In municipalities and counties where there are no Masters
a Judge hears all matters.
The judge hearing the matter noted that all of the breaches alleged arose in the early stages of the plaintiff's proceedings during which the defendant's partner, and not the defendant, represented the plaintiff.
so,, if some issues require land related issues,, make sure
the judge hearing your matter, knows something about land issues..
The District
Judge hearing the matter applied the welfare principles to the facts of the case and dismissed the Father's application on the basis that a return to Kent and potential return to the North East thereafter would be too disruptive for the child and further that there were concerns about the welfare of the Mother if she were to return to Kent in light of her allegations concerning the Father's behaviour and her medical condition.
Not exact matches
«The Republican Senate refuses to hold
hearings on [Supreme Court nominee]
Judge Garland, refuses to fund the President's request for Zika aid and takes the most days off of any Senate since 1956, but thinks Facebook
hearings are a
matter of urgent national interest,» Jentleson said.
satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to
hear what the rabbis had to say on this
matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be
judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz
Even if we get a
hearing, the
judges will find some way of declaring that these are
matters for the government and the People — a nonsense, but apparently highly probable.
Hear his
judging words, no
matter where they strike and hurt.
And because this decisive
matter can never be seen,
judged, or evaluated from the outside, because unlike the military forces of a great king, no one can see or enumerate those who have become part of the «church army» of God, because this
hearing and heeding of God's call is a hidden
matter, known only to God Himself, we speak also of the invisible Church.
The
judge subsequently adjourned the
matter to June 1 and ordered that fresh
hearing notices be served on all parties.
The nominee was seeking for an order of prohibition directed at the trial
judge, Mr Justice Kwaku T. Ackah Boafo from further
hearing the
matter.
The
judge said the
matter would have to be addressed at another
hearing since the claim was not raised as part of his original suit.
Before adjourning the
matter till August 29 for further
hearing, the
judge said the date covered the seven days allowed in the Constitution for defendants to file their counter-affidavits.
And the possibility of resolving the
matter in a judicial proceeding may be limited since several
judges have an interest in the
matter, and may not therefore with propriety undertake to
hear and decide it.»
The
judge who will rule on the matter, state Supreme Court Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can hear this case.&r
judge who will rule on the
matter, state Supreme Court
Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can hear this case.&r
Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can
hear this case.»
The
matter would be
heard at Courtroom No. 32 by the Chief
Judge of FCT High Court, the police said.
Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne argued in his lawsuit that it was premature for an appeals court to
hear the case given that the lower court
judge scheduled a full
hearing on the
matter for Tuesday.
At the
hearing in the
matter, Friday, MTN's counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, led a team of MTN lawyers made up of 10 senior advocates, told the presiding
judge, Mohammed Idris, on Friday at the federal high court, Ikoyi, Lagos, that MTN has opted to settle out of court.
Silver recently had a bid rejected to get the Supreme Court to
hear his case, pushing the
matter back for a re-trial before U.S. District Court
Judge Valerie Caproni, who presided over his 2015 trial.
Additionally, he has served as an education policy analyst for the Michigan House of Representatives and as an Administrative Law
Judge for the Michigan Administrative
Hearing System, adjudicating unemployment
matters.
This means that a collector must sue you and the
matter must be
heard before a
judge before your wages can be garnished.
At the AAT
hearing in Adelaide, the impacts of wind farm noise were considered by a senior Federal Court
judge; the most thorough medial and scientific inquiry on the subject
matter conducted in Australia to date.
So my three co-defendants went ahead without me, and at the end of November the troika of DC
judges finally got around to
hearing oral arguments on the
matter.
In addition to ensuring that the
matter is ready to proceed to a contested
hearing, the case management
judge is specifically tasked ``... to explain the process and to otherwise advise the self - represented litigant what may be expected.»
In Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2016] 1 All ER 671 and Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, [2016] 1 All ER 685, which were
heard at the same time, the Supreme Court had to balance the importance of finality in litigation — in both cases the parties had reached agreement on all
matters and had obtained consent orders approved by High Court
judges (albeit that the order in Sharland had not been sealed); as against a material failure by a party to comply with their duty of disclosure.
