Sentences with phrase «judge in this case did»

A judge in the case did not...

The judge in the case did not set bail; Wills was released of his own recognizance and is due back in court August 10 for sentencing.

The judge in the case did not, in his specific questions to the parties, ask if there was a consensus on the science, or whether climate change would present catastrophic risks.

«We believe the judge in this case did not take into consideration the overwhelming amount of evidence that show that these statutes work very well all over the state in well - run school districts,» said Frank Wells, a spokesman for the California Teachers Association.

It is unfortunate that the motion judge in this case did embark on the exercise of making findings of fact.»

Not exact matches

Army Col. Jeffery R. Nance, the military judge overseeing Bergdahl's case, had ruled in February that Trump's statements as a candidate (and, therefore, a private citizen) didn't rise to the level of undue command influence.

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.

In most cases, we hone the skills that society smiles on, taking jobs because we don't want people to judge us or because others want us in specific roleIn most cases, we hone the skills that society smiles on, taking jobs because we don't want people to judge us or because others want us in specific rolein specific roles.

The filmmakers had partly won the case in September, when a judge ruled that Warner / Chappell did not hold a legitimate copyright to the song.

As the judge in the case ruled, Apple played «a central role» in convincing publishers that its model would raise e-book prices, which it did.

«Furthermore, although the average sentence lengths (conditional on case, defendant and judge attributes) do not differ by defendant race in the absence of a football effect, it appears that an upset LSU football game loss increases the disposition length (sentence severity) of black defendants more severely in comparison to white defendants.

As a result, the judge did not render a decision on the merits of our case,» John Ryan, president and CEO of CSBS, said in a statement on Tuesday.

Even if Schneiderman does take the case to court, it will probably go through years of appeals through the New York system, with the case going in front of 13 judges who will each have their take on what constitutes gambling.

Parties going to trial file motions in limine to exclude certain types of evidence from trial and this is what they did here and the judge decided that those particular pieces of information are not relevant to this case.

And one of the problems is that the judge is currently on trial in another case, so he doesn't really have a lot of time.

They had the courts do it for them; they put the judges in they wanted, then they failed to appeal, failed to fight the case in court.»

As my PaidContent colleague Jeff John Roberts reported last month, Harris» attempt to have this court order struck down failed for a somewhat unusual reason: namely, the judge hearing the case decided that Harris did not have any legal interest in the tweets he sent, because such rights only apply to things a user actually owns — and users do not own their tweets for the purposes of the U.S. Constitution.

In the cases that Judge Sweet dismissed last month, the shareholders did not own Facebook stock in the build up to the social network's IPIn the cases that Judge Sweet dismissed last month, the shareholders did not own Facebook stock in the build up to the social network's IPin the build up to the social network's IPO.

The exclamation point was stamped on our conviction to do something about our situation when we attended a talk at our parish by a monsignor who acts as a judge of the canon law tribunal in our diocese, considering annulment cases.

In the case of these Catholic priests who did just that, they should be made to stand before a judge and jury for thier actions.

In our particular case the intended interpretation of the formal system would be our cosmic epoch, and provided that there were truths about it that the formal system either did not express or contradicted, the formal system could be judged inadequate.

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

«However, I intend to do so before an independent Tribunal, not before yourselves acting as a judge and jury in your own case.

Protestants and Catholics will have to judge for themselves how well the declaration succeeds in stating «a consensus in basic truths,» and whether it makes the case that the 16th - century condemnations do not apply — even though they remain on the books as «salutary warnings,» to which teaching and preaching must attend.

In social life, God commands that all cases shall be judged with equity; justice and charity are required; no injustices shall be done to people because of hatred toward them; all life is made sacred by God and may not be ended except through justice.

In case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime, then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a tesIn case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime, then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a tesin the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a tesin order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a test.

God «judges» the righteous and the wicked, meaning He hears their cases and decides what do in each case.

Maybe in such cases, this is where the two sides can gather separately to worship and serve as they see fit, but neither side should condemn or judge or bad - mouth the other side, and both sides should be willing to do things together that they can do — such as go serve in the community.

