Sentences with phrase «judge got it wrong»

However, the judge got it wrong on specific charter claims, and it's now time for the Texas Supreme Court to get it right,» said David Dunn, executive director of the Texas Charter Schools Association (TCSA).

For that lawyer who complained of that judge getting it wrong, my advice would be: know that judge and figure out how to get through to that judge.

The unanimous three - judge panel of the province's top court wrote that the motion judge got it wrong when he ruled the board had exclusive jurisdiction over the claim.

Often, the loser feels that the judge got it wrong and appeals the decision accordingly.

Not exact matches

When an employee misses the mark, rather than looking at the result and judging it as wrong — a failure — get them to look at what they know now that they didn't know before.

Also I am a Christian and I don't bash other people or other religions, actually I get looked down at because I don't, I have a gay friend, I have a Muslim friends and boy oh boy do the Christians try to talk to me about how wrong they are, this is what I say to them» I'm not God, God says pretty clear that we are NOT TO JUDGE any one, and I don't, I just love them for who they are.

Any kind of discrimination is wrong, let folks be judged by God, and get on with your own life!!

Funny how we all judge the priest of the Catholic Church and are quick to point a finger... Ever think that this is all our fault for letting our world get so ugly... Yeah don't get me wrong it makes me mad to think that someone I am supposed to be able to trust can turn around and do this to young boys.

scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.

The amendment of the Constitution according to a judge's perception of moral truth is itself so obviously morally wrong that it seems almost superfluous to add that, in any event, Arkes and Ball would not get the results they want.

Judges get things wrong all the time.

The preacher is right everyone should be who they are... but then again the Bible does state that it is an abomination to God... But get this... before God can judge you Jesus has to judge you... the BIble says NO MAN COME TO THE FATHER BUT BY ME... we have no room to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things...

And we could say still further: A style of judging that insists on focusing, in a demanding way, on whether the law is justified fits more aptly the true character of law, whether the judges get the answer in the case right or wrong.

Wenger said «Judge me on May», here is May... Carbon copy season to the previous seasons, the same mistakes, the same tactics, the same arrogance, nothing changed... I would like this review to come from the board... They has to question the manager what's gone wrong and what he need to get in the right track... Even - though somehow we finished second, I see us moved backward...

You are basically saying it does not matter if they get decisions wrong, or how many times they get them wrong, they should be «treated like judges» and we should just accept it.

I read somewhere that some said we're not clinical enough that is a culture at wenger has become too friendly with the players at Arsenal the players position are seldom under treat you play poorly for two weeks and you still make the team you missed a look at almunia retrospectively don't understand that hey if i get a chance to score i must take it the first time cause i may not get a next one and you want the players to be clinical it must start from the top good work or none As was said on a website to day Arsenal should parade through the streets of london in an open top Bus at the end of the season the accountants of the club and i will through wenger in there too cause to most of you he can do no wrong I love this club with all my heart and i can support no other club in football but to see for 5 seasons we can't show any vast improvement and keep making the same mistakes every year is hard to swallow it makes me sick but as wenger says judge me at the end i wonder what end he meant the end of the season or the end of his contract GO ARSENAL......................

It does for many men who get in front of the wrong judge, but not required.

Don't get me wrong, sometimes it feels wrong and other times people totally judge me (both silently and to my face), and my kids don't always understand why mommy needs a break.

So, it's understandable that that after this coup attempt, Erdogan would immediately get rid of the judges and prosecutors who are seen to be on the wrong side, who given their record would likely not have obstructed the coup plotters had they been successful.

I think Next Left got it wrong comparing it to Change.org, which is why you ended up judging it by the wrong criteria.

Do all you can to make sure everyone you know not only votes whenever they can, but let them know how and where they can get the information they need to judge who is right and who is wrong in Albany.

«These are the same lawyers who have got it wrong for the last 25 years and this is, as the judge himself said, a hugely significant ruling.

Don't get me wrong, I like reading about, for example, the correct way of wearing garments; it is when the issue seems to devolve into judging that I begin to be dismayed.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not telling you how you should judge a game.

