Sentences with phrase «judge at the case»

This, of course, would be dependent on the views of a judge at a case planning conference or a judicial management conference.
If the issues have been canvassed with the judge at a case conference and resolution has not been achieved at least on an interim basis, you may need to bring a motion; this is an important step in the process.
If you want to use an expert witness, you must tell the judge at the case management conference.

Not exact matches

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, saiAt the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, saiat the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.
Investigating judges suspect that managers of Bollore SA used advertising company Havas to facilitate the election of Alpha Conde in Guinea and Faure Gnassingbe in Togo nearly a decade ago by providing communications advice at a discount price, according to a person with knowledge of the case.
«This is not a whodunit type of case,» said federal judge Charles Breyer, who is overseeing the litigation, at a hearing in January.
For instance, we were once in a proceeding in which the judge made a ruling on evidence presented at trial by opposing counsel that was going to fundamentally change the outcome of the case.
In an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff in a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.»
At a hearing on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen asked if there was a «tension or inconsistency» for Uber to argue that every single one of its drivers is an independent contractor, yet to also argue that the legal issues in the case are so specific to each driver that it can't be decided as a class action.
Note that the judge in this case would have had the same range of sentencing options if the dollar amount at the heart of this case had been $ 3.15 rather than $ 3,150.
The Inc. + TOMS Pitch for Good is a program created by Inc. and TOMS to identify promising social businesses and invite a few of them to make their cases directly to a panel of judges, including Blake himself, at Inc.'s 2016 Growco Conference on May 17.
The judge hearing the case, Justice Sean Dunphy, sounds a bit puzzled as to why the case was brought before him at all, instead of hammered out in council chambers, according to reporters in the courtroom:
Seems to me judges ruling on important technical cases should at least be technologically literate.
The judge found that «none of the allegedly false statements put at issue in the complaint are adequate» to sustain the former workers» case.
Despite the fact that at least five of the judges involved in the two appeal court judgements were originally appointed to lower courts by Brian Mulroney's Conservative government, Harper insisted: «It was the government that decided to put the judges on the bench, the government that decided not to appeal, the government that decided to lose the case and the government that decided not to come back to Parliament.
A judge set bond at $ 500,000 for Cruz and ordered a host of pretrial conditions more often seen in felony cases than misdemeanors.
A judge would have to decide whether he is entitled to any bond at all on the attempted murder case because he allegedly violated the conditions of his release.
The Supreme Court is set to hear a seemingly minor case later this month on the status of administrative judges at the Securities and Exchange Commission, an issue that normally might only draw the interest of those accused of stock fraud.
At a hearing last week in Asheville, North Carolina, U.S. District Judge Max Cogburn said he would consider dismissing the lawsuit, saying the DoJ may not have the evidence to try this as a fraud case.
Given these considerations, and the current assessment of the economic outlook, the case for an easing was judged to have weakened since June, and thus the cash rate was again kept unchanged at both the July and August meetings.
Within the context of this broad strategic assessment, the Board judged at the time of the June meeting that the case for an easing was not sufficiently strong and, in the event, subsequent developments tended to weaken that case further, so that the cash rate was again held unchanged at the July and August meetings.
Nicola Sturgeon was speaking at First Ministers Questions after judges found in favour of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde which was appealing against a decision of the Court of Session in Edinburgh last year in the case of Mary Doogan and Connie Wood.
In the case at hand, Judge Miner and his colleagues determined that the relevant class was «all competent persons who are in the final stages of fatal illness and wish to hasten their deaths.»
«I have to now remain hopeful that the Supreme Court judges will look at the case objectively and allow the final appeal, eventually acquitting Asia.»
The case was adjourned for more than an hour while the judges rose to consider their decision, stating that they needed time to look at the situation.
AT the end of the Prop 8 appeals Case in California, the judge asked the plaintiff's attorney how exactly SS marriage threatens traditional marriage.
The exclamation point was stamped on our conviction to do something about our situation when we attended a talk at our parish by a monsignor who acts as a judge of the canon law tribunal in our diocese, considering annulment cases.
At least in cases where it is judged that a life is not worth living.
