Not exact matches
The patent fight billed as the «Ali - Frazier Fight of Biotech,» and a «clash of titans,» and the «last great priority
dispute of the «first - to - invent» era of US patent law» (um, okay, that final image is perhaps less evocative) had its first and only
hearing before
judges yesterday — and the line to get a glimpse of the brief proceedings wound its way around the lobby Christmas tree in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office building in Alexandria, Virginia (a view of which can be found here, in lawyer Jacob Sherkow's enthusiastic Twitter feed).
A Westchester County Supreme Court
judge heard oral arguments on the
dispute and is expected to rule Wednesday, said Elliott's attorney, Marc Landis.
Last Wednesday, New York Supreme Court
Judge Arthur M. Diamond ordered all contested ballots be preserved and scheduled a follow - up court hearing for this Wednesday after Lally's campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to consolidate the disputed ballot process from three judges reviewing each county's ballots, to one j
Judge Arthur M. Diamond ordered all contested ballots be preserved and scheduled a follow - up court
hearing for this Wednesday after Lally's campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to consolidate the
disputed ballot process from three
judges reviewing each county's ballots, to one
judgejudge.
The seventeen High Court
judges who have been assigned to handle anticipated electoral
disputes that may arise before the December 7, presidential and parliamentary elections are expected to
hear cases on a day - to - day basis.
A Unified Family Court replaced, with one
judge in one court, a collection of courts that
heard a variety of different family law
disputes.
We put down our fists and swords and let
judges and juries
hear our stories and resolve our
disputes.
«The matters to which the court must have regard include --(a) the financial value of the claim and the amount in
dispute, if different; (b) whether it would be more convenient or fair for
hearings (including the trial) to be held in some other court; (c) the availability of a
judge specialising in the type of claim in question; (d) whether the facts, legal issues, remedies or procedures involved are simple or complex; (e) the importance of the outcome of the claim to the public in general».
The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench announced starting in the autumn, the numbers of
judges hearing judicial
dispute resolutions in Calgary and Edmonton will be reduced from three to two a week.
Then the trial begins and an even more educated
judge with his own staff will sit with the lawyers and the parties and the witnesses for days and
hear everything and maybe
hear some
disputes about what the
judge should or should not
hear (because it's unfair to
hear some things).
Neil Rose further explains how this pilot project works: ``... the three stages of the online court would be: [One] An automated online triage stage designed to help LiPs articulate their claim in a form which the court can resolve, and to upload their key documents and evidence; [Two] A conciliation stage, handled by a case officer; and [Three], a determination stage, where those
disputed cases which can not be settled are determined by a
judge, by whichever of a face - to - face trial, video or telephone
hearing or determination on the documents is the most appropriate.»
It was found that the
Judge did not
hear evidence from the parties regarding the
disputed facts and therefore this lead to a sympathetic approach to the mother's position.
On the other hand, I have
heard senior
judges say that half of the cases (presumably once
disputed) settle for the wrong reasons, i.e. not because the parties have come to an acceptable compromise but because they, or one of them, have run out of money or patience or witnesses and can not or will not continue, however unsatisfactory that may be.
Considering that results may vary depending on the
judge, if the Court refuses to
hear the final
hearing matter, then the case would have to be transferred to civil court to be dealt with in the same manner that the court handles property ownership
disputes between two unrelated persons.
With years of trial experience, the Firm's lawyers are able to simplify and effectively convey the nuances of complex business
disputes to state and federal court
judges and juries, arbitration panels, administrative
hearing officers, and in various appellate forums throughout the country.
The
dispute sets up what could be an unprecedented
hearing at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse in the coming months involving a panel of district
judges hearing the multiple criminal cases at once.
On judicial review to the British Columbia Supreme Court, the
judge characterized the issue between Sechelt and the tenants as one concerning money, not Indian lands, and agreed that the DRO had jurisdiction to
hear the
dispute and apply the provisions of the Manufactured Home Park Tenancy Act because it is a provincial law of general application.
In a Markman
hearing,
judges must resolve all the
disputes about the interpretation of a patent and must construe the claims for trial.
Provide in the Trust Law that trust arbitrators have all of the powers of a
judge in
hearing such
disputes;
The arbitration provision applied, and that meant that the
dispute must be
heard by an arbitrator, rather than a
judge, the employer argued.
Judges now routinely convene so - called Markman
hearings, also known as claim construction
hearings, before trial to help them in their task of claim construction, which is at the core of many patent
disputes.
The Governor's proposal would eliminate this absolute right to a
hearing by amending Section 20 of the Workers» Compensation Law to allow for the scheduling of a
hearing before an administrative law
judge only after it is determined that the
dispute can not be resolved by undergoing non-binding «conciliation» procedures.
It is worth noting that
judges who are assigned to perform the task of mediation will be barred from
hearing the same
disputes.
Some
judges have found that by referring, for example boundary
disputes to mediation, they relieve themselves of having to
hear the most tiresome and futile cases in their lists.
The court procedure in Financial Remedy applications means that approximately 90 % of all cases settle at the Financial
Dispute Resolution
hearing, which is akin to in - court mediation, rather than go to a final
hearing when a
judge determines the outcome.
Described by a former Chief
Judge as a possible «case of the year» for 2018, the federal circuit's
hearing in the
dispute between the University of California, Berkeley and the Broad
The
judge hearing the appeal is limited to the evidence that was before the Tenancy
Dispute Officer.
If benefits are denied or
disputed, your attorney can request a
hearing in front of an arbitrator, like a
judge, who can order that you get paid.
In a
hearing or trial without a jury, the successor
judge shall at the request of a party recall any witness whose testimony is material and
disputed and who is available to testify again without undue burden.
Judge Gao mentioned that they at the SPC, too have noticed the worldwide trend of other jurisdictions establishing courts to
hear investor - state
disputes, citing Canada among them and that they are exploring whether the Chinese courts can do so as well.
On the rare occasions that conduct is a relevant factor, the following approach may be adopted; Allegations of conduct should be included in Form E although the parties should be discouraged from raising allegations of conduct unless absolutely necessary; The district
judge should clarify at the directions appointment whether conduct is being pursued and, if so, order particulars to be given of the precise allegations relied on and give directions as to the evidence to be adduced by each party; An alternative route may be to defer the filing and service of conduct statements until after the family
dispute resolution
hearing to allow potential settlement to be explored; It should be taken into account that conduct is one of the relevant considerations in determining whether proceedings should be transferred to the High Court, although conduct alone is unlikely to be sufficient to justify a transfer.
These trials are subject to case management, by the
judge who will
hear the trial, aimed at providing the parties with that level of process which is proportionate to the importance and complexity of the issues in
dispute, and ensuring that matters are ready to proceed when scheduled.
Extremely able
judges, whose efforts would be welcomed in engagement with the determination of issues and the resolution of substantive
disputes at
hearings, are now even more likely to get stuck in a mire of costs management.
«Instead of being decided by
judges and juries, cases will be
heard by arbitrators who are seasoned lawyers familiar with industry practice and issues specific to art
disputes.»
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
If you want to
dispute the charges, your ticket will also disclose a court date where you can expect to appear in front of a
judge or
hearing officer to address the merits of your case.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Worcester Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Franklin Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Springfield Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Attleboro Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Lynn Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Somerville Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Watertown Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Northampton Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Cambridge Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Chicopee Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Gardner Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a New Bedford Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Fitchburg Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Melrose Massachusetts municipal court
judge.
A
hearing will then be scheduled for you within the next few weeks after your request is received and you will have a chance to
dispute the charges against you in front of a Lowell Massachusetts municipal court
judge.