However, maybe you \'re someone who likes to judge a book by it \'s cover and, inevitably, ends up getting the wrong impression of a game, therefore, possibly missing out on a really great experience.

Their luck turns sour when they get the wrong kind of judge (Miller, The Net), who insists that they give their marriage a try for six months, and have to live together.

Judging from pre-emptive censorship efforts in two districts, some of them are going to get it wrong.

Don't get me wrong, a well - judged power - assist on the steering rack makes the F - 250 pretty easy to maneuver, and reversing cameras are a godsend, but there's still a higher - than - average stress level in tight quarters.

Now don't get us wrong; this Dakota is perfectly capable of hauling a load and getting you up the trail, but its white - bread approach didn't win over any of our judges.

They get the law wrong FAR more often than a judge gets technology wrong.

It'll help you get over a fear of being judged for saying or doing the wrong thing and also suggest processes to push you on to do amazingly innovative things, via a process called «guided mastery»...

The real twister, is that the judges can never get it wrong, because there is no right.

Judge Alsup also mocked the numerous times IPCC predictive models got the current climate trends wrong and catastrophic weather never arrived.

It may still be too low, but it's hard for me to judge, or to state that the models all got it wrong.

Judging by the number of hits some climate change websites get, regardless if they're «warmer» or «skeptic» sites I'd say he not only got the book wrong, he got the reason for bad reviews and sales wrong, too.

Many thought that Judge Taylor reached the right legal outcome, but used weak or even wrong reasoning to get there.

Also, it seems that some UK legal academics who know what they're talking about believe the trial judge got the law wrong, even if the result is right.

There are numerous cases in which the judge does not follow the s. 211 report and in fact criticizes the author or the psychologist for getting the situation wrong.

Basically if you do not agree with the factual finding of a judge, i.e. what you did or did not do wrong, the BC Court of Appeal will not interfere with the trial judge and will uphold his or her judgement unless he / she clearly got the facts wrong — and to a degree that the entire judgment would fall because of that error.

In an interview with Computerworld, Nesson brushed aside the judge's criticisms and said it was she who got it wrong and that he will seek a new trial.

One is too likely to see cases which are marvelously reasoned — but are entirely wrong in result because there was already binding precedent the other way which, seemingly, neither judge nor lawyers knew about AND, in any event, none got what the issue actually was.

Lawyers love to complain about how the judges who preside over their cases somehow got it wrong.

I doubt that Oracle's lawyers would have put it this bluntly («the Court got it completely wrong») if they believed they were getting a fair trial in Judge Alsup's court.

-LSB-...] The only way Oracle could counter such testimony is by calling Judges O'Malley, Plager, and Taranto as witnesses to tell the jury that the Court got it completely wrong, and in fact that the declaring code and SSO are copyrightable.

The biggest problem facing the ongoing Oracle v. Google retrial is that Judge Alsup doesn't seem to have swallowed the fact that the IP - specialized Federal Circuit found it hard to believe how one could get copyright law as wrong as he did in this case («confused» is what one of the appellate judges said at the December 2013 hearing).

Oracle's lawyers essentially argue that jurors will place more faith in Judge Alsup's assessment (as they see him every day) than in that of an appeals court that is a few thousand miles away and won't appear in San Francisco to explain why Judge Alsup got the copyrightability part completely wrong.

She said clients were also hesitant to ask for assistance for fear of discrimination before the judge or that the interpreter would get something wrong.

Inevitably, when conscientious judges delve into the multi-dimensional issue of excessive punitive damages, they get some things right and other things wrong.

If a news organization can show it made every attempt to be fair and to confirm that the contents of a story are true, it has a defence to a defamation lawsuit, «even if it got some of its facts wrong,» a three - judge appeal panel said in its unanimous decision.

In other words, if the appellate judges believe the lower court got the law wrong, they will reverse its decision; but they will only reverse a finding of fact if the lower court made an especially egregious or obvious mistake.