Sentences with phrase «judge changed custody»

The judge changed custody of the youngest child from the father to the mother.

In the face of the alienating parent's continuous and persistent campaign to undermine the other parent, the trial judge changed custody.

Not exact matches

This changing attitude toward companion animals is reflected in an increased number of custody battles and in the willingness of judges to consider the welfare or best interests of the companion animal when determining which party should get custody.

The judge, Thomas F. Hogan of Federal District Court in Washington, rejected a request by Ms. Miller and her lawyers that she be allowed to serve her detention at home or in Connecticut or elsewhere, and ordered that she be put in custody and taken to a jail in the District of Columbia area until October, or until she changed her mind about testifying.

Obviously something in the children's interviews made the trial judge believe that changing custody of the older child to Father was in that child's best interests.

First, the family court judge failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law to support the change of custody.

Most judges consider things like whether the current situation is working well for the child (if so, they're unlikely to change it) and which parent will be most likely to support the child's relationship with the other parent (a cooperative parent definitely has an advantage in a custody dispute).

(1) that the motion judge erred in finding a material change in circumstances warranting a variation of the joint custody order;

The father could therefore not claim that the motion to change judge had «delegate [d] custody, access and parenting decisions to a third party».

We agree with counsel for the appellant that the trial judge wrongly focused on the likely difficulties of a change in custody — which the only evidence on the subject indicates will be short - term and not «devastating» — and failed to give paramountcy to M.'s long - term interests.

The judge reviewed the law that says a Court must be careful in assessing parental alienation cases and directing any program of therapy or change of custody.

[25] The trial judge found it impossible to predict whether M would survive psychologically the «experiment» of changing custody in the only manner that would be available given Ms. A.'s «intransigence and determination».

The court didn't change her sentence, but issued groundbreaking orders to judges in Canada that they had to take an Aboriginal offender's past into account not only for sentencing, but to also look for alternatives to custodial sentences to address the critical over-representation of Aboriginal people in custody.

Section 60 - 1616 (e) of the state's legislative code states that if the custodial parent interferes with the non-custodial parent's visitation time repeatedly and unreasonably, this constitutes a change of circumstance that allows a judge to change residential custody.

Sometimes a judge may change custody, or parenting / visiting time to avoid further false accusations.

Having parents break up is difficult enough for children; judges are very reluctant to force additional trauma by radically changing an existing custody arrangement.

The judge will determine if there has been a significant change in circumstances and, if so, determine a new custody arrangement according to the best interests of the child.

Rather than ask a judge to determine a custody modification, parents can jointly complete, sign and file a «Stipulation and Order to Change» form with the circuit court that issued their current order.

Under Sections 20-2-204 and 20-2-201 (a) of Wyoming's statutes, a custody order can be modified by filing a motion but only when a «material and substantial» change has taken place since the last order was signed by a judge, and if addressing that change is in the best interests of the child.

Parents may choose to settle the dispute any time before a judge issues an order and, if parents mutually agree, may change their custody agreement after the judge issues the order.

The court must also look at each parent's record of compliance with the existing custody order and determine whether the relocating parent would comply with a changed visitation plan if the judge allows the move.

In Iowa, judges have the power to modify parts of a divorce decree, including alimony, child support and custody, when unanticipated changes have occurred.

A judge can change custody or simply order makeup visitation time.

Judges value stability for children, so they frown upon frequent custody changes.

If changes need to be made to the child custody agreement, the couple may be able to work out an agreement with a mediator and send it to a judge to approve, or they may need to go back into court to discuss the matter.

If you notify the court immediately that you've changed your mind about the custody terms, the judge may not sign the judgment and you can go back to the drawing board — either by attempting to negotiate a new agreement with your spouse or by going to trial so the court can decide custody.

[Appeal of trial court's change of custody granted: To change custody on four factors alone, as enunciated by the trial judge, and give less than equal weight to the love, affection and emotional ties the son had for and to his mother, her husband and her other children was found to be an error in law.]»

Preparing for Court with Custody X Change How to get ready for court, and to show the judge you are prepared.

If your ex moves to a new residence that is simply too small for your child to have a bedroom of her own, this, too, might qualify as a significant change of circumstances and convince a judge to modify custody.

If the court, at its discretion, does not believe the proposed change of custody is appropriate and in the child's best interests, the motion is dismissed by the judge.

Generally, you may request modification of a custody order if there has been a substantial change of circumstances that were unknown at the time the judge made the initial order.

If the spouse wants to change the custody rights or other obligations set by the judge, as child custody attorneys, we can provide experienced legal assistance.

However, just because it is a ground for modification doesn't mean that the judge will change custody.

Although a judge may be persuaded that shared custody is appropriate at the time of divorce, conditions might change to support modifying the order and awarding sole custody to you.

Generally, for the court to modify an existing custody order, there must be a change in a parent's lifestyle that has transpired since the judge entered the initial custody order.

If the judge finds that it's in the children's best interests not to move, he'll change custody to the parent remaining behind.

By law, judges must make custody decisions based on the child's best interest, which can impact the type of custody awarded and the ability of a parent to change a child's residence.

The proposed time - sharing changes could potentially upend the state's current policy of putting the needs of children first in favor of parents» wishes when judges determine custody arrangements, Scott wrote in Friday's veto letter.

The judge may make or suggest changes if the agreement is not fair or if your agreement on the care and custody of your child is not in your child's best interest.

It's aimed mainly at children who have been so alienated that a judge thinks there should be a change in custody to give the rejected parent time to reconnect.