Sentences with phrase «judge analytics»

Although basic access to Ravel Law is free, its Court Analytics and Judge Analytics features are available only to paid subscribers.

At this week's annual meeting of the American Association of Law Libraries in Philadelphia, at least three companies exhibiting there were touting their tools for judge analytics, and I know of one other exhibitor that has one in the works.

At its most advanced, Ravel also offers judge analytics, where you can see patterns about how judges rule and what ideas and people influence those judges.

The legal research service Ravel Law, which last year launched Judge Analytics to provide analysis of how individual federal court judges make decisions, today is launching Court Analytics, a similar feature that applies analytics to an entire court, including all its cases and judges.

Last January, it took the first step in that direction when it integrated judge analytics into Lexis Advance, and later in the year it added integration for law firm analytics.

«We took a fresh look at Judge Analytics and created a clean, new design, along with a major speed increase,» Lewis says.

Ravel already exists to help you with things like judge analytics.

Ravel Law's Judge Analytics promises to provide litigators with «never - before - available information and analysis about how individual federal court judges make decisions.»

Data on California state judges will be added to Ravel's Judge Analytics feature, allowing subscribers to explore analytics showing how these judges make decisions.

Last year, it launched Judge Analytics, Court Analytics, and Motion Analytics.

Two years ago, I wrote a post titled, In Litigation and Legal Research, Judge Analytics is the New Black, in which I discussed three products — Lex Machina, Ravel Law and ALM Judicial Perspectives — that were extracting data from court dockets and applying analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might rule on a specific type of motion or how long they might take to issue a decision.

Products in this space include ALM's Judicial Perspectives, Lex Machina, Premonition and Ravel Law with its Judge Analytics.

Last year, I wrote here that judge analytics is the new black.

Lex Machina is by no means the only legal company in this space — PacerPro recently launched a new analytics tool called Litigant Profiling and Ravel Law offers its Judge Analytics — but its acquisition underscores the growing significance of data analytics in law.

One of the products I covered in that post was Ravel Law's Judge Analytics, which promised to provide «never - before - available information and analysis about how individual federal court judges make decisions.»

Although basic access to Ravel Law is free, Judge Analytics is available only with Ravel's Elite - level subscription plan.

Today, Ravel Law introduced an update to its Judge Analytics product that adds both new content and new functionality.

The legal tech startup, Judge Analytics, created a platform that offers detailed insights on any judge in the US.

Ravel Law's Judge Analytics.

Judge analytics is the new black.

This year's winner: Ravel Law for its Judge Analytics.

Earlier this month, Ravel Law — which already had a Judge Analytics product — launched its Court Analytics to apply analytics tools to an entire court, including all its cases and judges.

A second feature is judge analytics.

Oh, and you will pay even more for the judge analytics.

Already, the LexisNexis Raleigh team and Ravel's development team have started working together and plans are underway to add new question types to Lexis Answers based on Ravel's court and judge analytics.

By that time, Ravel had also developed a suite of analytics that included court analytics, judge analytics and case analytics.

In a post yesterday, In Litigation and Legal Research, Judge Analytics is the New Black, I wrote about three websites that provide data and analytics about judges.

(For more on Ravel Law's Judge Analytics, see my posts here -LSB-...]

As Ravel adds new cases, it also incorporates them into other parts of its legal - research platform, including its Judge Analytics feature, which allows subscribers to explore analytics showing how judges make decisions.

Two years ago, I wrote a post titled, In Litigation and Legal Research, Judge Analytics is the New Black, in which I discussed three products — Lex Machina, Ravel Law and ALM Judicial Perspectives — that were extracting data from court dockets and applying analytics to reveal insights about judges, such as how they might -LSB-...]

Today at the Legalweek conference in New York, LexisNexis officially launched the first stage of that integration, judge analytics.

All of a sudden, it seems, judge analytics is the new black for litigators and legal research.