Unfortunately theories, under their name of «propositions,» have been handed over to logicians, who have
countenanced the doctrine that their one function is to be
judged as to their truth or falsehood.
However, the sentencing
judge, Judge Rakoff, refused to countenance it as it was «a contrivance designed to provide the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] with a façade of enforcement and the management of the Bank with a quick resolution of an embarrassing enquiry... even under the most deferential view, this proposed Consent Judgment can not remotely be called fair.&r
judge,
Judge Rakoff, refused to countenance it as it was «a contrivance designed to provide the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] with a façade of enforcement and the management of the Bank with a quick resolution of an embarrassing enquiry... even under the most deferential view, this proposed Consent Judgment can not remotely be called fair.&r
Judge Rakoff, refused to
countenance it as it was «a contrivance designed to provide the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] with a façade of enforcement and the management of the Bank with a quick resolution of an embarrassing enquiry... even under the most deferential view, this proposed Consent Judgment can not remotely be called fair.»