Sentences with phrase «judge and jury like»

You all play judge and jury like a bunch of clowns.

Not exact matches

But it's also worth considering that an employer who fires an employee simply based on the wrongdoing itself is effectively imposing a penalty — acting like judge, jury, and executioner — without any of the due - process protections that accompany a criminal trial.

A theologian (like a lawyer) wants to prove a certain point to the judge and jury.

The teaching of purity does not make any human being the judge and jury over others, nor does Deuteronomy, despite what this passage sounds like when you carve it out of the book.

Unfortunately, that has been flouted, generating reactions like that of Imran Khan, a former Pakistan cricket celebrity and current head of a new political [Justice] party in Pakistan: «No country has the right to be judge, jury and executioner....

Like christians who know nothing of atheism being judge and jury to the condemnation of atheists?

Judge Valerie Caproni said it was very early to get a note like this,» and quickly sent the jury back to work and reminded them that they should «respectfully exchange views.»

Like ALL employees (in both the public and private sectors), there's nothing unusual about your boss being both the judge AND jury when it comes to disciplining employeand private sectors), there's nothing unusual about your boss being both the judge AND jury when it comes to disciplining employeAND jury when it comes to disciplining employees.

In a ruling Friday night, U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack rejected the motion, finding that while some of the questions and answers were either inappropriate or «potentially inappropriate,» they and others like them would be barred from jury deliberations.

Now a study published in the journal Neuron shows that, just like in the courtroom, the brain's judge and jury sit in separate places.

120 Beats Per Minute — the title evoking heart rates and drum machines — won the Grand Prix, though there were some (including, perhaps, jury head Pedro Almodóvar, to judge from his comments at the post - ceremony press conference) who might've liked to see it get the Palme.

Assign roles to your learners like judge, accused, jury and victim etc..

The two have co-authored bestselling novels like Judge & Jury, Lifeguard, and The Jester.

Your work will already look like it's on another level of writing, above the average work in your genre, just because it's been judged by a jury and found to be the best.

I've been creating juried (judged) works of art and like many others who learned the hard way, I did it before we had such wonderful tests and tools.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).

Chen pointed out to me the dangers of having a developer be judge, jury and executioner in an eSports setting, pointing to issues like Riot Games» ban of two competitive teams as a cautionary tale.

Along with nominations for titles like «Fallout 4» and «Super Mario Maker» came a bit of detail about the panel of judges who helped select them: A roster of the 32 people on the jury appears to list only one woman.

Not so, like lawyers bringing up inadmissible evidence or points in trial and the judge tells the jury to ignore it, the damage is already done.

While we would like to assume that any reasonable judge and jury could see your injuries are the direct result of a major truck accident, insurance companies will use every trick in their book to deny your claim or offer the lowest settlement possible.

[3] Another way to increase similarity between your litigation team and the jury is to mirror body language by subtly matching the judge's or jurors» postures and gestures to make them feel more at ease and positive about you because you seem more like them.

You were in court listening to a judge trying to explain some principle of law to a jury, without using the words or phrases «trust me», «it's magic», «think of it like religion, you don't have to understand, just accept and believe» or «abracadbra»?

However, the appellant, like all who elect to be tried by judge and jury, had the right to a properly instructed jury

Sometimes the defendant will try to play it off like they are insane and start screaming nonsense before the judge and jury.

Both the judge and jury will be more likely to agree with you if you sound like you know what you're talking about.

Like State Farm v. Campbell, the Court said judges know better, and we must restrain juries.»

I would like to respectfully disagree with the fundamental premise underlying your statement, «If Blakely is about preferring adversarial to inquisitorial sentencing procedures and if the Framers wanted juries rather than judges to control sentencing, then are indeterminate sentencing systems unconstitutional?»

So construed question of law would include (without attempting anything like an exhaustive definition which would be impossible) questions touching the scope, effect or application of a rule of law which the courts apply in determining the rights of parties; and by long usage, the term question of law has come to be applied to questions which, when arising at a trial by a judge and jury, would fall exclusively to the judge for determination.»

I was going to wow the jury and to make a long story short, the judge is like, «What is that?

Just like a pure comparative negligence system, a judge or jury decides how much fault should be allocated to each person responsible for an accident and apportions the amount of damages accordingly.

Before the jury verdict came down, Judge Koh (in a preliminary injunction ruling last year) and many observers (including me) thought that Apple had a stronger case with its tablet design patent, while the smartphone design patent case looked like a closer call.

The district judges shall be elected by the qualified electors of their respective districts, and shall hold office for the term of 6 years (excepting those elected at said first election) from and including the first Monday of January, next succeeding their election and qualification; provided, that the First Judicial District shall be entitled to, and shall have three district judges, who shall possess co-extensive and concurrent jurisdiction, and who shall be elected at the same times, in the same manner, and shall hold office for the like terms as herein prescribed, in relation to the judges in other judicial districts, any one of said judges may preside on the empanneling [empaneling] of grand juries and the presentment and trial on indictments, under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by law.

I rather like the idea also that a jury has the right to declare a verdict which lawyers and judges may deem perverse.

Guilty verdicts of juries in criminal cases, and any verdict in a civil case like a patent law case, are subject to post-trial review by the trial judge who can throw out the verdict or call for a new trial for a variety of reasons, and to appeal.

The Judge too, like the jury, will simply not have specialist medical or scientific knowledge, and so will not be in a position to give expert evidence.