't accept that your case, or any part of it, is too strong to fail then at least accept that sometimes (just sometimes) the judge or jury «gets it wrong».

The Supreme Court of Canada rejected Khawaja's argument, which had initially been accepted in part by the trial judge, finding that the violent nature of the conduct in question disqualified it for protection under Section 2 of the Charter:

GoToTrafficSchool.com is not officially approved in the State of Colorado to offer online traffic school courses; however, some courts and judges may accept and approve our online traffic school course as part of a plea deal.

If the custody evaluator recommends joint custody, for example, a judge is unlikely to accept an alternative plan that gives your ex no time with the child unless you can demonstrate incompetence or bias on the part of the evaluator.