Judge Carton was about to quickly dismiss this case when he
heard «Hersheys» and «brownie pan» but after seeing the pan above, I have decide to take the
matter under advisement.
Broward County
Judge Sharon Zeller says that as a «
matter of decorum,» she will not
hear a case if she can see a defendant's underwear due to overly baggy pants.
The courts held that an injunction could be granted where it was just and proportionate to do so and that a
judge hearing an injunction application could not consider the merits of the planning decision as this was a
matter for the appeal stage.
Nonetheless, Master Robertson goes on to indicate that, if this
matter had come before a Provincial Court
judge, the Provincial Court
judge would have authority to
hear the application to set aside the order and schedule a re-
hearing based on rule 9.15 of the Alberta Rules of Court, which allow the setting aside of an order made without notice or following a
hearing.
Worse, the jury that
hears indamissible hearsay that is not cured by subsequent testimony or evidence is not going to un-hear the inadmissible evidence no
matter how well - crafted are a
judge's curative instructions to ignore the inadmissible evidence.
We handle all
matters related to claims for workers» compensation benefits, preparing and filing all the necessary documentation to initiate and successfully process your claim, and acting as your advocate in all
hearings or proceedings, including the appeal of denied claims before administrative
judges or in court.
It didn't
matter that no
judge or jury was around to
hear their arguments.
We're not going to fix adequately the latter so long as most
judges are required to
hear the full range of civil
matters.
4.Re - define
hearings so as to allocate more time for
judges to review material and less time for oral
hearings in interlocutory
matters, and hybrid rather than conventional trials;
We then had a
hearing before a
judge who issued an ruling confirming that I would not be allowed to address the court on this
matter at any time.
[39] I acknowledge that Ms. Prakash's action is set for
hearing in February and an order that the
matters be
heard together will necessitate an adjournment of that trial; however, I am satisfied of a high degree of interconnectedness between the parties and that it is in the interests of justice that the
matters be
heard together, or as directed following the case planning process or by judicial management, if a
judge is appointed to
hear the
matter.
These applications are usually made to a
judge who sits every day to
hear urgent
matters.
As a
matter of practice, the Supreme Court indicates the
judge hearing the motion for directions «should generally be seized of the summary judgment motion itself,» ensuring his or her acquired knowledge about the
matter does not go to waste.
The
judge will
hear from both parents and take into account their wishes in the
matter.
«The
matters to which the court must have regard include --(a) the financial value of the claim and the amount in dispute, if different; (b) whether it would be more convenient or fair for
hearings (including the trial) to be held in some other court; (c) the availability of a
judge specialising in the type of claim in question; (d) whether the facts, legal issues, remedies or procedures involved are simple or complex; (e) the importance of the outcome of the claim to the public in general».
You want your lawyer to have a good reputation with other lawyers and especially the
judge who will be
hearing your case — this might impact the outcome of your
matter.
19 Today, instead of the presumption that a
judge who meets with counsel in a pretrial
hearing will not handle subsequent substantive
matters without the consent of the parties, we have a presumption that such a
judge may handle subsequent substantive
matters without consent unless there is a real apprehension of bias.
Some time ago at a pretrial conference, I
heard a lawyer correct a
judge over a trivial
matter.
A settlement conference is an opportunity to
hear from the
judge as to what s / he would likely order if the
matter was
heard by them at a trial.
A provincial court
judge sitting alone will
hear your case if it is a summary
matter.
Disciplinary
matters are
heard before an Administrative Law
Judge employed by the California Office of Administrative
Hearings.
The Claimant offered «no order as to costs» but the Defendant refused and the
matter went to a
hearing before District
Judge Morgan at Newcastle County Court.
Appeals from those decisions go to the Superior Court of Justice and are
heard by a single
Judge, usually less costly than more serious
matters.
In August 2015, the
matter was specifically allocated to another
judge and her first task was to conduct a fact finding
hearing, it being obvious that the allegations made by the mother would have a strong effect on the welfare decisions depending upon any findings.
My point is that no
matter how much free or discounted legal advice one gets if there isn't enough
judges or time before a
judge to be properly
heard, we are deprived of our Charter Rights s7 & s15.