Sentences with phrase «judge in the case found»

In September and December 2014, two federal court rulings prompted by lawsuits filed by the Center and other allies restored federal protections to wolves in Wyoming and in the western Great Lakes states, with the judges in each case finding that in stripping protections for wolves the Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act.

The judge in this case found that the parking of the motorcycle on the walkway constituted an ordinary and well - known use of the vehicle and the incident was therefore a motor vehicle accident within the meaning of the SABS.

But the judge in this case found Zokol could not expect the Davis lawyers to keep information obtained through their conversations with him from Sagebrush as the company, and not Zokol, had been the firm's client.

The trial judge in the case found that the grounds to make the breath demand were insufficient, but he applied Rilling, which held that it is unnecessary for the Crown to prove a lawful demand in order to rely on the evidentiary shortcuts.

Not exact matches

The judge in the death - penalty case against a suspected USS Cole attacker has found the the chief defense counsel for military commissions, Marine Brig. Gen. John Baker, in contempt, according to a report from the Miami Herald.

In the ensuing months, however, the central reasoning of the case was cited time and again as judges in several states found gay marriage bans unlawfuIn the ensuing months, however, the central reasoning of the case was cited time and again as judges in several states found gay marriage bans unlawfuin several states found gay marriage bans unlawful.

The judge found that «none of the allegedly false statements put at issue in the complaint are adequate» to sustain the former workers» case.

Nevertheless, McGowan could face indictment in Virginia on a felony drug - possession charge after a judge found probable cause Thursday to send the case to a grand jury.

Nicola Sturgeon was speaking at First Ministers Questions after judges found in favour of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde which was appealing against a decision of the Court of Session in Edinburgh last year in the case of Mary Doogan and Connie Wood.

In the case of religious expression, having a government authority like a school district abuse their authority by forcing the graduating class to listen to only one religious viewpoint and prayer is reprehensible from a legal standpoint regardless of what corrupt judge you find to rule differently.

And if in these cases, repulsive as they are to our ordinary worldly way of judging, we find ourselves compelled to acknowledge religion's value and treat it with respect, it will have proved in some way its value for life at large.

The conservative justices fall back on this well - worn staple of conservative jurisprudence: that the «right» here can not be found in the text of the Constitution or in any «tradition» marked in the accumulation of cases over the years; and so the Constitution itself can not be the source of any such right that the judges have the authority to pronounce.

The judge, Mrs Justice Lang, accepted that the case was unusual and said Birk was: «required, against his wishes, to remain a serving police officer for an indeterminate period of time — which I accept could be as long as two to three years if the IPCC finds there is a case to answer — during which time he will not be able to work, either as a police officer or in any other capacity».

hahaha, I'm pretty sure they'd find all the faults in my cooking if I were showing this to judges, but thankfully, the only judge in this case = my own tastebuds!

In its appeal to the Full Court, Prysmian argued that the trial judge erred in finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismisseIn its appeal to the Full Court, Prysmian argued that the trial judge erred in finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein the conduct, had been dismissed.

On this basis the trial judge concluded that (para 298) «if Franklins was in the relevant market with Metcash (as the Commission clearly contended), it must be the case that the major supermarket chains, which his Honour found to be a closer competitive constraint than Franklins, must be included in that market.»

ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated that the ACCC believed «that there was sufficient evidence for the Court to find that Cussons had entered into an understanding» and that the appeal will allow the Full Court to «consider whether the trial judge should have inferred an understanding involving Cussons based on the uncontested evidence in this case.»

In one case in Rochester, New York, the judge found in favor of the father when an expert witness, a local psychologist, declared that «you have to be crazy to nurse that long.&raquIn one case in Rochester, New York, the judge found in favor of the father when an expert witness, a local psychologist, declared that «you have to be crazy to nurse that long.&raquin Rochester, New York, the judge found in favor of the father when an expert witness, a local psychologist, declared that «you have to be crazy to nurse that long.&raquin favor of the father when an expert witness, a local psychologist, declared that «you have to be crazy to nurse that long.»

In two cases, the judge found in favor of the motheIn two cases, the judge found in favor of the mothein favor of the mother.

The Illinois Appellate Court this week found that the judge in the McHenry civil case erred by raising the bar too high for state prosecutors seeking to ban Yvonne Cryns from practicing midwifery without a license.

In this case, Judge Robart found that all four factors fell in plaintiff's favor, requiring him to issue a temporary restraining ordeIn this case, Judge Robart found that all four factors fell in plaintiff's favor, requiring him to issue a temporary restraining ordein plaintiff's favor, requiring him to issue a temporary restraining order.

The undercover Journalist in a two - year investigative piece has established the complicity of some 34 Judges who have been found neck deep in corrupt activities in cases they presided over.

The Second Circuit found that a new Supreme Court decision narrowing public corruption laws in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell required different instructions than those used by Manhattan U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni.

The Brooklyn district attorney's office was set to ask a judge today to vacate the conviction of a man found guilty 20 years ago of committing a murder, as the prosecutors in the case withheld exculpatory evidence.

We find it very bizarre that the Hon. Attorney - General, Ms Gloria Akufo, who assured the entire citizenry of her commitment to fairness and strict adherence to ethical principles at her vetting not too long ago, will claim that she exercised the said constitutional discretion on grounds merely that there was a lack of evidence to prosecute the case in question when indeed, the Siting Judge, Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from same.

