Sentences with phrase «judge in the case»

In short, the trial judge in this case carefully and correctly considered all the relevant principles.

The driving school certificate of completion must be presented to the county court judge in your case in order for you to receive credit for taking a traffic ticket diversion course.

There was no doubt that at the end of a hearing, the judge might make an order of the kind that the defendant had sought from the district judge in this case.

It is unfortunate that the motion judge in this case did embark on the exercise of making findings of fact.»

«It's Judge v. Judge in Case of Bankrupt Law Grad Main U.N. Finds Lawyer Arranged His Own Death, Faked Assassination by President»

The trial judge in the case found that the grounds to make the breath demand were insufficient, but he applied Rilling, which held that it is unnecessary for the Crown to prove a lawful demand in order to rely on the evidentiary shortcuts.

The motions judge in the case concluded that the act of one lawyer for a client sharing the opposing party's compelled discovery evidence — in this case, documents — with another lawyer representing the same client in another related proceeding constitutes prohibited «use» of the evidence.

The presiding judge in each case agreed that ZECs are sufficiently structured as independent from energy and capacity products because the ability to receive a ZEC is untethered from wholesale market participation and thus do not encroach on FERC authority.

«Is the Overly - Snarky Judge in Your Case Secretly Making an Audition Tape, Part II Main Thursday's Three Burning Legal Questions»

«Convicted Cyberstalker Granted Resentencing by 9th Circuit Main Is the Overly - Snarky Judge in Your Case Secretly Making an Audition Tape, Part II»

[124] The chambers judge in this case considered whether the infringement of the Pridgens» freedom of expression was justifiable under section 1.

By Lester S. Rosen, Attorney at Law and CEO of Employment Screening Resources ® (ESR) A ruling by a federal judge in a case in Minnesota on March 26, 2013 underscores the need for background screening firms to carefully review their processes for re-investigation of consumer disputes.

Suspended First Vice Chairman of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Sammy Crabbe, has served notice he will appeal the dismissal of his suit by a High Court Judge in a case in which he prayed the court to nullify the suspension, which he insists was unconstitutional.

In dissent, Justice Scalia wrote as follows:»... the idea that the three District Judges in this case relied solely on the credibility of the testifying expert witnesses is fanciful.

Acknowledging the issues were novel, the motions judge in the case concluded that the defendant / accused had breached the deemed undertaking of confidentiality when he used for his criminal defence the plaintiff's documentary productions from the civil case without first seeking directions from the court as to whether and how he could do so.

Therefore, it appears removal of aggregate, even if just from the surface of the ground, requires a license under the Act unless it fits within one of the exceptions in the Act, such as to build a structure — which the appeal judge in this case found includes a fence.

Justice L. L. Mensah, the trial judge in the case involving Gregory Afoko, who has been accused of killing a former Upper East Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Adams Mahama, has ordered both parties to work expeditiously for the trial to end by June.

The Supreme Court has recognized an absolute privilege that protects the confidentiality of communications between judges in cases: see Mackeigan v. Hickman (1989) and Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v Criminal Lawyers» Association (2010).

Although the federal circuit judges in the cases decided in opposite directions, that discrepancy is likely to mean that the High Court will once more need to adjudicate the fate of the ACA.

That future, of course, will be largely decided by the to - be-named judge in the case, who will decide whether Kalanick gets to keep the board seat that he could eventually try to use as a launchpad to his old job.

Her appearance Thursday before Pakistan's Supreme Court was put off when one of the three judges in the case recused himself.

hahaha, I'm pretty sure they'd find all the faults in my cooking if I were showing this to judges, but thankfully, the only judge in this case = my own tastebuds!

The trial judge in the case erroneously concluded that five provisions of state education codes violated the constitutional rights of all students in California, particularly those who are poor and minority.

Teacher tenure laws were ruled unconstitutional Tuesday by a California Supreme Court judge in the case Vergara v. California, which could have far - reaching effects on education, reports Mel Robbins of CNN.

(Although Ontario judges are permitted to do this where warranted, the motion judge in this case showed over-reliance on the civil rules, and misunderstood when they could be invoked.).

As noted by the original divorce judge in this case, paternity was not necessarily determinative of child support obligations.

«The motions judge in this case reviews the historical evolution of the new tort and concludes that it's been implicitly, if not expressly, been recognized in Nova Scotia.»

The majority never discusses legal aid rates or the remuneration ordered by the trial judges in the cases under appeal — a curious omission in a decision that arose because of rates of pay.

She says from time to time it publicizes criticism of judges in cases where the judge's behaviour falls short of misconduct, such as in the recent case of Manitoba's Dewar.

The learned Judge in this case did a long journey to find out the scope of the Act under section 3 in light of the objects of the Act keeping in mind the international commitment and obligations under the New York Convention of which Bangladesh is a signatory and also the provision of the UNCITRAL Model Law.

The trial judge in this case held that the Brentwood bid was ineligible and that the Province had acted unfairly in considering and ultimately awarding the contract to what was essentially a new entity, the Brentwood / EAC joint venture.

The serious disagreement between the majority and minority judges in that case casts light on an important issue in administrative law, the characterization of administrative decisions

The trial judge in this case awarded $ 17,945 in fees to County, 25 % of its request, based on the premise that the retaliation claim was brought in bad faith.

We recognize that the trial judge in this case indicated he had reviewed the PSR before the sentencing hearing.

And there is very much this sense, as one of the Court of Appeal judges in these cases put it, that reopening these cases would make our judicial system grind increasingly slowly, so the response to the fact that the judicial system is underfunded — needs more judges, needs more court time, needs more investment — is to say no to cases and to refuse to open cases rather than to fund the system more and the upshot of that of course, is a reduced access to justice.

The appellate judge in this case imparted strong advice to defence counsel at the end of the judgement — advice that can be applied equally to the entire legal bar, regardless of the area of practice.

Because of the competing rights and interests at play when there are documents from a civil proceeding that may be used to impeach a party in another proceeding, the motions judge in the case came down heavily in favour of the need for an anticipatory motion for directions to be brought before the party seeking to use the documents actually uses them.

The trial judges in both cases referred extensively to my case of Cobb v. Martin Estate, 2017 ONCA 717 — a case that I will never forget.

Ouster clauses raise difficult questions about the relationship between the constitutional principles of the rule of law and the sovereignty of Parliament — as the disagreement between the two judges in this case demonstrates

(Of course, some judges will evade even clear rules, but let's assume that rules have at least some power to constrain judges in some cases.)

Yet, the fact that the motion judge in this case refused to stay the action in favour of arbitration based on allegations of pre-contractual misrepresentations shows that the issue of tort trumping arbitration continues to be a live issue for practitioners and motion courts.

Second, in terms of the accuracy story, the results from the individual judges indicate that in the presence of interveners judges in some cases vote in a direction different than would be predicted from general indicators of their ideology.