If something so important for each individual is dependent upon accepting / rejecting a supposed scriptural «truth» (as you define it) then make the case for how it makes any sense at all that humans would be judged negatively for rejecting something they have no idea exists!!
The judge should be dismissed from the bench and the case should be relooked at since the judge acted with prejudice against the victim.
John Kennedy repeatedly appointed segregationist judges to the federal bench in the South, and the civil rights case that Robert Kennedy most vigorously prosecuted involved charges brought against Albany, Georgia, activists for violating the rights of a white storeowner by boycotting his business because he had served on a jury that cleared the sheriff who had shot a black man three times in the neck at point - blank range.
US District Judge Mark Goldsmith had already issued a 14 day stay of removal on June 22nd for at least 114 mostly Christian Iraqis detained in the Detroit area, saying he needed time to work out whether he has jurisdiction over the case.
This does not mean that there is a point at which accommodation and neutrality converge (although there may be); it means only that as time and cases go by, the state - centeredness of what we are bold to call religious freedom is more and more apparent, and the pressure on religionists to conform to the expectations of others grows and grows, with the inevitable complicity of the judges who supposedly protect religion's «right» to be free.
Since all will rise at the same time, one will observe the judgment of the others and in some cases even influence it: «Your sons» who are exorcists «shall be your judges....
By the word of God we define: The Easterners can not complain against the Patriarch to western Patriarchs; that every case that can not be settled in his presence must await the judgement of Christ... (and) on no grounds whatever one can think or say that the Catholicos of the East can be judged by those who are below him, or by a Patriarch equal to him he himself must be the judge of all those beneath him, and he can be judged only by Christ who has chosen him, elevated him and placed him at the head of his church.
A similar impulse of group formation seems to have become operative along each zoological branch, but at very different ages of the earth; so far as we are able to judge, the phenomenon has occurred in each case at a predetermined age of the species under review.
On purely moral issues, judges are no more competent or trustworthy, as Justice Scalia observed in Cruzan, the Missouri «right to die» case, than «nine people picked at random from the Kansas City telephone directory.»
A High Court judge is set to oversee a further hearing on Alfie's case on Tuesday afternoon as Mr Justice Hayden is scheduled to hear more discussion at a hearing in Manchester.
He said: «I've looked at the cases he has tried and I have got no reason to doubt that he was a very high - ranking judge, he is not likely to be changing his spots now that he's got to this stage, and if people have got concerns it can actually be addressed.»
To this end his favorite device is to picture a cosmic assize in which Yahweh is at once plaintiff and judge; he advances his arguments and introduces his witnesses and then challenges the defendants to make out their case.
They are entirely separate issues — at no point did the judge dismiss the case because he agreed with the muslim.
And if in these cases, repulsive as they are to our ordinary worldly way of judging, we find ourselves compelled to acknowledge religion's value and treat it with respect, it will have proved in some way its value for life at large.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl is hearing the case, which will continue Thursday at the federal courthouse on Washington Street, Reading.
Yet judging from my own abilities at least, the attempt to make that alleged acknowledgement explicit leads either to an obvious case of merely relative nonbeing, such as the black background of my imagination, or to an unfulfilled and apparently unfulfillable intention, such as that involved in the attempt to conceive of a round square.
«I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people — not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral... In that case you would have to leave this world... what business is it of mine to judge those outside the Church?
It is not a case of judging that «a life is not worth living»; the question is whether there is a moral responsibility to continue at all cost the artificial feeding of patients who, in the opinion of physicians, are in an irreversible coma.
If there's going to be a law it needs to address all those cases, not be at the whim of individual judges who have religious motivations.
Democratic theory requires that a judge set the majority's desires at naught only in accordance with a superior law — in our case, the written Constitution.
Liberal judges will be «activist» or «restrained» depending on what, in a given case, best serves whatever liberal cause is at issue.
In a December 3, 2017 order dismissing the case that is likely to be viewed with some relief by many dairy companies, US district judge Katherine B Forrest agreed with Dannon, noting that a court handling a similar false advertising lawsuit about «non-GMO» claims on dairy products fed GM feed (Gallagher v. Chipotle Mexican Grill) rejected a similar claim at the pleading stage.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z