«They want to make sure in a case where a child maybe does not have legal representation, they work it out with the judge to delay hearing the case so that the advocates can find representation for those children,» Ms. Mark - Viverito said.

The appellate judges in Silver's case found that, under the Supreme Court's ruling, the instructions given to the jury at Silver's trial were improper and prejudicial.

Labour implemented the public inquiry into the case, in which retired High Court judge Sir William Macpherson found the Met police to be «institutionally racist».

But the judge overseeing the case, ruling on a host of pretrial motions, found this distinction somewhat immaterial, since Percoco, according to the government, «continued to function in a senior advisory and supervisory role with regard to the Governor's Office, and continued to be involved in the hiring of staff and the coordination of the Governor's official events and priorities.»

«Florida to monitor Broward election chief after judge finds «unlawful» ballot destruction in Wasserman Schultz race «via Marc Caputo of POLITICO — The elections supervisor in Florida's second-most populous county broke state and federal law by unlawfully destroying ballots cast in U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz «s 2016 Democratic primary, a judge ruled Friday in a case brought by the congresswoman's challenger who wanted to check for voting irregularities.

Judge Kaye found that Governor Paterson and his advisers had made errors of judgment in their handling of the case, but that their actions had not been criminal.

Some 5,215 other cases resulted in a youth offender adjudication, given when someone is found guilty but a judge seals the record at sentencing.

The judge noted that the claimant has the right to sue the first defendant but can only be suspended when found wanting in House rule 37 to 39 which is not related to the case in view.

The judge in Mr. Silver's case, Valerie E. Caproni, found in 2015 that Mr. Bharara's office had orchestrated a «media blitz» after the speaker's arrest.

Although a judge initially ruled that Singh's words constituted an assertion of fact, which would have made it hard for him to win a trial case, in April 2010 an appeals court found that his statement qualified as «fair comment» and was therefore protected.

Most judges and juries are not persuaded by neurobiological evidence used to argue that a defendant was not fully responsible for his or her actions, as in Gunther's case, the analysis found.

But in the most recent case in 2010, NRC acted as both judge and executioner, retracting the grant of a researcher at the Karolinska Institute after finding widespread misconduct in her lab; on the basis of their findings, her new employer, Gothenburg University, fired her.

Bisexual dating online Bisexuals find it difficult in most cases to search for a partner and there is still a stigma on them, as many people tend to judge them or call them undecided or that they simply want to experiment.

Bisexuals find it difficult in most cases to search for a partner and there is still a stigma on them, as many people tend to judge them or call them undecided or that they simply want to experiment.

Synopsis: Satirical drama in which an idealistic lawyer who tries to win cases for clients trapped in a hypocritical and corrupt legal system finds himself defending a venal and self - righteous judge accused of rape.

When he's found guilty, Hanks advises the judge to keep him in jail rather that give him the death penalty, because he sees him a chance for a prisoner exchange in the future in case the soviet's catch a U.S. spy, which does happen three years later.

Since then, a high - profile court battle ensued, resulting in a Superior Court judge finding that the program violates the state's constitutional mandate to use public funds only for public schools — but thanks to a Court of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the case winds its way through the state appellate courts.

For example, the judge in the CCJEF school funding case found a lack of reading and math intervention staff throughout the CCJEF districts, as well as shortages of space, time and supplies for reading and math intervention.

Public school students who had at least 10 unexcused absences in a six - month period found their truancy cases heard by justices of the peace or municipal judges.

In that seminal case, a judge found North Carolina had failed to provide a «sound, basic» education for all students, regardless of the relative wealth in their local school districtIn that seminal case, a judge found North Carolina had failed to provide a «sound, basic» education for all students, regardless of the relative wealth in their local school districtin their local school districts.

c) Any court cases and lawsuits will be judged in Quebec, Canada d) If your court case is found to be without merit then you will pay Books Butterfly for all legal fees incurred by Books Butterfly e) If your court case is found to be without merit then you will pay Books Butterfly for defamation and slander, wrongful legal claims, and loss of business due to your court case

«Apple Loses: Judge Finds Price - Fixing in E-Book Case» by Andrew Albanese at Publishers Weekly — July 10, 2013

The attorney for PHEAA said, «As you know a lot of Courts attempted to pursue undue hardship and find undue hardship in order to get at a partial discharge, and that's a tendency that has to be resisted, and it has to be resisted in this case because the debtor has to meet each and every one of the prongs in order to first find undue hardship and so, you know, we can understand why Judge Radcliffe may have gone to accept the Debtor's argument.»

My reading of the trial documents makes me think that the judge in the appeals case would be hard pressed to find a justification for reducing the settlement; what would the new settlement amount be based on?

Unprejudiced and positive tests are therefore greatly needed, and these can only be found in show and trials under judges who have the common interest so keenly in view that they will allow neither friendship nor personal bias to control the awards; men who will bear ever in mind that upon their decision will greatly depend the future reputation of the animal in the stud, and who will therefore examine carefully each specimen before them, giving due credit to beauty and blood, but in all cases where possible requiring also performance were they pronounce a favorable verdict».