And did not Paul write (and I'm paraphrasing in both cases, as I do not not have the exact verses memorized), «do not be quick to judge, lest you be judged in the same manner,» and, «do not act in a manner which creates barriers to others, causing them to lose faith.»

He could do what he pleased and even if, as in Jephthah's case, his vow involved the sacrifice of his daughter's life, (Judges 11:30 - 40.)

The conservative judges did not move seriously to that level until John Roberts's dissent in the Obergefell case.

A judge who departs from the Constitution, as the majority did in the five cases mentioned, is applying no law other than his will.

Judging the constitutionality of laws by the Court's «appraisal of the wisdom of legislation,» as he accused the Court of doing in this case, «is an attribute of the power to make laws, not of the power to interpret them.»

But if you're just doing it coz you like the recipe then hey, who am I to judge, and in which case I'd have no idea.

Supa, in all of your posts you keep carping on Mixon's «physical superiority» and the idea that he could have «restrained» her... that has NOTHING to do with it, and that's not how these cases are judged, no matter how many times you say it.

You're very funny bro.Yet why is that upon all these stats why do I get the feeling that if top teams in the world were given the chance to sign only one of an in form Wilshere and in form Walcott both at their best everyone will be going for Wilshere.I keep telling people that even some of the players we rate as world class are useless in so many stats.For example some players you rate over some players might have inferior stats as compared to the ones you don't rate.I'd be happy if people would use stats to.compare players always as you do here instead of using their eyes to judge in some cases and use stats to justify themselves in some cases.

I often feel that way about players but then again I don't see them all week in training so it is sometimes difficult to judge every case from the outside.

I just wanted to chime in here, too... not to judge but to pass on information in case one day you did want to attempt to breastfeed another child.

But isn't it odd to judge another person's marriage based on what you would do in your marriage in the case of marital infidelity, especially when most of us are incredibly fluid about how we define infidelity.

Judging from the number of parents supporting and taking interest in this case and speaking out about rape and rape culture and the victimization of women and children, I would assume the majority of the world understands the purpose of Operation Roll Red Roll, which I believe is justice for the Jane Doe victim.

The judge said he took the action to ensure Patterson doesn't have contact with witnesses or victims in the case and can't alter records.

Yes, they are supposed to support you when breastfeeding, but it is horrible when you are not breastfeeding, and you have to go through the talk about it several times with someone who says in one breath they can't believe that their sister in law didn't stick with breastfeeding because in most cases there is no real reason not to, and in the next says that it is your choice, and she is not going to judge you about it.

Countries judge their own cases in international law, and do so on a case by case basis, not based upon grand universal principles that clearly dictate an answer.

«Definitely, whilst a serving judge, Your Lordship would have invoked this principle in the resolution of some cases, It is therefore expected that Your Lordship should not be a party to or consciously engage in or encourage an action that will amount to an affront to the authority and integrity of the court or stymie the efforts and capacity of the court to do justice in the pending case».

(Recall that the AG's office actually doesn't have subpoena power in corruption cases until the governor specifically refers a case to his office, which is why Andrew Cuomo couldn't compel testimony in the Troopergate case, but former Chief Judge Judith Kaye — working as Cuomo's request on the ethics charges lodged against Gov. David Paterson — can do so).

As he did in the wake of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's sentencing, Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued a brief statement in response to the five year sentence handed down by a federal judge in the corruption case of ex-Majority Leader Dean Skelos.

Judge Caproni, in her decision, did not say she thought Silver's case was closely related to McDonnell's, but did concede that the way jurors were told to define «official acts» in corruption cases could be questioned by a higher court, in light of the McDonnell case.

The two on June 29, warned judges of Ghana's highest court to be wary of their conduct in the case involving the Electoral Commission and Mr Abu Ramadan if they did not want to suffer the fate of the three members of the bench who were shot to death and burnt on June 30, 1982 in the era of the Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC).

His intervention drew huge support from peers, many of whom are lawyers and judges and came in marked contrast to the reaction of Truss, who is also lord chancellor, who did not step in after the tabloid press attacked the High Court judges who heard the case.

The Hon. Judge then proceeded on National assignment as an Election Petition Tribunal member and did not deliver the judgment even after his return in November, 2015, when he transferred the case file to the Chief Judge for it to start de-novo.