Sentences with phrase «judge in this case held»

The trial judge in this case held that the Brentwood bid was ineligible and that the Province had acted unfairly in considering and ultimately awarding the contract to what was essentially a new entity, the Brentwood / EAC joint venture.

Not exact matches

The filmmakers had partly won the case in September, when a judge ruled that Warner / Chappell did not hold a legitimate copyright to the song.

In this case, Kings County Commissioner Carols Velataqui's ruling will hold for 11 days until another hearing by King County Superior Court Judge Jim Rogers, according to Geekwire.

Bitcoin futures, in particular, present an interesting case study because typical defenses might not hold up in front of a judge.

Within the context of this broad strategic assessment, the Board judged at the time of the June meeting that the case for an easing was not sufficiently strong and, in the event, subsequent developments tended to weaken that case further, so that the cash rate was again held unchanged at the July and August meetings.

Nonetheless, given the tentative signs of easing in domestic demand pressures, the Board judged that there was a case to hold the cash rate steady for the time being, to allow further time to assess the strength of inflationary pressures.

That's the kind of reasoning that used to get you into trouble in legal method courses during the first year of law school for failing to distinguish between the actual holding of a case and the obiter dicta of the judges.

The security guy took me to the Jefferson County police station, and although no charges were filed against me, I was quickly transported to the county courthouse and made to sit in a holding cell while the judge finished up that day's traffic cases.

If you mean he hasn't the ability to judge in tackles well that can be addressed just like in Holdings case.

«Perhaps in that particular case, maybe more training for judges, maybe the OCA could deal with that directly to make sure the people who are held on bail need to be truly held on bail.»

A federal judge today will hold a special hearing to discuss the roles in a Turkish - American businessman's legal case by former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former U.S. AG Michael Mukasey, a onetime federal judge who served in the George W. Bush administration.

The judge ruled, «Having held that the applicant's case is not made out, I further hold that the applicant is not entitled to any of the relief sought in this application.

The judge was prepared to sentence Terry on Tuesday, as scheduled, but Terry's attorney asked Quinn to hold off one more time and allow the sentencing in the federal case to proceed first.

Rumore said a State Supreme Court judge has now ordered a stay in the case, putting a hold on start time changes at the school and New York State Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia will decide if Cash has the authority to make the adjustment.

Stevens supported his argument by citing Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., [39] where the Court held that $ 3 million in independent expenditures in a judicial race raised sufficient questions about a judge's impartiality to require the judge to recuse himself in a future case involving the spender.

At 12:30 p.m., a pre-trial hearing in Assemblywoman Pamela Harris» corruption case will be held, U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein, Courtroom 10B South, Brooklyn.

At 11:30 a.m., a court hearing will be held before Judge Andrew Carter in the corruption case against former Corrections Union head Norman Seabrook, 40 Foley Sq., Courtroom 1306, Manhattan.

A Connecticut judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School attack, delivering a blow to an ambitious effort to hold accountable the makers of the assault rifle used in the 2012 massacre before the case ever went to trial.

Paterson's attorney said the PIC should hold off until after former Judge Judith Kaye weighs in on this matter, much like it did in the case of the David Johnson domestic violence scandal.

He said, «The trial judge distinguished the Lagos State case from the present one, and held that whereas the court of Appeal so held against Lagos State environmental sanitation days on the ground of same not being a creation of law thus could not be enforced against the plaintiff therein, whereas the Oyo State environmental sanitation days are held pursuant to the provisions of the Oyo State Environmental Law of 2012, 2015, and regulations made thereunder, making the Oyo State exercise legal and constitutional unlike the scenario created in the Lagos case.

On February 17, U.S. District Court Judge William K. Watkins held a status conference in Stein v Chapman, the Alabama ballot access case.

The case went back to Judge Haik, who once again ruled in favor of the mining groups, holding the federal government in contempt of court and reaffirming that the DEMS scientists must turn over all data and drafts of any papers they plan to publish.

The 7th Circuit upheld a trial judge's ruling dismissing the case, holding that the federal Communications Decency Act doesn't permit people to «sue the messenger just because the message reveals a third party's plan to engage in unlawful discrimination».

The Judge highlighted the case of The Old Co-operative Day Nursery Ltd v OFSTED [2016] EWHC 1126 (Admin) in which Coulson J, held that an OFSTED inspector's conclusion had been irrational because she failed to have regard to the history of the nursery or previous reports in reaching her decision.

In a dissenting opinion, President Judge Dan Pellegrini said the majority «conjures up some sort of unexpressed dicta or holding» from the Montessori case.

The University of Colorado's Board of Regents will hold a special meeting Friday to decide whether the university should get involved in the Lobato v. Colorado case, in which a judge last year struck down Colorado's K - 12 school funding system, calling it «irrational and inadequate.»

If you choose to file a chapter 13 case in which you repay your creditors what you can afford over 3 to 5 years, you may also want help with preparing your chapter 13 plan and with the confirmation hearing on your plan which, if held, will be before a bankruptcy judge.

