Sentences with phrase «judge agrees this time»

If the judge agrees this time, Wynn would be free to sell his shares if gaming regulators decide the misconduct allegations make him ineligible to be the company's largest shareholder.

Not exact matches

Well, the last time Americans had a president who was psychologically «programmed» to ignore facts that didn't agree with his beliefs, the USA ended up wasting $ 1T in an illegal war to «liberate» 100's of billions of barrels of Iraqi oil (as many as 1.2 M people died in the process due to violence, disease & starvation resulting from the conflict), nearly $ 5T was added to the U.S. federal debt, a man with experience as the Judges and Stewards Commissioner for the International Arabian Horse Association was put in charge of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. subprime credit «bubble» expanded hugely & then imploded, wiping out some $ 14T in global wealth & destroying millions of jobs, etc..

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

Arsene Wenger has been speaking to Bein Sports about the constant speculation about whether he is going to be replaced as Arsenal manager in the near future, and he thinks he is being targeted because of his age and length of time but he also agrees that he will judged on the results, which admittedly haven't been too good this season.

I disagree with u ryan the playwrs we got from southampton hve been so inconsistant and u then you say origi ings etc were bought at a steal and will be worth more in time to come so u agree with fsg policy buy potential and once they become better players sell them for a profit sorry but thats my opinion we need to hold on to the better players than compliment them with other great players fsg have turned liverpool into a selling club to fill there bck pockets this was never the liverpool way and now because of this fsg policy is the reason were mid table klopp needs to be given the funds he needs to change things only then can we judge him i just hope he is given the chance before he decides to walk YNWA

gra mar i agree assists are odd to judge a lot of our goals lately have been screamers really nothing to do with the player laying the ball off he just happened to make the last pass.A lot of times it's the pass prior to the assist pass that makes the goal.

Harding was forced to agree with the inquiry that the Times legal team had misinformed the barrister acting on their behalf in the interim injunction case and said he wrote to Mr Justice Eady, the presiding judge, to apologise for the fact he was misled.

U.S. District Judge Joan Azrack agreed to the delay because Venditto's attorneys said they needed more time to prepare to fight additional charges of securities fraud filed against him last month in a superseding indictment.

Although Percoco is still facing federal bribery charges, Judge Valerie Caproni agreed to dismiss a charge against Percoco of using his power to extort the Syracuse developers for the bribes, because he wasn't technically a state official at the time.

Silver, who was sentenced in May to 12 years in prison, along with a fine and forfeiture of more than $ 6 million, was initially ordered to start his jail time in July, but Judge Valerie Caproni agreed to push the date to Aug. 31, to wait for the McDonnell ruling, allowing that it could affect Silver's appeal efforts.

While Caproni agreed to the new lawyer, the judge rejected a plea from Feldberg for a delay of the trial, calling a bid to bar a retrial that was rejected by the Supreme Court last week a «Hail Mary» and saying Silver had plenty of time to plan for his new trial.

We finished our drinks and agreed to move on to a restaurant and this time Accidental took control, he asked how I felt about Japanese food (judging by his curious penchant for Japanese whisky, he clearly felt very good about it!)

U.S. District Judge William L. Hungate granted the one - week recess last Wednesday after D. Bruce LaPierre, a Washington University law professor who was appointed «special master,» informed him that parties to the lawsuit had agreed to an out - of - court settlement in principle but needed more time to work out its details.

I am not sure if an intelligent buyer would go through all this trouble to buy the Titanic assets and also agree to the conditions set forth by the Judge — agree to keep the collection together and also allow it to be displayed to the public occasionally - while at the same time risking capital to earn enough revenue in order to offset at least the cost of maintenance of the assets.

One judge called it the best crop of games he had seen in some time, and I'd have to agree.

In a phone call on Monday, one author of the paper, Duke's Robert Jackson, agreed that there's no way to judge the time it took for the mixing of deep and near - surface fluids to occur, although he said it was unlikely to have been millions of years.

I'd be in favour of introducing total anonymity into peer review (i.e. the identity of the authors is also with - held for a period of time to reduce as much as possible natural personal prejudice)[DC: I agree that Wegman's and Rapp's work falls far short, even when judged at face value.

Deferred adjudication is like probation where you agree not to get a ticket (really a conviction) for speeding in the time allowed by the court, which can be 60, 90, 120 days or whatever the judge agrees.

As a law student learning trial practice, and later as a young lawyer, I recall being instructed numerous times about «Rule 1,» i.e., «When the judge agrees with you, stop talking!»

Lord Justice Briggs agreed with the other two judges in relation to the Regulations and Guidance, but found that «the defects in the procedures for applying for ECF at the time of the hearing [in the Administrative Court] were systematic and inherent, to the extent that rendered the scheme inherently unfair».

By law, the only time it is necessary to appear in court for a Collaborative Divorce is to present an agreed order for the judge's approval.

The trial judge found the Crown had proved the essential elements of first - degree murder, but went on to find her guilty of infanticide, agreeing with a defence expert who said her mental state at the time of the killings was affected by the effects of child birth.

The Court of Appeal agreed with the first instance judge that the claim was time - barred but held that his cause of action accrued when he acted on the alleged negligent advice in 1997; an earlier date than that found at first instance (it also agreed that the claimant could not successfully overcome the limitation defence by relying on the provisions of s 14A of the Limitation Act 1980).

However, there are always times when both sides simply can not agree and require a judge to make a legal decision for them.

Every state has different requirements in terms of how to complete a divorce, but all require a judge to review and approve the divorce settlement or, if the spouses can't agree to a settlement, decide how property will be divided and how parenting time will be shared.

Kaur says Resolution agrees that making decisions within 26 weeks will be in the interests of most children, but hopes judges will retain discretion to allow cases more time.

The judge considered all these factors, and despite the serious nature of the offense, agreed to a sentence of 12 months probation, rather than jail time.

Agreeing with the motion judge, it held that unless it has «exceptionally comprehensive language», a Release would apply only to claims known to the parties at the time it was signed.

If the judge were to agree with him, the company may have been liable for an amount of common law notice of dismissal several times greater than what they would have had to pay under the employment agreement as it was drafted.

In 1966, Kalven and Zeisel found that judges agreed with civil and criminal verdicts 78 % of the time, and that judge - jury disagreements were only rarely caused by the complexity of the evidence.

Mother did not voice any objection at the time of the hearing when the court asked multiple times if there were any additional issues that needed to be discussed and agreed when the judge suggested they «call it a day».

If the claim is to be paid over time but the parties are unable to agree upon how that will be done, they can go to court and have the judge help them work out a payment plan.

Couples, lawyers and judges agree that Mediation or Collaborative law are a much less time - consuming and costly way to settle a dispute than going to court.

But if Judge Clark agrees that Mr. Smith had a reasonable expectation of privacy and grants him standing, it would mean police forces across the country, who daily obtain subscriber information under PIPEDA requests, would have to revert to the old, labour - intensive system of seeking search warrants every time they want customer information from ISPs.

Essentially, the judge questions the parties to ensure that they understand the course of action they are taking, that the jurisdictional requirements of the case are met (for example, that the couple has lived in the state and the county for the required period of time) and that they both truly do agree to enter into the agreement of their free will.

A couple of the judges didn't perceive the meeting the same way as the above judge but agreed that though the conversation may have been uncomfortable at times, it was a lesser evil than not having a seat at the table at all.

Notwithstanding the small number of the First Nation inhabitants at the time of contact (estimated to be 400), and notwithstanding the fact that the First Nation was semi-nomadic, the Chief Justice agreed with the trial judge that those three requirements had been made out.

Because of GM's looming insolvency at the time, the court agreed with the trial judge that its decision to terminate the franchise agreements was a rational business decision.

Of course, rather than engage in a court battle and having a judge decide a time - sharing schedule, most family law professionals (including myself) will tell you that it is much better for the parents to agree on a time - sharing schedule through a private divorce resolution method such as collaborative divorce.

Although the Court of Appeal agreed it would be «preferable» for the Motion Judge to have accepted the acknowledgment forms at the time of the hearing, the Court declined to find a reversible error:

It may be that judges are simply not able to agree (or not within a reasonable time) on all points of the case.

«Court To Expedite Appeal In $ 3.4 B Class Action Settlement»: At «The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times,» Mike Scarcella has a post that begins, «The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has agreed to expedite a challenge to the $ 3.4 billion Native American class action settlement that a trial judge declared fair and reasonable.»

Timelines, simplified procedures, shared experts, and limited number of witness should be agreed to, or insisted on by judges, to make better use of court time and encourage early settlement

I agree that the flexibility of the common law is an advantage, but I wonder what the people think who paid the high legal fees to be advised that the rule in the 1975 case would apply as it had for decades... only to have the judges (however dressed) say «not this time, or in the future (until the next U-turn)».

But at the time of that decision one of the dissenting judge noted that that ruling was unprecedented, in fact she quoted, «the decision of a female employee as to which contraceptive drug or device to use remains a private matter of individual choice,» and I think most Americans would agree with that.

Some courts may require that you meet with the judge ahead of time to identify the issues that you and your spouse can't agree on, and to determine what you'll be disputing at trial.

If parents can not agree to changes on their own, a full hearing will be held, at which time the judge will hear evidence from both parents.

If the parents can't agree on a parenting plan, the judge has no option but to order equal parenting time, regardless of the logistics.

Parents may choose to settle the dispute any time before a judge issues an order and, if parents mutually agree, may change their custody agreement after the judge issues the order.

Child support is based predominantly on the incomes of the parents, the number and ages of the children, and the amount of time the children will be spending with each parent based on the parenting plan to which the parties have agreed (i.e., their consensual custody arrangement) or the parenting plan ordered by a judge).