In his order dismissing the case, Judge John G. Koeltl ruled that the registration statements accompanying ProShares leveraged and inverse ETFs stated «in plain English» their daily performance objectives and clearly disclosed the possibility that «the ETFs» value could diverge significantly from the underlying index when the ETFs were held for longer than one day.&raquIn his order dismissing the case, Judge John G. Koeltl ruled that the registration statements accompanying ProShares leveraged and inverse ETFs stated «in plain English» their daily performance objectives and clearly disclosed the possibility that «the ETFs» value could diverge significantly from the underlying index when the ETFs were held for longer than one day.&raquin plain English» their daily performance objectives and clearly disclosed the possibility that «the ETFs» value could diverge significantly from the underlying index when the ETFs were held for longer than one day.»

O. Any final and definitive decision of an administrative law judge, or in the case such decision is appealed, a final and definitive judgment of an appellate court, issued in connection with any hearing held pursuant to this Chapter and the Administrative Procedure Act shall be considered a valid and final judgment that may be made executory by the commissioner in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure.

Last Friday, Judge Deborah Batts ruled against famed artist Richard Prince in the case of Patrick Cariou v. Richard Prince, Gagosian Gallery, et al 08 CV 11327 (S.D.N.Y. March 18, 2011)(Batts, J.), finding that the artworks in Prince's Canal Zone exhibition — held at Gagosian in 2008 — constituted copyright infringement.

The Twitter Moot, held at 10 am PST / 1 pm EST, saw event Judges Kathleen Mahoney, Omar HaRedeye, and William Deverell grill teams from 5 Canadian law schools over Twitter in a case about First Nations, coal mining and an endangered caribou herd.

Moreover, videos can ultimately hurt litigants — a judge might question a party's judgment in posting a video and hold it against him in ruling on the case.

In that case, U.S. District Judge George Daniels ruled that Congress, not the courts, should decide whether Trump is violating the Constitution by failing to divest his business holdings.

MGN also submitted that the judge misdirected himself when he held that there might be cases where a party was justified in continuing to trial even though he had received a favourable offer.

A few months after holding an hourlong oral argument, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in late July to remand the case to the trial judge, U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel, who, in turn, agreed to vacate eight of his published opinions and to «direct» Lexis and Westlaw to remove them from their databjudge, U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel, who, in turn, agreed to vacate eight of his published opinions and to «direct» Lexis and Westlaw to remove them from their databJudge Lawrence F. Stengel, who, in turn, agreed to vacate eight of his published opinions and to «direct» Lexis and Westlaw to remove them from their databases.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.

The Court of Appeal held that in the Ellacott case the sentencing judge considered all of the required factors, including:

Both the trial judge and the Court of Appeal held that the case was adversarial, and was not being brought for the benefit of or in the interests of the plan as a whole, but for the particular class of plan members representative by the plaintiffs.

In cases where an accused is held in custody without bail, they will be given an opportunity to go in front of a judge and have a bail hearinIn cases where an accused is held in custody without bail, they will be given an opportunity to go in front of a judge and have a bail hearinin custody without bail, they will be given an opportunity to go in front of a judge and have a bail hearinin front of a judge and have a bail hearing.

If there are accusations about domestic violence in a child custody case, the judge has to hold an «evidentiary hearing» (a trial before a judge without a jury) to decide whether a parent has engaged in one or more acts of domestic violence against the other parent, the child, or another family or household member.

Absolutely agree with your comments however I seriously doubt that the judge in Mr. Olis» case will consider anything but his own previously held assumptions.

But in other cases, the judge may deem the arrested a danger to the community or a flight risk and hold him in custody until trial.

At Paragraphs 7 - 10, the trial judge (Madam Justice Humphries) explained why in this case the Plaintiff had «sufficient reason'to bring the suit is Supreme Court holding that:

The judge rejected Morris» argument that the defamatory statements were clearly set out in the website postings, holding that «it is not the role of the Court to parse the impugned articles and blogs... to attempt to determine, by divination or divine inspiration, which statements it should assess in determining whether a prima facie case has been established.»

In Abney's case, however, Judge Few would have held that «the decision was based on a critical misunderstanding of the law,» thereby entitling Abney to post-conviction relief.

I have represented judges and other public officials in libel cases and they are held to a high bar of having to prove actual malice by clear and convincing evidence and they should be.

Binding arbitration is held either before one arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators in larger cases, such as where a product defect may have been a factor in the car accident, and the process more like a trial with the arbitrators generally retired judges.

The leading case is R v Morris, 1998 NSCA 229 where Justice Thomas Cromwell held, at paras. 34 - 5 and 43, that Garofoli does not foreclose a reviewing judge from considering whether the conduct of the police in seeking a warrant was so subversive of the process that the warrant must be set aside to «protect the process and the preventive function it serves».

On the subsidiary question of whether or not he should exercise his discretion not to set aside, impliedly conferred on the court by s 339 (2) and considered at paras 26 — 28, the judge held that such discretion as he had should only be used in circumstances which are «extremely rare», and Haines's case, in his view, was not within that category.

In his judgment in that case, Nicholas Mostyn QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, (as he then was) held that, where a relationship had moved seamlessly from cohabitation to marriage, it was artificial to treat the periods differentlIn his judgment in that case, Nicholas Mostyn QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, (as he then was) held that, where a relationship had moved seamlessly from cohabitation to marriage, it was artificial to treat the periods differentlin that case, Nicholas Mostyn QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, (as he then was) held that, where a relationship had moved seamlessly from cohabitation to marriage, it was artificial to treat the periods differently.